This qualitative study examined how female breast cancer patients without partners conceptualized their relationship status. Qualitative data were collected from 20 participants who did not have partners during diagnosis and treatment. Phenomenology informed the methodology and thematic analysis. Breast cancer patients without partners discussed how they made meaning of their relationship status within the context of their cancer experience and barriers they faced dating post-diagnosis or treatment. Oncology care providers, public health professionals, and family scientists can use the study results to better understand the specific concerns and experiences of breast cancer patients without partners. Additional implications of these findings for patients, practice, and research are discussed.
AdamsC.van ManenM. (2008). Phenomenology. In GivenL. (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 614–619). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
2.
AllenK. (1989). Single women/family ties. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
3.
Ashing-GiwaK. T.GanzP. A. (1997). Understanding the breast cancer experience of African American women. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 15(2), 19–35.
4.
BerkL. (2007). Development through the lifespan (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
5.
BoehmerU.FreundK. M.LindeR. (2005). Support providers of sexual minority women with breast cancer: Who they are and how they impact the breast cancer experience. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 29, 307–314.
6.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
BukiL. P.GarcesD. M.HinestrosaM. C.KoganL.CarrilloI. Y.FrenchB. (2008). Latina breast cancer survivors’ lived experiences: Diagnosis, treatment, and beyond. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14, 163–167.
8.
CreswellJ. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
DePauloB. M.MorrisW. L. (2005). Singles in society and in science. Psychological Inquiry, 16, 57–83.
10.
DorvalM.MaunsellE.Taylor-BrownJ.KilpatrickM. (1999). Marital stability after breast cancer. Journal of National Cancer Institute, 91, 54–59.
11.
ErciB. (2007). Psychometric evaluation of self-assessed support needs of Women with Breast Cancer Scale. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16, 1927–1935.
12.
FangC. Y.ManneS. L.PapeS. J. (2001). Functional impairment, marital quality, and patient psychological distress as predictors of psychological distress among cancer patients’ spouses. Health Psychology, 20, 452–457.
13.
FergusK. D.GrayR. (2009). Relationship vulnerabilities during breast cancer: Patient and partner perspectives. Psycho-Oncology, 18, 1311–1322.
14.
FobairP.SpiegelD. (2009). Concerns about sexuality after breast cancer. Cancer Journal, 15, 19–26.
15.
GalvánN.BukiL.GarcésD. (2009). Suddenly, a carriage appears: Social support needs of Latina breast cancer survivors. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 27, 361–382.
16.
GanzP. A.RowlandJ. H.DesmondK.MeyerowitzB. E.WyattG. E. (1998). Life after breast cancer: Understanding women’s health-related quality of life and sexual functioning. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 15, 501–514.
17.
GinterA. C.BraunB. (2014a). Female breast cancer patients’ needs and resources: Implications for patients without partners and health care professionals. Journal of Womens Health, Issues & Care, 3, Article 3. doi:10.4172/2325-9795.1000147
18.
GinterA. C.BraunB. (2014b). Single mothers with breast cancer: Relationships with their children. In McCormickJ.BlairS. (Eds.), Family relationships and familial responses to health issues (Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research, Volume 8A, pp. 163–182). United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
19.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine Publishing.
20.
HamiltonR.HurleyK. E. (2010). Conditions and consequences of a BRCA mutation in young, single women of childbearing age. Oncology Nursing Forum, 37, 627–634. doi:10.1188/10.ONF.627-634
21.
KneeceJ. (1995). Helping your mate face breast cancer: Tips for becoming an effective support partner. Seattle, WA: Educare Press.
22.
KravdalH.SyseA. (2011). Changes over time in the effect of marital status on cancer survival. BMC Public Health, 11, Article 804.
23.
KuoT. M.MobleyL. R.AnselinL. (2011). Geographic disparities in late-stage breast cancer diagnosis in California. Health & Place, 17, 327–334.
24.
LahadK. (2012). Singlehood, waiting, and the sociology of time. Sociological Forum, 27, 163–186.
25.
LewisK. G.MoonS. (1997). Always single and single again women: A qualitative study. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 23, 115–134.
26.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
27.
ManneS. L.OstroffJ.WinkelG.GranaG.FoxK. (2005). Partner unsupportive responses, avoidant coping, and distress among women with early stage breast cancer: Patient and partner perspectives. Health Psychology, 24, 635–641.
28.
MorrowS. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 250–260.
NayeriK.PitaroG.FeldmanJ. G. (1992). Marital-status and stage at diagnosis in cancer. New York State Journal of Medicine, 92, 8–11.
31.
OsbourneC.OstirG. V.DuX. L.PeekM. K.GoodwinJ. S. (2005). The influence of marital status on the stage at diagnosis, treatment, and survival of older women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 93, 41–47.
32.
PereiraM. G.BritoL.SmithT. (2012). Dyadic adjustment, family coping, body image, quality of life and psychological morbidity in patients with psoriasis and their partners. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 19, 280–287.
33.
PerzJ.UssherJ. M.ButowP.WainG. (2011). Gender differences in cancer carer psychological distress: An analysis of moderators and mediators. European Journal of Cancer Care, 20, 610–619.
34.
PolkinghorneD. E. (1994). Reaction to special section on qualitative research in counseling process and outcome. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 510–512. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.41.4.510
35.
RadinaM. E.GinterA. C.BrandtJ.SwaneyJ.LongoD. R. (2011). Breast cancer patients’ use of health information in decision making and coping. Cancer Nursing, 34(5), E1–E12.
36.
RottmanN.HelmesA. W.VogelB. A. (2010). Patients’ needs and experiences at breast cancer diagnosis: How perceived threat influences the physician-patient interaction. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 28, 157–172. doi:10.1080/07347330903570529
37.
SchmidtJ. E.AndrykowskiM. A. (2004). The role of social and dispositional variables with emotional processing in adjustment to breast cancer: An Internet-based study. Health Psychology, 23, 259–266.
38.
SchramT. H. (2006). Conceptualizing and proposing qualitative research. Columbus, OH: Pearson.
39.
SharpE. A.GanongL. (2011). “I’m a loser, I’m not married, let’s just all look at me”: Ever-single women’s perceptions of their social environment. Journal of Family Issues, 32, 956–980.
40.
SmallM. L. (2009). “How many cases do I need?” On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography, 10, 5–38. doi:10.1177/1466138108099586
41.
SpencerM. B. (2007). Phenomenology and ecological systems theory: Development of diverse groups. In DamonW.LernerR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 829–888). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
42.
SteinP. (1981). Single life: Unmarried adults in social context. New York: St. Martin’s.
43.
TairaN.ShimozumaK.ShiroiwaT.OhsumiS.KuroiK.SajiS.. . . KatsumataN. (2011). Associations among baseline variables, treatment-related factors and health-related quality of life 2 years after breast cancer surgery. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 128, 735–747.
44.
Taylor-BrownJ.KilpatrickM.MaunsellE.DorvalM. (2000). Partner abandonment of women with breast cancer: Myth or reality?Cancer Practice, 8, 160–164.
45.
ThorntonR. L. J.PoweN. R.RoterD.CooperL. A. (2011). Patient-physician social concordance, medical visit communication and patients’ perceptions of health care quality. Patient Education & Counseling, 85, e201–e208.
46.
TuckerM. B.Mitchell-KernanC. (1998). Psychological well-being and perceived marital opportunity among single African American, Latina, and White women. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 29, 57–72.
47.
VahdaniniaM.OmidvariS.MontazeriA. (2010). What do predict anxiety and depression in breast cancer patients? A follow-up study. Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, 45, 355–361.
48.
WhiteJ. L.BoehmerU. (2012). Long-term breast cancer survivors’ perceptions of support from female partners: An exploratory study. Oncology Nursing Forum, 39, 210–217.
49.
WhiteJ. M.KleinD. M. (2008). Family theories. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
50.
WittenbergL.YutsisM.TaylorS.Giese-DavisJ.Bliss-IsbergC.StarP.SpiegelD. (2010). Marital status predicts change in distress and well-being in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer and their peer counselors. Breast Journal, 16, 481–489.
51.
YangH.SchulerT. (2009). Marital quality and survivorship. Cancer, 115, 217–228.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
