Non-profit organizations that address gender-based violence must create diverse, inclusive, and equitable workplaces for advocates so that they can adequately serve diverse survivors. Despite recent efforts, differential treatment and high turnover among minority advocates continue. Further strategies to eliminate discriminative organizational practices are needed. We interviewed 25 advocates employed by non-profit organizations in a Southeastern state to examine how race, ethnicity, gender, and sexuality shape their work experiences. Guided by constructivist grounded theory and intersectionality, data analysis yielded four major themes that covered white dominance in advocacy, essentialized womanhood and heteronormativity, serving communities of color, working in the Deep South. Patriarchal values, religious norms, and gender roles influenced how advocates’ work was received by the communities. Racial/ethnic minority, and sexual and/or gender minority advocates faced discrimination, tokenism, and negative stereotypes. Transforming organizational climate and policies is necessary to support minority advocates’ work engagement and ability to serve marginalized communities.
ArmstrongE. A.Gleckman-KrutM.JohnsonL. (2018). Silence, power, and inequality: An intersectional approach to sexual violence. Annual Review of Sociology, 44(1), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041410
3.
ArnoldG.AkeJ. (2013). Reframing the narrative of the battered women’s movement. Violence Against Women, 19(5), 557–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213490508
4.
BergerR. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475
5.
CayirE.SpencerM.BillingsD.Hilfinger MessiasD. K.RobillardA.CunninghamT. (2020). “The Only Way We’ll Be Successful”: Organizational Factors That Influence Psychosocial Well-Being and Self-Care Among Advocates Working to Address Gender-Based Violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519897340.
6.
CharmazK. (2011). Grounded theory methods in social justice research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 359–380). SAGE.
ChoS.CrenshawK. W.McCallL. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs, 38(4), 785–810. https://doi.org/10.1086/669608
10.
ChowJ. C. C.AustinM. J. (2008). The culturally responsive social service agency: The application of an evolving definition to a case study. Administration in Social Work, 32(4), 39–64.
ColeE. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64(3), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014564
13.
CollinsP. H. (2002). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.
14.
ConleeD. (2012). Gender roles in organizations in the southeastern United States. Gonzaga University.
15.
CottinghamM. D.JohnsonA. H.EricksonR. J. (2018). “I can never be too comfortable”: Race, gender, and emotion at the hospital bedside. Qualitative Health Research, 28(1), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317737980
16.
CowanG.UllmanJ. B. (2006). Ingroup rejection among women: The role of personal inadequacy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(4), 399–409.
17.
CrenshawK. (2018). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics [1989]. Routledge.
18.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. SAGE.
19.
DillB. T.KohlmanM. H. (2012). Intersectionality: A transformative paradigm in feminist theory and social justice. In DillB. T.KohlmanM. H. (Eds.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 154–174). SAGE.
20.
FongL. G. W.GibbsJ. T. (1995). Facilitating services to multicultural communities in a dominant culture setting. Administration in Social Work, 19(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v19n02_01
21.
FryerC. S.PassmoreS. R.MaiettaR. C.PetruzzelliJ.CasperE.BrownN. A.. . . QuinnS. C. (2016). The symbolic value and limitations of racial concordance in minority research engagement. Qualitative Health Research, 26(6), 830–841.
22.
GalupoM. P.ResnickC. A. (2016). Experiences of LGBT microaggressions in the workplace: Implications for policy. In KöllenT. (Ed.), Sexual orientation and transgender issues in organizations (pp. 271–287). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29623-4_16
23.
GriffithD. M.ChildsE. L.EngE.JeffriesV. (2007). Racism in organizations: The case of a county public health department. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20149
24.
GrosjeanP. (2014). A history of violence: The culture of honor and homicide in the us south. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12(5), 1285–1316. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12096
25.
HamedS.Thapar-björkertS.BradbyH.AhlbergB. M. (2020). Racism in European health care: Structural violence and beyond. Qualitative Health Research, 30(11), 1662–1673. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320931430
26.
HancockA.-M. (2007). When multiplication doesn’t equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707070065
27.
HardestyJ. L.OswaldR. F.KhawL.FonsecaC. (2011). Lesbian/bisexual mothers and intimate partner violence: Help seeking in the context of social and legal vulnerability. Violence Against Women, 17(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801209347636
28.
HomerR. L. (2014, January). In the (radical) pursuit of self-care: Feminist participatory action research with victim advocates [Scholar commons].https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/etd/5242/
29.
INCITE!. (2007). The revolution will not be funded: Beyond the non-profit industrial complex (Incite! Women of Color Against Violence, Ed.). South End Press.
30.
JanssonS. M.BenoitC.CaseyL.PhillipsR.BurnsD. (2010). In for the Long Haul: Knowledge translation between academic and nonprofit organizations. Qualitative Health Research, 20(1), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309349808
31.
JonesK. P.PeddieC. I.GilraneV. L.KingE. B.GrayA. L. (2016). Not so subtle: A meta-analytic investigation of the correlates of subtle and overt discrimination. Journal of Management, 42(6), 1588–1613. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313506466
32.
KanterR. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. Basic Books.
33.
KapurS.ZajicekA. M.GaberJ. (2017). Nonprofit organizations serving domestic violence survivors: Addressing intersectional needs of Asian Indians. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 32(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109915592669
34.
KeaneK. (2009). Second-wave feminism in the American south, 1965–1980. University of Maryland.
35.
KingD. L. (2017, May). Organizational diversity philosophies and minority representation: Testing perceptions of safety and threat in the workplace. Purdue University.
36.
KingE. B.HeblM. R.GeorgeJ. M.MatusikS. F. (2010). Understanding tokenism: Antecedents and consequences of a psychological climate of gender inequity. Journal of Management, 36(2), 482–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308328508
37.
KolivoskiK.WeaverA.Constance-HugginsM. (2014). Critical race theory: Opportunities for application in social work practice and policy. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 95(4), 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.2014.95.36
38.
KrayL. J.ShirakoA. (2011). Stereotype threat in organizations: An examination of its scope, triggers, and possible interventions. In InzlichtM.SchmaderT. (Eds.), Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application (pp. 173–187). Oxford University Press.
39.
KulkarniS. (2019). Intersectional trauma-informed intimate partner violence (IPV) services: Narrowing the gap between IPV service delivery and survivor needs. Journal of Family Violence, 34(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-018-0001-5
40.
KulkarniS.BellH.HartmanJ. L.Herman-SmithR. L. (2013). Exploring individual and organizational factors contributing to compassion satisfaction, secondary traumatic stress, and burnout in domestic violence service providers. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 4(2), 114–130. https://doi.org/10.5243/jsswr.2013.8
41.
MehrotraG. R.KimballE.WahabS. (2016). The braid that binds us: The impact of neoliberalism, criminalization, and professionalization on domestic violence work. Affilia, 31(2), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109916643871
42.
MontesantiS. R.ThurstonW. E. (2015). Mapping the role of structural and interpersonal violence in the lives of women: Implications for public health interventions and policy. BMC Women’s Health, 15(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-015-0256-4
43.
MooreL.VannemanR. (2003). Context matters: Effects of the proportion of fundamentalists on gender attitudes. Social Forces, 82(1), 115–139. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2003.0099
44.
MorseJ. M.BarrettM.MayanM.OlsonK.SpiersJ. (2008). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2011328
45.
NadalK. L.WhitmanC. N.DavisL. S.ErazoT.DavidoffK. C. (2016). Microaggressions toward lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and genderqueer people: A review of the literature. Journal of Sex Research, 53(4–5), 488–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1142495
46.
OffermannL. R.BasfordT. E.GraebnerR.JafferS.De GraafS. B.KaminskyS. E. (2014). See no evil: Color blindness and perceptions of subtle racial discrimination in the workplace. In. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(4), 499–1507. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037237
47.
PlautV. C.ThomasK. M.HeblM. R. (2014). Race and ethnicity in the workplace: Spotlighting the perspectives of historically stigmatized groups. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(4), 479–482. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037544
48.
RagavanM. I.ThomasK. A.FulambarkerA.ZaricorJ.GoodmanL. A.Bair-MerrittM. H. (2018). Exploring the needs and lived experiences of racial and ethnic minority domestic violence survivors through community-based participatory research: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 21, 946–963. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018813204
49.
RichieB. E. (2015). Converge! Reimagining the movement to end gender violence symposium. In Reimagining the movement to end gender violence: Anti-racism, prison abolition, women of color feminisms, and other radical visions of justice. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/214374687.pdf
50.
SaldañaJ. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
51.
SkovholtT. M.Trotter-MathisonM. (2016). The resilient practitioner: Burnout and compassion fatigue prevention and self-care strategies for the helping professions. Routledge.
SpruillM. J. (2012). Victoria Eslinger, Keller Bumgardner Barron, Mary Heriot, Tootsie Holland, and Pat Callair: Champions of women’s rights in South Carolina. In JohnsonJ. M.SpruillM. J.LittlefieldV. W. (Eds.), South Carolina women: Their lives and times (Vol. 3, pp. 373–408). University of Georgia Press.
WalterA. W.RuizY.TourseR. W. C.KressH.MorningstarB.MacArthurB.DanielsA. (2016). Leadership matters: How hidden biases perpetuate institutional racism in organizations. Human Service Organizations Management, Leadership and Governance, 41(3), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2016.1249584
58.
WingfieldA. H.WingfieldJ. H. (2014). When visibility hurts and helps: How intersections of race and gender shape Black professional men’s experiences with tokenization. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(4), 483–490. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035761
59.
Woods-GiscombéC. L. (2010). Superwoman schema: African American women’s views on stress, strength, and health. Qualitative Health Research, 20(5), 668–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732310361892
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
