This qualitative study is conducted via focus groups with 47 Australian public service interpreters to investigate their responses to vicarious trauma (VT) in their practice, the influence of culture, and their views on how to maintain mental well-being. While participant interpreters employ various strategies to deal with traumatic client content and other work stressors, cultural inhibitors are found to prevent some from sharing their emotional vulnerability or seeking professional help. They indicated that they want to be treated with respect and as part of the professional team, rather than a machine or a shadow. Professional development is needed to clarify the limits of confidentiality, explain trauma and its vicarious possibilities, and to establish interpreters’ professional entitlement to briefing and debriefing. Stakeholders including educators, professional associations, interpreting agencies, and other professions and institutional users of interpreting services should work respectfully and collaboratively to prevent and help interpreters recover from VT.
BeckerR.BowlesR. (2001). Interpreters’ experience of working in a triadic psychotherapy relationship with survivors of torture and trauma: Some thoughts on the impacts on psychotherapy. In RaphaelB.MalakA. -E. (Eds.), Diversity and mental health in challenging times (Monograph No. 8 in series “Culture and mental health: Current issues in transcultural mental health”) (pp. 222–230). Transcultural Mental Health Unit.
10.
BertholdM.FischmanY. (2014). Social work with trauma survivors: Collaboration with interpreters. Social Work, 59(2), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swu011
11.
BontempoK.MalcolmK. (2012). An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure: Education interpreters about the risk of vicarious trauma in healthcare settings. In MalcolmK.SwabeyL. (Eds.), In our hands: Educating healthcare interpreters (pp. 105–130). Gallaudet University Press.
12.
BrämbergB.DahlbergK. (2013). Interpreters in cross-cultural interviews: A three-way coconstruction of data. Qualitative Health Research, 23(2), 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312467705
13.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
14.
BrownJ.MulhernG.JosephS. (2002). Incident-related stressors, locus of control, coping and psychological distress among firefighters in Northern Ireland. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 15(2), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014816309959
15.
ButowP. N.LobbE.JeffordM.GoldsteinD.EisenbruchM.GirgisA.KingM.SzeM.AldridgeL.SchofieldP. (2012). A bridge between cultures: Interpreters’ perspectives of consultations with migrant oncology patients. Support Care Cancer, 20, 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-1046-z
16.
CarpenterC. (2017). Phenomenology and rehabilitation research. In LiamputtongP.AndersonK.BondasT. (Eds.), Research methods in health (3rd ed., pp. 157–176). Oxford University Press.
17.
ChesherT. (1997). Rhetoric and reality: Two decades of community interpreting and translating in Australia. In CarrS. E.RobertsR. P.DufourA.SteynD. (Eds.), The critical link: Interpreters in the community (pp. 277–289). John Benjamins.
18.
ClareK. (2000). Recognising our humaness: Minimising the impact of interpreting on our professional and personal selves [Paper presentation]. AUSIT 13th National Annual General Meeting, Jill Blewett Memorial Lecture, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. https://ausit.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/2000_jbl.pdf
19.
ClohessyS.EhlersA. (1999). PTSD symptoms, response to intrusive memories and coping in ambulance service workers. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(3), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466599162836
20.
CorsellisA. (2008). Public service interpreting—The first steps. Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
CoxK.SteinerS. (2013). Preserving commitment to social work service through the prevention of vicarious trauma. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 10(1), 52–60.
22.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among the five approaches. Sage.
23.
CrezeeI.JülichS.HaywardM. (2013). Issues for interpreters and professionals working in refugee settings. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 8(3), 253–273.
24.
CristianoM. (1998). De-rolement from personae among performing artists: Implications of personality type and role type [PhD thesis, Caribbean Centre for Advanced Studies].
25.
DarrochE.DempseyR. (2016). Interpreters’ experiences of transferential dynamics, vicarious traumatisation, and their need for support and supervision: A systematic literature review. The European Journal of Counselling Psychology, 4(2), 166–190. https://doi.org/0.5964/ejcop.v4i2.76
26.
DavidsonP. M.HalcombE. J.GholizadehL. (2017). Focus groups in health research. In LiamputtongP.AndersonK.BondasT. (Eds.), Research methods in health (3rd ed., pp. 84–104). Oxford University Press.
27.
DeanR. K.PollardR. Q. (2001). The application of demand-control theory to sign language interpreting: Implications for stress and interpreter training. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/6.1.1
DiaconescuM. (2015). Burnout, secondary trauma and compassion fatigue in social work. Revista de Asistenta Sociala, 14(3), 57–63.
30.
DohertyS. M.MacIntyreA. M.WyneT. (2010). How does it feel for you? The emotional impact and specific challenges of mental health interpreting. Mental Health Review Journal, 15(3), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.5042/mhrj.2010.0657
31.
EngstromD. W.RothT.HollisJ. (2010). The use of interpreters by torture treatment providers. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 19(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313200903547749
GomezA. (2012). Vicarious trauma and posttraumatic growth: A study of how interpreters working in psychotherapy are impacted by their work. Dublin Business School.
34.
GreenH.SperlingerD.CarswellK. (2012). Too close to home? Experiences of Kurdish refugee interpreters working in UK mental health services. Journal of Mental Health, 21(3), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2011.651659
35.
HarveyM. (2003). Shielding yourself from the perils of empathy: The case of sign language interpreters. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8, 207–213. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eng004
HolmgrenH.SøndergaardH.ElklitA. (2003). Stress and coping in traumatized interpreters—A pilot study of refugee interpreters working for a humanitarian organization. Intervention—International Journal of Mental Health, Psychosocial Work and Counselling in Areas of Armed Conflict, 1(3), 22–27.
38.
HsiehE. (2008). “I am not a robot!” Interpreters’ views of their roles in health care settings. Qualitative Health Research, 18(10), 1367–1383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308323840
39.
HycnerR. (1985). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. A Journal for Philosophy and the Social Sciences, 8(3), 279–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142995
KaganR.SchlosbergS. (1989). Families in perpetual crisis. W.W. Norton.
42.
KrugerD. (1988). An introduction to phenomenological psychology (2nd ed.). Juta.
43.
KurzI. (2003). Physiological stress during simultaneous interpreting: A comparison of experts and novices. Interpreters’ Newsletter, 12, 51–67. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/41171608.pdf
LasskenS. (2016). Persona non grata: A theoretical exploration of de-roling in drama therapy [Unpublished Master of Arts thesis, Condordia University].
46.
LeeS.JuonH.MartinezG.HsuC.RobinsonE.BawaJ.MaG. X. (2009). Model minority at risk: Expressed needs of mental health by Asian American young adults. Journal of Community Health, 34, 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-008-9137-1
47.
LiamputtongP. (2010). Performing qualitative cross-cultural research. Cambridge University Press.
48.
LiamputtongP. (2011). Focus group methodology: Principles and practice. Sage.
LiptonG.ArendsM.BastianK.WrightB.O’HaraP. (2002). The psychosocial consequences experienced by interpreters in relation to working with torture and trauma clients: A West Australian pilot study. Synergy, 3–17, 14–17.
51.
LoutanL.FarinelliT.PampallonaS. (1999). Medical interpreters have feelings too. Sozial und Präventivmedizin, 44, 280–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01358977
52.
McNiffJ. (2013). Action research: Principles and practice. Taylor & Francis.
53.
MehusC. J.BecherE. H. (2016). Secondary traumatic stress, burnout, and compassion satisfaction in a sample of spoken-language interpreters. Traumatology, 22(4), 249–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/trm0000023
54.
MichalopoulosL. M.AparicioE. (2012). Vicarious trauma in social workers: The role of trauma of trauma history, social support, and years of experience. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 21(6), 646–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2012.689422
55.
MillerK. E.MartellZ. L.PazdirekK.CaruthM.LopezD. (2005). The role of interpreters in psychotherapy with refugees: An exploratory study. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 75, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.75.1.27
NeumannD. A.GambleS. J. (1995). Issues in the professional development of psychotherapists: Countertransference and vicarious traumatization in the new trauma therapist. Psychotherapy, 32(2), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.32.2.341
60.
NguyenQ. C.AndersonL. P. (2005). Vietnamese Americans’ attitudes toward seeking mental health services: Relation to cultural variables. Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20039
61.
OrozcoG. L.LeeW. M. L.BlandoJ. A.ShooshaniB. (2014). Introduction to multicultural counseling for helping professionals. Taylor & Francis.
62.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
63.
PearlmanL. A.Mac IanP. S. (1995). Vicarious traumatization: An empirical study of the effects of trauma work on trauma therapists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26(6), 558–565. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.26.6.558
64.
PearlmanL. A.SaakvitneK. W. (1995). Treating therapists with vicarious traumatization and secondary traumatic stress disorders. In FigleyC. R. (Ed.), Compassion fatigue: Coping with secondary traumatic stress disorder in those who treat the traumatized (pp. 150–177). Brunner/Mazel.
65.
RassoolH. (2016). Islamic counselling: An introduction to theory and practice. Routledge.
66.
RaunickC. B.LindellD. F.MorrisD. L.BackmanT. (2015). Vicarious trauma among sexual assault nurse examiners. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 32(2), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1097/JFN.0000000000000085
67.
RobbA. E.DueC.VenningA. (2018). Exploring psychological wellbeing in a sample of Australian Actors. Australian Psychologist, 53, 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12221
68.
RobertsG. (2015). Public service interpreters: The emotional and psychological impact of interpreting within public service settings [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation in Clinical Psychology, Cardiff University]. http://orca.cf.ac.uk/76875/
ShlesingerY. (2007). Vicarious traumatization among interpreters who work with torture survivors and their therapists. In PöchhacherF.JakobsenA. L.MeesI. M. (Eds.), Interpreting studies and beyond: A tribute to Mariam Shlesinger (pp. 153–172). International Specialized Book Service Incorporated.
71.
SilveiraF. S.BoyerW. (2015). Vicarious resilience in counselors of child and youth victims of interpersonal trauma. Qualitative Health Research, 25(4), 513–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314552284
72.
SplevinsK. A.CohenK.JosephS.MurrayC.BowleyJ. (2010). Vicarious posttraumatic growth among interpreters. Qualitative Health Research, 20(12), 1705–1716. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732310377457
73.
Szlawieniec-HawD. I. (2018). The consequences of representing human suffering, distress, and/or violence [PhD thesis, York University]. http://hdl.handle.net/10315/35011
Valero-GarcésC. (2005). Emotional and psychological effects on interpreters in public services: A critical factor to bear in mind. Translational Journal, 9(3), 1–15.
76.
WilligC. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology (3rd ed.). Open University Press.
77.
WilsonF. (2016). Identifying, preventing, and addressing job burnout and vicarious burnout for social work professionals. Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 13(5), 479–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2016.1166856
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
