Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-7
Patient Flow or the Patient’s Journey? Exploring Health Care Providers’ Experiences and Understandings of Implementing a Care Pathway to Improve the Quality of Transitional Care for Older People
Internationally, the implementation of care pathways is a common strategy for making transitional care for older people more effective and patient-centered. Previous research highlights inherent tensions in care pathways, particularly in relation to their patient-centered aspects, which may cause dilemmas for health care providers. Health care providers’ understandings and experiences of this, however, remain unclear. Our aim was to explore health care providers’ experiences and understandings of implementing a care pathway to improve transitional care for older people. We conducted semistructured interviews with 20 health care providers and three key persons, along with participant observations of 22 meetings, in a Norwegian quality improvement collaborative. Through a thematic analysis, we identified an understanding of the care pathway as both patient flow and the patient’s journey and a dilemma between the two, and we discuss how the negotiation of conflicting institutional logics is a central part of care pathway implementation.
AllenD. (2009). From boundary concept to boundary object: The practice and politics of care pathway development. Social Science and Medicine, 69(3), 354–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.002
2.
AllenD. (2014). Lost in translation? “Evidence” and the articulation of institutional logics in integrated care pathways: From positive to negative boundary object?Sociology of Health and Illness, 36(6), 807–822. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12111
3.
AllenJ.HutchinsonA. M.BrownR.LivingstonP. M. (2014). Quality care outcomes following transitional care interventions for older people from hospital to home: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 14(1), Article 346. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-346
4.
AllenJ.HutchinsonA. M.BrownR.LivingstonP. M. (2017). User experience and care integration in transitional care for older people from hospital to home: A meta-synthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 27(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316658267
5.
AnderssonT.LiffR. (2018). Co-optation as a response to competing institutional logics: Professionals and managers in healthcare. Journal of Professions and Organization, 5(2), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joy001
6.
BarnesL. (2000). The social production of an enterprise clinic: Nurses, clinical pathway guidelines and contemporary healthcare practices. Nursing Inquiry, 7(3), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1800.2000.00070.x
7.
BeardJ. R.OfficerA.De CarvalhoI. A.SadanaR.PotA. M.MichelJ.-P.Lloyd-SherlockP.Epping-JordanJ. E.PeetersG. G.MahananiW. R. (2016). The world report on ageing and health: A policy framework for healthy ageing. The Lancet, 387(10033), 2145–2154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00516-4
8.
BeedholmK.FrederiksenK. (2019). Patient involvement and institutional logics: A discussion paper. Nursing Philosophy, 20(2), Article e12234. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12234
9.
Bendix AndersenA.BeedholmK.KolbækR.FrederiksenK. (2018). When clock time governs interaction: How time influences health professionals’ intersectoral collaboration. Qualitative Health Research, 28(13), 2059–2070. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318779046
10.
BergerP. L.LuckmannT. (1991). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguin Books.
11.
BerntsenG.StrislandF.Malm-NicolaisenK.SmaradottirB.FensliR.RøhneM. (2019). The evidence base for an ideal care pathway for frail multimorbid elderly: Combined scoping and systematic intervention review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(4), Article e12517. https://doi.org/10.2196/12517
BodeI.LangeJ.MärkerM. (2017). Caught in organized ambivalence: Institutional complexity and its implications in the German hospital sector. Public Management Review, 19(4), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1195437
ChecklandK.HammondJ. O. N.AllenP.ColemanA.Warwick-GilesL.HallA.MaysN.SuttonM. (2020). Road to nowhere? A critical consideration of the use of the metaphor “care pathway” in health services planning, organisation and delivery. Journal of Social Policy, 49(2), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279419000400
16.
DyrstadD. N.TestadI.AaseK.StormM. (2015). A review of the literature on patient participation in transitions of the elderly. Cognition, Technology & Work, 17(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-014-0300-4
17.
Evans-LackoS.JarrettM.McCroneP.ThornicroftG. (2010). Facilitators and barriers to implementing clinical care pathways. BMC Health Services Research, 10(1), Article 182. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-182
HallR.BelsonD.MuraliP.DessoukyM. (2006). Modeling patient flows through the healthcare system. In HallR. W. (Ed.), Patient flow: Reducing delay in healthcare delivery (pp. 1–44). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-33636-7_1
20.
HøyemA.GammonD.BerntsenG. R.SteinsbekkA. (2018). Policies make coherent care pathways a personal responsibility for clinicians: A discourse analysis of policy documents about coordinators in hospitals. International Journal of Integrated Care, 18(3), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.3617
21.
KvælL. A. H.DebesayJ.ByeA.LangaasA.BerglandA. (2019). Choice, voice, and coproduction in intermediate care: Exploring geriatric patients’ and their relatives’ perspectives on patient participation. SAGE Open, 9(3), Article 876318. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019876318
22.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
23.
MalterudK.SiersmaV. D.GuassoraA. D. (2015). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
24.
MaxwellJ. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). SAGE.
25.
McCanceT.McCormackB. (2017). The person-centred practice framework. In McCormackB.McCanceT. (Eds.), Person-centred practice in nursing and health care: Theory and practice (pp. 36–64). Wiley Blackwell.
26.
Mik-MeyerN.HaugaardM. (2017). The power of citizens and professionals in welfare encounters: The influence of bureaucracy, market and psychology (1st ed.). Manchester University Press.
27.
MoenK.MiddelthonA.-L. (2015). Qualitative research methods. In LaakeP.BenestadH.OlsenB. (Eds.), Research in medical and biological sciences (2nd ed., pp. 321–378). Academic Press.
OlsenC. F.DebesayJ.BerglandA.ByeA.LangaasA. G. (2020). What matters when asking, “what matters to you?” Perceptions and experiences of health care providers on involving older people in transitional care. BMC Health Services Research, 20, Article 317.
34.
PinderR.PetcheyR.ShawS.CarterY. (2005). What’s in a care pathway? Towards a cultural cartography of the new NHS. Sociology of Health and Illness, 27(6), 759–779. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00473.x
35.
RøsstadT.GaråsenH.SteinsbekkA.HålandE.KristoffersenL.GrimsmoA. (2015). Implementing a care pathway for elderly patients, a comparative qualitative process evaluation in primary care. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), Article 86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0751-1
36.
RøsstadT.GaråsenH.SteinsbekkA.SletvoldO.GrimsmoA. (2013). Development of a patient-centred care pathway across healthcare providers: A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 13, Article 121. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-121
37.
RøsstadT.SalvesenO.SteinsbekkA.GrimsmoA.SletvoldO.GaråsenH. (2017). Generic care pathway for elderly patients in need of home care services after discharge from hospital: A cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1), Article 275. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2206-3
38.
RiiskjærE. (2014). Patienten som partner: En nødvendig ide med ringe plads [The patient as partner: A necessary idea with little space]. Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
39.
RomørenT. I.TorjesenD. O.LandmarkB. (2011). Promoting coordination in Norwegian health care. International Journal of Integrated Care, 11, Article e127. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.581
40.
RotterT.KinsmanL.MachottaA.ZhaoF. L.van der WeijdenT.RonellenfitschU.ScottS. D. (2013). Clinical pathways for primary care: Effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, and costs. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010706
41.
SchrijversG. J. P.HoornA.v HuiskesN. (2012). The care pathway concept: Concepts and theories: An introduction. International Journal of Integrated Care, 12(6), Article 812. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.812
42.
ScottW. R. (2004). Competing logics in health care: Professional, state, and managerial. In DobbinF. (Ed.), The sociology of the economy (pp. 267–287). Russell Sage Foundation.
43.
SecklerE.RegauerV.RotterT.BauerP.MüllerM. (2020). Barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of multi-disciplinary care pathways in primary care: A systematic review. BMC Family Practice, 21(1), Article 113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01179-w
44.
SkogaasB. (2011). Conflicts and ambivalences: A case study of clinical pathways in Norway. Journal of Social Work Practice, 25(3), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2011.597182
ten DamE. M.WaardenburgM. (2020). Logic fluidity: How frontline professionals use institutional logics in their day-to-day work. Journal of Professions and Organization, 7(2), 188–204. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joaa012
47.
ThorntonP. H.OcasioW. (2008). Institutional logics. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.SahlinK. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–128). SAGE.
48.
TrebbleT. M.HansiN.HydesT.SmithM. A.BakerM. (2010). Process mapping the patient journey: An introduction. British Medical Journal, 341, Article c4078. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c4078
49.
van de BovenkampH. M.StoopendaalA.BalR. (2017). Working with layers: The governance and regulation of healthcare quality in an institutionally layered system. Public Policy and Administration, 32(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076716652934
50.
VanhaechtK.PanellaM.Van ZelmR.SermeusW. (2010). An overview on the history and concept of care pathways as complex interventions. International Journal of Care Pathways, 14(3), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1258/jicp.2010.010019
51.
WellsS.TamirO.GrayJ.NaidooD.BekhitM.GoldmannD. (2018). Are quality improvement collaboratives effective? A systematic review. British Medical Journal Quality and Safety, 27(3), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006926
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
