Doctors,Patients,and Interpreters’ Views on the Co-Construction of Empathic Communication in Interpreter-Mediated Consultations: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Video Stimulated Recall Interviews

Abstract

Doctors and patients rely on verbal and nonverbal resources to co-construct clinical empathy. In language-discordant consultations, interpreters’ communicative actions might compromise this process. We aim to explore doctors, patients, and professional interpreters’ perspectives on their own and others’ actions during their empathic interaction in interpreter-mediated consultations (IMCs). We analyzed 20 video stimulated recall interviews with doctors, patients, and interpreters using qualitative content analysis. Doctors and patients found ways to connect with each other on the level of empathic communication (EC) that is not limited by interpreters’ alterations or disengaged demeanor. Some aspects of doctors and interpreters’ professional practices might jeopardize the co-construction of EC in IMCs. The co-construction of EC in IMCs is not only subject to participants’ communicative (inter)actions, but also to organizational and subjective factors. These results provide evidence of the transactional process between the behavioral, cognitive, and affective components of clinical empathy in the context of IMCs.

Keywords

empathic communication medical interpreting health communication qualitative content analysis interpreter communication barriers emotions illness experience

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barrett-Lennard

G. T.

(1981). The empathy cycle: Refinement of a nuclear concept. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28(2), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0167.28.2.91

Bernardo

M. O.

CecÃlio-Fernandes

Costa

Quince

T. A.

Costa

M. J.

Carvalho-Filho

M. A.

(2018). Physicians' self-assessed empathy levels do not correlate with patients' assessments. PLoS One, 13(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198488

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bylund

C. L.

Makoul

(2002). Empathic communication and gender in the physician–patient encounter. Patient Education and Counseling, 48(3), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00173-8

Bylund

C. L.

Makoul

(2005). Examining empathy in medical encounters: An observational study using the empathic communication coding system. Health Commun, 18(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc1802_2

Del Piccolo

Mazzi

M. A.

Mascanzoni

Lonardi

De Felice

Danzi

O. P.

Buizzab

Ghilardib

Bottacinia

Goss

(2019). Factors related to the expression of emotions by early-stage breast cancer patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 102(10), 1767–1773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.04.002

Derksen

Bensing

Lagro-Janssen

(2013). Effectiveness of empathy in general practice: A systematic review. The British Journal of General Practice, 63(606), E76–E84. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X660814

Duncan

(1972). Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23(2), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033031

Elo

Kyngäs

(2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

10.

Finset

(2012). ‘‘I am worried. Doctor!’’ Emotions in the doctor-patient relationship. Patient Education and Counseling, 88(3), 359–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.022

11.

Fox

F. E.

Rodham

K. J.

Harris

M. F.

Taylor

G. J.

Sutton

Scott

Robinson

(2009). Experiencing “the other side”: A study of empathy and empowerment in general practitioners who have been patients. Qualitative Health Research, 19(11), 1580–1588. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309350732

12.

Gabay

(2019). Patient self-worth and communication barriers to Trust of Israeli Patients in acute-care physicians at public general hospitals. Qualitative Health Research, 29(13), 1954–1966. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319844999

13.

Gair

(2012). Feeling their stories: Contemplating empathy, insider/outsider positionings, and enriching qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 22(1), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732311420580

14.

Graneheim

U. H.

Lundman

(2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001

15.

Haase

R. F.

Tepper

D. T.

(1972). Nonverbal components of empathic communication. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19(5), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033188

16.

Hadziabdic

(2011). The use of interpreter in healthcare: Perspectives of individuals, healthcare staff and families. Doctoral dissertation. Linnaeus University. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:444194/FULLTEXT01.pdf

17.

Hall

J. A.

Schwartz

(2019). Empathy present and future. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(3), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1477442

18.

Halpern

(2003). What is clinical empathy? Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18(8), 670–674. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21017.x

19.

Halpern

(2014). From idealized clinical empathy to empathic communication in medical care. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 17(2), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-013-9510-4

20.

Henshaw

E. J.

Flynn

H. A.

Himle

J. A.

O'Mahen

H. A.

Forman

Fedock

(2011). Patient preferences for clinician interactional style in treatment of perinatal depression. Qualitative Health Research, 21(7), 936–951. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732311403499

21.

Hojat

(2016). Empathy in health professions education and patient care. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27625-0

22.

Howick

Moscrop

Mebius

Fanshawe

T. R.

Lewith

Bishop

F. L.

Mistiaen

Roberts

N. W.

Dieninyte

Aveyard

Onakpoya

I. J.

(2018). Effects of empathic and positive communication in healthcare consultations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 111(7), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076818769477

23.

Hsieh

(2006). Conflicts in how interpreters manage their roles in provider–patient interactions. Social Science & Medicine, 62(3), 721–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.029

24.

Hsieh

Bruscella

Zanin

Kramer

E. M.

(2016). It’s not like you need to live 10 or 20 years”: Challenges to patient-centered care in gynecologic oncologist–patient interactions. Qual Health Res, 26(9), 1191–1202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315589095

25.

Hsieh

Hong

S. J.

(2010). Not all are desired: Providers’ views on interpreters’ emotional support for patients. Patient Educ Couns, 81(2), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.004

26.

Hsieh

Kramer

E. M

. (2012). The clashes of expert and layman talk: Constructing meanings of interpreter-mediated medical encounters. In C. Callahan (Ed.), Communication, comparative cultures and civilizations (Vol. 2, pp. 19–44). Hampton Press.

27.

Hsieh

Kramer

E. M.

(2021). Rethinking culture in health communication: Social interactions as intercultural encounters. John Wiley & Sons.

28.

Hsieh

Nicodemus

(2015). Conceptualizing emotion in healthcare interpreting: A normative approach to interpreters’ emotion work. Patient Educ Couns, 98(12), 1474–1481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.06.012

29.

Hsieh

H. F.

Shannon

S. E.

(2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

30.

Jeffrey

(2016). Empathy, sympathy and compassion in healthcare: Is there a problem? Is there a difference? Does it matter? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 109(12), 446–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076816680120

31.

Kim

S. S.

Kaplowitz

Johnston

M. V.

(2004). The effects of physician empathy on patient satisfaction and compliance. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 27(3), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278704267037

32.

Kirk

T. W.

(2007). Beyond empathy: Clinical intimacy in nursing practice. Nursing Philosophy, 8(4), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-769X.2007.00318.x

33.

Knapp

M. L.

Hall

J. A.

Horgan

T. G.

(2013). Nonverbal communication in human interaction. WadsworthCengage Learning.

34.

Krystallidou

Bylund

C. L.

Pype

(2020). The professional interpreter’s effect on empathic communication in medical consultations: a qualitative analysis of interaction. Patient Educ Couns, 103(3), 521–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.09.027

35.

Krystallidou

Remael

de Boe

Hendrickx

Tsakitzidis

van de Geuchte

Pype

(2018). Investigating empathy in interpreter-mediated simulated consultations: An explorative study. Patient Educ Couns, 101(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.07.022

36.

Krystallidou

Salaets

Wermuth

Pype

(2018). EmpathicCare4All. study protocol for the development of an educational intervention for medical and interpreting students on empathic communication in interpreter-mediated medical consultations. A study based on the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework phases 0–2. International Journal of Educational Research, 92, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.09.009

37.

Krystallidou

Van De Walle

Deveugele

Dougali

Mertens

Truwant

Van Praet

Pype

(2018). Training “doctor-minded” interpreters and “interpreter-minded” doctors: The benefits of collaborative practice in interpreter training. Interpreting, 20(1), 126–144. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00005.kry

38.

Lan

(2019). Crossing the chasm: Embodied empathy in medical interpreter assessment. https://repository.hkbu.edu.hk/etd_oa/674

39.

Lorié

Á.

Reinero

D. A.

Phillips

Zhang

Riess

(2017). Culture and nonverbal expressions of empathy in clinical settings: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 100(3), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.09.018

40.

Mehrabian

(2017). Nonverbal communication. Routledge.

41.

Mentrup

Harris

Gomersall

Köpke

Astin

(2020). Patients’ experiences of cardiovascular health education and risk communication: A qualitative synthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 30(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319887949

42.

Mercer

S. W.

Reynolds

W. J.

(2002). Empathy and quality of care. The British Journal of General Practice, 52(Suppl), S9–S12. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12389763/

43.

Napier

(2011). It's not what they say but the way they say it”. A content analysis of interpreter and consumer perceptions towards signed language interpreting in Australia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 207, 59–87. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2011.003

44.

Neumann

Scheffer

Tauschel

Lutz

Wirtz

Edelhäuser

(2012). Physician empathy: Definition, outcome-relevance and its measurement in patient care and medical education. GMS Zeitschrift für medizinische Ausbildung, 29(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000781

45.

Paskins

Mchugh

Hassell

(2014). Getting under the skin of the primary care consultation using video stimulated recall: A systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14(101), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-101

46.

Paskins

Sanders

Croft

P. R.

Hassell

A. B.

(2017). Exploring the added value of video-stimulated recall in researching the primary care doctor–patient consultation: A process evaluation. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917719623

47.

Schouten

B. C.

Meeuwesen

(2006). Cultural differences in medical communication: A review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling, 64(1–3), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.11.014

48.

Schouten

B. C.

Schinkel

(2015). Emotions in primary care: Are there cultural differences in the expression of cues and concerns? Patient Education and Counseling, 98(11), 1346–1351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.05.018

49.

Smith

J. A.

Shinebourne

(2012). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In Cooper

Camic

P. M.

Long

D. L.

Panter

A. T.

Rindskopf

Sher

K. J.

(Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 73–82). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-005.

50.

Stensland

Sanders

(2018). Living a life full of pain: Older pain clinic patients’ experience of living with chronic low back pain. Qualitative Health Research, 28(9), 1434–1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318765712

51.

Theys

Krystallidou

Salaets

Wermuth

Pype

(2020). Emotion work in interpreter-mediated consultations: a systematic literature review. Patient Educ Couns, 103(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.006

52.

Theys

Nuyts

Pype

Wermuth

Salaets

Krystallidou

(2021). The Empathic Communication Analytical Framework (ECAF): A multimodal perspective on emotional communication in interpreter-mediated consultations. Linguistica Antverpiensia. New series : themes in translation studies, 20, 159–185.

53.

Vaismoradi

Turunen

Bondas

(2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048

54.

VandeKieft

(2001). Breaking bad news. American Family Physician, 64(12), 1975–2001. https://www.aafp.org/afp/2001/1215/p1975.html

55.

White

(1989). Backchannels across cultures: A study of Americans and Japanese. Language in Society, 18(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500013270

56.

Zhou

Lundy

J. M.

Humphris

Mercer

S. W.

(2015). Do multimorbidity and deprivation influence patients’ emotional expressions and doctors’ responses in primary care consultations?–An exploratory study using multilevel analysis. Patient Education and Counseling, 98(9), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.05.026