The Balance of Patient Involvement: Patients’ and Health Professionals’ Perspectives on Decision-Making in the Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer

Abstract

Research has shown that involving patients in decisions on treatment may have positive effects for patients. However, there are different understandings of what involving patients implies and different attitudes among physicians toward sharing decisions with patients. This study aimed to explore the attitude of patients with advanced prostate cancer to involvement in treatment decisions and physicians’ and nurses’ approach to patient involvement. Moreover, it aimed to explore whether the decision-making changes as the treatment course progresses. Data were collected through participant observations and interviews. It was found that treatment decisions are primarily considered as part of physicians’ role. Physicians’ attitudes to patient involvement in treatment decisions depended on the type of treatment. Among patients and health professionals, there was a lack of confidence in the ability of patients to participate in the decisions. Health professionals and patients have different attitudes toward patient involvement and different views on what it entails.

Keywords

advanced prostate cancer patient involvement communication patient-centered health care patients’ attitudes to involvement shared decision-making treatment-related decisions participant observation qualitative interviews Ricoeur interpretation theory qualitative phenomenological-hermeneutic approach qualitative longitudinal design Denmark Europe

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahmad

Ellins

Krelle

Lawrie

(2014). Person centred care from ideas to action. Bringing together the evidence on shared decision making and self-management support:. The Health Foundation. https://www.health.org.uk/publications/person-centred-care-from-ideas-to-action

Bray

Ferlay

Soerjomataram

Siegel

R. L.

Torre

L. A.

Jemal

(2018). Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 68(6), 394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492

Brom

Hopmans

Pasman

H. R. W.

Timmermans

D. R. M.

Widdershoven

G. A. M.

Onwuteaka-Philipsen

B. D.

(2014). Congruence between patients’ preferred and perceived participation in medical decision-making: A review of the literature. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 14(1), Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-14-25

Brom

Pasman

H. R.

Widdershoven

G. A.

van der Vorst

M. J.

Reijneveld

J. C.

Postma

T. J.

Onwuteaka-Philipsen

B. D.

(2014). Patients’ preferences for participation in treatment decision-making at the end of life: Qualitative interviews with advanced cancer patients. PLOS ONE, 9, Article e100435.

Cohen

Britten

(2003). Who decides about prostate cancer treatment? A qualitative study. Family Practice, 20(6), 724–729. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmg617

Coulter

(2011). Engaging patients in healthcare. Open University Press.

Dahlberg

Nyström

(2008). Reflective lifeworld research. Studentlitteratur.

Fischer

Visser

Voerman

Garssen

Andel

G. V.

Bensing

(2006). Treatment decision making in prostate cancer: Patients’ participation in complex decisions. Patient Education and Counseling, 63(3), 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2006.07.009

Fog

(2004). Med samtalen som udgangspunkt: det kvalitative forskningsinterview [With the conversation as a starting point: The qualitative research interview]. Akademisk Forlag.

10.

Golabek

Belsey

Drewa

Kolodziej

Skoneczna

Milecki

Dobruch

Słojewski

Chłosta

P. L.

(2016). Evidence-based recommendations on androgen deprivation therapy for localized and advanced prostate cancer. Central European Journal of Urology, 69(2), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2016.812

11.

Gulbrandsen

Clayman

M. L.

Beach

M. C.

Han

P. K.

Boss

E. F.

Ofstad

E. H.

Elwyn

(2016). Shared decision-making as an existential journey: Aiming for restored autonomous capacity. Patient Education and Counseling, 99(9), 1505–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.014

12.

Gulbrandsen

Dalby

A. M.

Ofstad

E. H.

Gerwing

(2014). Confusion in and about shared decision making in hospital outpatient encounters. Patient Education and Counseling, 96(3), 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.012

13.

Handforth

Burkinshaw

Freeman

Brown

J. E.

Snowden

J. A.

Coleman

R. E.

Greenfield

D. M.

(2019). Comprehensive geriatric assessment and decision-making in older men with incurable but manageable (chronic) cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 27(5), 1755–1763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4410-z

14.

Kvale

Brinkmann

(2015). Interview: det kvalitative forskningsinterview som håndværk [Interview: The qualitative interview as a craft] (3rd ed.). Hans Reitzels Forlag.

15.

Lehto

U.-S.

Helander

Taari

Aromaa

(2014). Patient experiences at diagnosis and psychological well-being in prostate cancer: A Finnish national survey. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 19(3), 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2014.10.018

16.

Loewenstein

(2005). Hot-cold empathy gaps and medical decision making. Health Psychology, 24(4, Suppl.), S49–S56. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S49

17.

Lord

Gale

(2014). Subjective experience or objective process: Understanding the gap between values and practice for involving patients in designing patient-centred care. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 28(6), 714–730. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-08-2013-0160

18.

Malterud

, (2001). Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet, 358(9280), 483–488.

19.

Martin

H. M.

Navne

L. E.

Lipczak

(2013). Involvement of patients with cancer in patient safety: A qualitative study of current practices, potentials and barriers. BMJ Quality and Safety, 22(10), 836–842. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001447

20.

Mol

(2008). The logic of care: Health and the problem of patient choice. Routledge.

21.

Nanton

Docherty

Meystre

Dale

(2009). Finding a pathway: Information and uncertainty along the prostate cancer patient journey. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14(3), 437–458. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910708X342890

22.

Netsey-Afedo

M. L.

Birkelund

(2016). Prostate cancer patients’ experience of involvement in decision-making. A phenomenological hermeneutic study. European Journal for Person Centered Healthcare, 4(2), 296–304. https://doi.org/10.5750/ejpch.v4i2.1083

23.

Olsen

(2003). Veje til kvalitativ kvalitet? Om kvalitetssikring af kvalitativ interviewforskning [Ways to qualitative quality? About quality control of qualitative interview research]. Nordic Studies in Education, 23(1), 1–20.

24.

Pieterse

A. H.

Bomhof-Roordink

Stiggelbout

A. M.

(2018). On how to define and measure SDM. Patient Education and Counseling, 101(8), 1307–1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.06.001

25.

Pollard

Bansback

Bryan

(2015). Physician attitudes toward shared decision making: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 98(9), 1046–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.05.004

26.

Ricoeur

(1973). Filosofiens kilder [ The sources of philosophy ]. Vinten.

27.

Ricoeur

(1976). Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. The Texas Christian University Press.

28.

Salmon

Young

(2017). A new paradigm for clinical communication: Critical review of literature in cancer care. Medical Education, 51(3), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13204

29.

Sountoulides

Rountos

(2013). Adverse effects of androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: Prevention and management. ISRN Urology, 2013, Article 240108. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/240108

30.

Spradley

J. P.

(1980). Participant observation. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

31.

Stiggelbout

A. M.

Pieterse

A. H.

Haes

J. C. J. M. D.

(2015). Shared decision making: Concepts, evidence, and practice. Patient Education and Counseling, 98(10), 1172–1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.06.022

32.

Tariman

J. D.

Berry

D. L.

Cochrane

Doorenbos

Schepp

(2009). Preferred and actual participation roles during health care decision making in persons with cancer: A systematic review. Annals of Oncology, 21(6), 1145–1151. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdp534

33.

Thorne

Oliffe

J. L.

Stajduhar

K. I.

(2013). Communicating shared decision-making: Cancer patient perspectives. Patient Education and Counseling, 90(3), 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.02.018

34.

Vahdat

Hamzehgardeshi

Hessam

Hamzehgardeshi

(2014). Patient involvement in health care decision making: A review. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 16(1), Article e12454. https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.12454

35.

van Houtum

Rijken

Heijmans

Groenewegen

(2013). Self-management support needs of patients with chronic illness: Do needs for support differ according to the course of illness? Patient Education and Counseling, 93(3), 626–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.08.021

36.

World Health Organization. (2014). Metastatic prostate cancer. 2014 Review of cancer medicines on the WHO List of essential medicines. Union for International Cancer Control.

37.

World Health Organization. (2018). Cancer: Diagnosis and treatment. https://www.who.int/cancer/treatment/en/

38.

Zacho

H. D.

Barsi

Mortensen

J. C.

Mogensen

M. K.

Bertelsen

Josephsen

Petersen

L. J.

(2014). Prospective multicenter study of bone scintigraphy in consecutive patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Clinical Nuclear Medicine, 39(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000000291