‘You Are Kind of Like One of Us’: Exploring Researcher Positioning in Studying Community-Based Health Promotion Interventions Among Social Housing Residents of Danish,Turkish and Pakistani Origin
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2022
‘You Are Kind of Like One of Us’: Exploring Researcher Positioning in Studying Community-Based Health Promotion Interventions Among Social Housing Residents of Danish,Turkish and Pakistani Origin
The practice of qualitative research demands reflexivity throughout the entire research process, with special attention directed towards researcher positioning. In this article, I explore how aspects and characteristics of my social situation positioned me contrary to my expectations regarding researcher positioning. I draw on individual interviews, focus group discussions and field notes about community-based health promotion interventions among residents of Danish, Turkish and Pakistani origin in a deprived social housing area in Denmark. Rather than insider-outsider positioning, the concept represented by the term ‘halfie’ unfolds the complexity of my researcher positioning: less minority ethnic than the residents of Turkish and Pakistani origin and less Danish than the residents of Danish origin, but similar to both, being a descendant of Sri Lankan Tamil origin brought up in a Danish social housing area. Finally, I present methodological and ethical implications of being a halfie in the context of qualitative health research.
Abu-LughodL. (1988). Fieldwork of a dutiful daughter. In. AltorkiS.El-SolhC. F. (Eds.). Arab women in the field: Studying your own society (1st ed., pp. 139–158). Syracuse University Press.
2.
Abu-LughodL. (1991). Writing against culture. In. FoxR. G. (Ed.). Recapturing anthropology: Working in the present (1st ed., pp. 137–162). https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v9i19.399.
AhmadF. (2003). Still ‘in progress?’ – methodological dilemmas, tensions and contradictions in theorizing south asian muslim women. In. PuwarN.RaghuramP. (Eds.). South Asian women in the Diaspora (1st ed., pp. 43–66). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474215558.ch-003.
5.
AhmedA.VandrevalaT.HendyJ.KellyC.AlaA. (2019). An examination of how to engage migrants in the research process: Building trust through an ‘insider’ perspective. Ethnicity & Health, 40, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2019.1685651.
6.
BergerR. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475.
7.
BhopalK. (2009). Identity, empathy and “otherness”: Asian women, education and dowries in the UK. Race Ethnicity and Education, 12(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613320802650923.
8.
BhopalK. (2010). Gender, identity and experience: Researching marginalised groups. Women’s Studies International Forum, 33(3), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2009.12.005.
9.
BonevskiB.RandellM.PaulC.ChapmanK.TwymanL.BryantJ.BrozekI.HughesC. (2014). Reaching the hard-to-reach: A systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-42.
10.
CreanM. (2018). Minority scholars and insider-outsider researcher status: Challenges along a personal, professional and political continuum. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.1.2874.
11.
FinlayL. (2002). “Outing” the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973202129120052.
12.
FordC. L.AirhihenbuwaC. O. (2010). The public health critical race methodology: Praxis for antiracism research. Social Science & Medicine, 71(8), 1390–1398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.07.030.
13.
FryerC. S.PassmoreS. R.MaiettaR. C.PetruzzelliJ.CasperE.BrownN. A.ButlerJ.IIIGarzaM. A.ThomasS. B.QuinnS. C. (2016). The symbolic value and limitations of racial concordance in minority research engagement. Qualitative Health Research, 26(6), 830–841. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315575708.
14.
GunaratnamY. (2003). Messy work: Qualitative interviewing across difference. Researching race and ethnicity (1st ed., pp. 79–105). https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857024626.d6.
15.
HøghøjM. (2019). Between Utopia and Dystopia: A socio-cultural history of modernist mass housing in Denmark, c. 1945-1985. Aarhus University.
16.
KanuhaV. K. (2000). “Being” native versus “going native”: Conducting social work research as an insider. Social Work, 45(5), 439–447. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/45.5.439.
17.
KhawajaI.MørckL. L. (2009). Researcher Positioning: Muslim “Otherness” and Beyond. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 6(1-2), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880902900713.
18.
KristiansenM.YounisT.HassaniA.SheikhA. (2016). Experiencing loss: A muslim widow’s bereavement narrative. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(1), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-015-0058-x.
19.
LarsenT. S. (2014). Copenhagen’s west end a “Paradise Lost”: The political production of territorial stigmatization in Denmark. Environment and Planning A, 46(6), 1386–1402. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45640.
20.
LavisV. (2010). Multiple researcher identities: Highlighting tensions and implications for ethical practice in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 7(4), 316–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880902929506.
21.
MartinS. S. (2012). Exploring discrimination in american health care system: Perceptions/experiences of older iranian immigrants. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 27(3), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-012-9168-z.
22.
NarayanK. (1993). How native is a "native" anthropologist. American Anthropologist, 95(3), 671–686.
23.
OchiengB. M. N. (2010). “You know what I mean”: The ethical and methodological dilemmas and challenges for black researchers interviewing black families. Qualitative Health Research, 20(12), 1725–1735. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732310381085.
24.
Serrant-GreenL. (2002). Black on black: Methodological issues for black researchers working in minority ethnic communities. Nurse Researcher, 9(4), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2002.07.9.4.30.c6196.
25.
SixsmithJ.BonehamM.GoldringJ. E. (2003). Accessing the community: Gaining insider perspectives from the outside. Qualitative Health Research, 13(4), 578–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732302250759.
26.
SongM.ParkerD. (1995). Commonality, difference and the dynamics of disclosure in in-depth interviewing. Sociology, 29(2), 241–256.
27.
SrivarathanA.JensenA. N.KristiansenM. (2019). Community-based interventions to enhance healthy aging in disadvantaged areas: Perceptions of older adults and health care professionals. BMC Health Services Research, 19(7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3855-6.
28.
SrivarathanA.LundR.ChristensenU.KristiansenM. (2020). Social relations, community engagement and potentials: a qualitative study exploring resident engagement in a community-based health promotion intervention in a deprived social housing area. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2341. http://10.3390/ijerph17072341.
29.
Von GaudeckerJ. R. (2018). Challenges in conducting ethnography among hidden populations in rural South India. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 50(6), 351–355. https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000399.
30.
Weiner-LevyN.Abu Rabia QuederS. (2012). Researching my people, researching the “other”: Field experiences of two researchers along shifting positionalities. Quality and Quantity, 46(4), 1151–1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9677-4.
31.
ZubairM.MartinW.VictorC. (2012). Embodying gender, age, ethnicity and power in “the field”: Reflections on dress and the presentation of the self in research with older Pakistani muslims. Sociological Research Online, 17(3), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2667.
