Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A qualitative egocentric social network approach was taken to explore motivations for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)-related communication between women who inject drugs and network members. Eligible participants were HIV-negative, 18 years or older, and participating in a PrEP demonstration project in Philadelphia, PA, USA. The study employed content analysis of in-depth interviews to identify themes related to contextual and relational factors impacting PrEP communication within networks. Participants (n = 20) named on average three network members, resulting in a total of 57 unique relationships. PrEP conversations occurred within 30 of the 57 relationships, and motivations were to benefit others, to benefit themselves, and due to a sense of obligation. Some conversations also occurred when a peer unexpectedly found their pills. Taking a qualitative approach to network analysis provided a nuanced understanding of how interpersonal characteristics motivated PrEP conversations. Network interventions that facilitate information diffusion and social support may increase PrEP uptake and adherence among women who inject drugs.

Keywords

substance use addiction altruism health behavior behavior communication social participation social networks community and public health disclosure confidentiality privacy health promotion health HIV/AIDS infection motivation qualitative content analysis egocentric network analysis Philadelphi Pennsylvania USA

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

L. M.

Balderson

B. H.

(2016). HIV providers’ likelihood to prescribe pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention differs by patient type: A short report. AIDS Care, 28(9), 1154–1158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2016.1153595

Archibald

(2018, October 24). HIV outbreak among homeless people worries health officials. Real Change. https://www.realchangenews.org/2018/10/24/hiv-outbreak-among-homeless-people-worries-health-officials

Barrington

Gandhi

Gill

Villa Torres

Brietzke

M. P.

Hightow-Weidman

(2018). Social networks, migration, and HIV testing among Latinos in a new immigrant destination: Insights from a qualitative study. Global Public Health, 13(10), 1507–1519. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2017.1409783

Barrington

Latkin

Sweat

M. D.

Moreno

Ellen

Kerrigan

(2009). Talking the talk, walking the walk: Social network norms, communication patterns, and condom use among the male partners of female sex workers in La Romana, Dominican Republic. Social Science & Medicine, 68(11), 2037–2044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.03.009

Bazeley

Jackson

(2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Sage.

Biello

Bazzi

Mimiaga

Biancarelli

Edeza

Salhaney

. . . Drainoni

(2018). Perspectives on HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) utilization and related intervention needs among people who inject drugs. Harm Reduction Journal, 15(1), Article 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-018-0263-5

Birks

Chapman

Francis

(2008). Memoing in qualitative research: Probing data and processes. Journal of Research in Nursing, 13(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987107081254

Bryant

Brener

Hull

Treloar

(2010). Needle sharing in regular sexual relationships: An examination of serodiscordance, drug using practices, and the gendered character of injecting. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 107(2), 182–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.10.007

Bungay

(2013). Health care among street-involved women: The perpetuation of health inequity. Qualitative Health Research, 23(8), 1016–1026. doi 10.1177/1049732313493352

10.

Burt

R. S.

(1984). Network items and the general social survey. Social Networks, 6(4), 293–339.

11.

Carpentier

Ducharme

(2005). Support network transformations in the first stages of the caregiver’s career. Qualitative Health Research, 15(3), 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304270813

12.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in the United States, 2017 [Clinical practice guideline]. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/risk/prep/cdc-hiv-prep-guidelines-2017.pdf

13.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018). HIV surveillance reports, 2017. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hiv-surveillance.html

14.

Centola

(2011). An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior. Science, 334(6060), 1269–1272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207055

15.

Convey

M. R.

Dickson-Gomez

Weeks

M. R.

(2010). Altruism and peer-led HIV prevention targeting heroin and cocaine users. Qualitative Health Research, 20(11), 1546–1557. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732310375818

16.

Dawson

Kates

(2018). HIV and the opioid epidemic: 5 key points. https://www.kff.org/hivaids/issue-brief/hiv-and-the-opioid-epidemic-5-key-points/

17.

Cox

Boivin

J. F.

Platt

R. W.

Jolly

A. M.

(2007). The importance of social networks in their association to drug equipment sharing among injection drug users: A review. Addiction, 102(11), 1730–1739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01936.x

18.

DeMio

(2018, October 24). CDC called in to investigate HIV surges in the Cincinnati region. The Enquirer. https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2018/10/24/ohio-kentucky-ask-cdc-help-hiv-cases-linked-injected-drugs-rise-cincinnati/1684956002/

19.

Dupuis-Blanchard

Neufeld

Strang

V. R.

(2009). The significance of social engagement in relocated older adults. Qualitative Health Research, 19(9), 1186–1195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309343956

20.

Edelman

E. J.

Moore

B. A.

Calabrese

S. K.

Berkenblit

Cunningham

Patel

. . . Fiellin

D. A.

(2017). Primary care physicians’ willingness to prescribe HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis for people who inject drugs. AIDS and Behavior, 21(4), 1025–1033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1612-6

21.

El-Bassel

Gilbert

Rajah

Foleno

Frye

(2001). Social support among women in methadone treatment who experience partner violence: Isolation and male controlling behavior. Violence Against Women, 7(3), 246–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778010122182433

22.

El-Bassel

Shaw

S. A.

Dasgupta

Strathdee

S. A.

(2014). People who inject drugs in intimate relationships: It takes two to combat HIV. Current HIV/AIDS Reports, 11(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-013-0192-6

23.

Erlingsson

Brysiewicz

(2017). A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 7(3), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001

24.

Escudero

D. J.

Kerr

Wood

Nguyen

Lurie

M. N.

Sued

Marshall

B. D. L.

(2015). Acceptability of HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) among People who Inject Drugs (PWID) in a Canadian setting. AIDS and Behavior, 19(5), 752–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-014-0867-z

25.

Farris

C. A.

Fenaughty

A. M.

(2002). Social isolation and domestic violence among female drug users. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 28(2), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1081/ADA-120002977

26.

Fisher

(2005). Using egocentric networks to understand communication. IEEE Internet Computing, 9(5), 20–28. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/ieee_egocentric.pdf

27.

Fothergill

K. E.

Ensminger

M. E.

Robertson

Green

K. M.

Thorpe

R. J.

Juon

H.-S.

(2011). Effects of social integration on health: A prospective study of community engagement among African American women. Social Science & Medicine, 72(2), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.10.024

28.

Friedman

S. R.

Maslow

Bolyard

Sandoval

Mateu-Gelabert

Neaigus

(2004). Urging others to be healthy: “Intravention” by injection drug users as a community prevention goal. AIDS Education and Prevention, 16(3), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.16.3.250.35439

29.

Fuhse

Mützel

(2011). Tackling connections, structure, and meaning in networks: Quantitative and qualitative methods in sociological network research. Quality & Quantity, 45(5), 1067–1089.

30.

Goldsmith

D. J.

(2004). Communicating social support. Cambridge University Press.

31.

Heath

Kerr

Kaplan

Suwannawong

Wood

Hayashi

(2016). Healthcare avoidance by people who inject drugs in Bangkok, Thailand. Journal of Public Health, 38(3), e301–e308. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdv143

32.

Hennink

M. M.

Kaiser

B. N.

Marconi

V. C.

(2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough? Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 591–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344

33.

Holt-Lunstad

Uchino

(2015). Social support and health. In Glanz

Rimer

B. K.

Viswanath

K. V.

(Eds.), Health behavior: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 183–204). Jossey-Bass.

34.

Huang

G. C.

Unger

J. B.

Soto

Fujimoto

Pentz

M. A.

Jordan-Marsh

Valente

T. W.

(2014). Peer influences: The impact of online and offline friendship networks on adolescent smoking and alcohol use. Journal of Adolescent Health, 54(5), 508–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.07.001

35.

Kadushin

(2012). Understanding social networks: Theories, concepts, and findings. Oxford University Press, USA.

36.

Klassen

B. J.

Lachowsky

N. J.

Lin

S. Y.

Edward

J. B.

Chown

S. A.

Hogg

R. S.

. . . Roth

E. A.

(2017). Gay men’s understanding and education of new HIV prevention technologies in Vancouver, Canada. Qualitative Health Research, 27(12), 1775–1791. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317716419

37.

Koehly

L. M.

Peterson

S. K.

Watts

B. G.

Kempf

K. K.

Vernon

S. W.

Gritz

E. R.

(2003). A social network analysis of communication about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genetic testing and family functioning. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 12(4), 304–313.

38.

Kuo

Olsen

Patrick

Phillips

II Magnus

Opoku

. . . Greenberg

(2016). Willingness to use HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among community-recruited, older people who inject drugs in Washington, DC. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 164, 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.02.044

39.

Latkin

C. A.

(1998). Outreach in natural settings: The use of peer leaders for HIV prevention among injecting drug users’ networks. Public Health Reports, 113(Suppl. 1), 151–159.

40.

Latkin

C. A.

Hua

Davey

M. A.

(2004). Factors associated with peer HIV prevention outreach in drug-using communities. AIDS Education and Prevention, 16(6), 499–508. https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.16.6.499.53794

41.

Liu

(2016). Egocentric network and condom use among mid-age female sex workers in China: A multilevel modeling analysis. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 30(4), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2015.0349

42.

Luoma

J. B.

Twohig

M. P.

Waltz

Hayes

S. C.

Roget

Padilla

Fisher

(2007). An investigation of stigma in individuals receiving treatment for substance abuse. Addictive Behaviors, 32(7), 1331–1346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.09.008

43.

MacIntyre

(1967). Egoism and altruism. In Edwards

(Ed.), The encyclopedia of philosophy (pp. 426–466). Macmillan.

44.

Mason

(2010). Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11. https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1428

45.

Massachusetts Department of Public Health. (2018). CDC joins Department of Public Health in investigating HIV cluster among people who inject drugs. https://www.mass.gov/news/cdc-joins-department-of-public-health-in-investigating-hiv-cluster-among-people-who-inject

46.

McPherson

Smith-Lovin

Cook

J. M.

(2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415

47.

Montgomery

C. M.

Lees

Stadler

Morar

N. S.

Ssali

Mwanza

. . . Pool

(2008). The role of partnership dynamics in determining the acceptability of condoms and microbicides. AIDS Care, 20(6), 733–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540120701693974

48.

Moreno

C. L.

(2007). The relationship between culture, gender, structural factors, abuse, trauma, and HIV/AIDS for Latinas. Qualitative Health Research, 17(3), 340–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306297387

49.

Mutchler

M. G.

McDavitt

Ghani

M. A.

Nogg

Winder

T. J. A.

Soto

J. K.

(2015). Getting PrEPared for HIV prevention navigation: Young black gay men talk about HIV prevention in the biomedical era. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 29(9), 490–502. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2015.0002

50.

Neaigus

Reilly

K. H.

Jenness

S. M.

Hagan

Wendel

Gelpi-Acosta

(2013). Dual HIV risk: Receptive syringe sharing and unprotected sex among HIV-negative injection drug users in New York City. AIDS and Behavior, 17, 2501–2509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-013-0496-y

51.

Newcomb

M. E.

Mongrella

M. C.

Weis

McMillen

S. J.

Mustanski

(2016). Partner disclosure of PrEP use and undetectable viral load on geosocial networking apps: Frequency of disclosure and decisions about condomless sex. JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 71(2), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1097/qai.0000000000000819

52.

Nyamathi

A. M.

Lewis

Leake

Flaskerud

Bennett

(1995). Barriers to condom use and needle cleaning among impoverished minority female injection drug users and partners of injection drug users. Public Health Reports, 110(2), 166–172.

53.

Orchard

Murie

Salter

Elash

H.-L.

Bunch

Middleton

Benoit

(2020). Balance, capacity, and the contingencies of everyday life: Narrative etiologies of health among women in street-based sex work. Qualitative Health Research, 30, 518–529.

54.

Perry

B. L.

Pescosolido

B. A.

Borgatti

S. P.

(2018). Egocentric network analysis: Foundations, methods, and models. Cambridge University Press.

55.

Pilgrim

Jani

Mathur

Kahabuka

Saria

Makyao

. . . Pulerwitz

(2018). Provider perspectives on PrEP for adolescent girls and young women in Tanzania: The role of provider biases and quality of care. PLoS ONE, 13(4), Article e0196280. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196280

56.

Polit

D. F.

Beck

C. T.

(2008). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2013.04.001

57.

Rogers

E. M.

(1995). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.

58.

Scott

Carrington

P. J.

(2011). The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. Sage.

59.

Seeman

T. E.

(1996). Social ties and health: The benefits of social integration. Annals of Epidemiology, 6(5), 442–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-2797(96)00095-6

60.

Shrestha

Copenhaver

(2018). Exploring the use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention among high-risk people who use drugs in treatment. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, Article 195. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00195

61.

Shrestha

Karki

Altice

F. L.

(2017). Correlates of willingness to initiate pre-exposure prophylaxis and anticipation of practicing safer drug- and sex-related behaviors among high-risk drug users on methadone treatment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 173, 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.12.023

62.

Stein

Thurmond

Bailey

(2014). Willingness to use HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among opiate users. AIDS and Behavior, 18(9), 1694–1700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-014-0778-z

63.

Theall

K. P.

Sterk

C. E.

Elifson

K. W.

Kidder

(2003). Factors associated with positive HIV serostatus among women who use drugs: Continued evidence for expanding factors of influence. Public Health Reports, 118(5), 415–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0033-3549(04)50273-x

64.

Tillema

Dijst

Schwanen

(2010). Face-to-face and electronic communications in maintaining social networks: The influence of geographical and relational distance and of information content. New Media & Society, 12(6), 965–983. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809353011

65.

Tobin

K. E.

Kuramoto

S. J.

Davey-Rothwell

M. A.

Latkin

C. A.

(2011). The STEP into Action study: A peer-based, personal risk network-focused HIV prevention intervention with injection drug users in Baltimore, Maryland. Addiction, 106(2), 366–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03146.x

66.

Tsai

A. C.

Lucas

Kawachi

(2015). Association between social integration and suicide among women in the United States. JAMA Psychiatry, 72(10), 987–993. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.1002

67.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2018). What is the U.S. opioid epidemic? https://www.hhs.gov/opioids/about-the-epidemic/index.html

68.

Van der Elst

E. M.

Mbogua

Operario

Mutua

Kuo

Mugo

. . . Sanders

E. J

. (2013). High acceptability of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis but challenges in adherence and use: Qualitative insights from a phase I trial of intermittent and daily PrEP in at-risk populations in Kenya. AIDS and Behavior, 17(6), 2162–2172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-012-0317-8

69.

van der Straten

Stadler

Montgomery

Hartmann

Magazi

Mathebula

. . . Soto-Torres

. (2014). Women’s experiences with oral and vaginal pre-exposure prophylaxis: The VOICE-C qualitative study in Johannesburg, South Africa. PLoS ONE, 9(2), Article e89118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089118

70.

Walters

S. M.

Reilly

K. H.

Neaigus

Braunstein

(2017). Awareness of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among women who inject drugs in NYC: The importance of networks and syringe exchange programs for HIV prevention. Harm Reduction Journal, 14(1), Article 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-017-0166-x

71.

Ware

N. C.

Wyatt

M. A.

Haberer

J. E.

Baeten

J. M.

Kintu

Psaros

. . . Bangsberg

D. R.

(2012). What’s love got to do with it? Explaining adherence to oral antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV-serodiscordant couples. JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 59(5), 463–468. https://doi.org/10.1097/qai.0b013e31824a060b

72.

World Health Organization. (2015). Policy brief: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): WHO expands recommendation on oral pre-exposure prophylaxis of HIV infection (PrEP). https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/197906

73.

Worth

(1989). Sexual decision-making and AIDS: Why condom promotion among vulnerable women is likely to fail. Studies in Family Planning, 20(6), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/1966433

74.

Zhou

Y. R.

(2008). Endangered womanhood: Women’s experiences with HIV/AIDS in China. Qualitative Health Research, 18(8), 1115–1126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308319924

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB

Motivations for PrEP-Related Interpersonal Communication Among Women Who Inject Drugs: A Qualitative Egocentric Network Study

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material