Contemporary practice has started to rethink use of outdoor and community environments for advancing comprehensive rehabilitation outcomes. The aim is to examine health professionals’ experiences and perceptions of providing rehabilitation in outdoor community settings. The purpose is to use these experiences to generate practice-based knowledge in using the outdoors as a means to guide community-based rehabilitation. The Interpretive Description methodology was accompanied by social practice theory. Fieldwork was conducted utilizing participant observation, photovoice, and focus-group interviews. Included were 27 health professionals. The analysis revealed how “naturalistic learning opportunities” offered health professionals strategies to empower activity and participation levels and yet invoked “rehabilitation setting tensions.” A continuum was engaged in the theme “navigating a middle ground,” representing an integrated environment approach; rehabilitation in conventional indoor and outdoor community settings. Development of a sustainable concept for outdoor community-based rehabilitation involves strengthening health professionals’ competencies and skills for providing outdoor and community work.
BarnsleyL.McCluskeyA.MiddletonS. (2012). What people say about travelling outdoors after their stroke: A qualitative study. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 59(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00935.x
2.
BowlerD. E.Buyung-AliL. M.KnightT. M.PullinA. S. (2010). A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health, 10(1), 456–456. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-456
3.
BrettJ.StaniszewskaS.MockfordC.Herron-MarxS.HughesJ.TysallC.SulemanR. (2014). A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities. The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 7(4), 387–395.
4.
BurnsN.WatsonN.PatersonK. (2013). Risky bodies in risky spaces: Disabled people’s pursuit of outdoor leisure. Disability & Society, 28(8), 1059–1073.
5.
CatalaniC.MinklerM. (2010). Photovoice: A review of the literature in health and public health. Health Education & Behavior, 37(3), 424–451.
6.
CreightonG.OliffeJ. L.FerlatteO.BottorffJ.BroomA.JenkinsE. K. (2018). Photovoice ethics: Critical reflections from men’s mental health research. Qualitative Health Research, 28, 446–455.
7.
DassahE.AlderseyH. M.NormanK. E. (2017). Photovoice and persons with physical disabilities: A scoping review of the literature. Qualitative Health Research, 27(9), 1412–1422. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316687731
8.
DorschT. E.RichardsK. A.SwainJ.MaxeyM. (2016). The effect of an outdoor recreation program on individuals with disabilities and their family members. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 50(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.18666/TRJ-2016-V50-I2-6527
9.
GairS. (2012). Feeling their stories: Contemplating empathy, insider/outsider positionings, and enriching qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 22(1), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732311420580
10.
GiddensA. (1997). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Polity Press.
11.
HammersleyM.AtkinsonP. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. Routledge.
12.
HandbergC.MygindO.Sau JohansenJ. (2018). Lessons learnt on the meaning of involvement and co-creation in developing community-based rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 41(25), 3052–3060. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1490461
Hernandez-SacaD. I.CannonM. A. (2016). Disability as psycho-emotional disablism: A theoretical and philosophical review of education theory and practice. In PetersM. A. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory (pp. 1–7). Springer.
15.
JakubecS. L.Carruthers Den HoedD.RayH.KrishnamurthyA. (2016). Mental well-being and quality-of-life benefits of inclusion in nature for adults with disabilities and their caregivers. Landscape Research, 41(6), 616–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1197190
16.
JohansenJ.RahbekJ.MøllerK. (2004). Rehabilitering i Danmark—hvidbog om rehabiliteringsbegrebet [The white paper—rehabilitation in Denmark]. Marselisborg centret, rehabiliteringsforum Danmark og marselisborg centret.
17.
KendallE.MuenchbergerH.CatalanoT. (2009). The move towards community-based rehabilitation in industrialised countries: Are we equipped for the challenge?Disability and Rehabilitation, 31, 2164–2173.
18.
KondoM. C.JacobyS. F.SouthE. C. (2018). Does spending time outdoors reduce stress? A review of real-time stress response to outdoor environments. Health & Place, 51, 136–150.
19.
KruegerR. A.CaseyM. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage.
20.
LightfootE. (2004). Community-based rehabilitation: A rapidly growing method for supporting people with disabilities. International Social Work, 47(4), 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872804046253
21.
MaasJ.SpreeuwenbergP.GroenewegenP. P. (2008). Physical activity as a possible mechanism behind the relationship between green space and health: A multilevel analysis. BMC Public Health, 8, Article 206.
22.
MaasJ.Van DillenS. M. E.VerheijR. A.GroenewegenP. P. (2009). Social contacts as a possible mechanism behind the relation between green space and health. Health & Place, 15(2), 586–595.
23.
MadsenL. S.HandbergC.JensenC. M.NielsenC. V. (2020). Community-based rehabilitation approaches in outdoor settings: A systematic review of people with disabilities’ and professionals’ experiences and perceptions. Disability & Society, 1–26.
24.
McCluskeyA.MiddletonS. (2010). Delivering an evidence-based outdoor journey intervention to people with stroke: Barriers and enablers experienced by community rehabilitation teams. BMC Health Services Research, 10, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-18
25.
MoellerC.KingN.BurrV.GibbsG. R.GomersallT. (2018). Nature-based interventions in institutional and organisational settings: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 28(3), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2018.1468425
26.
MurrayL.NashM. (2017). The challenges of participant photography: A critical reflection on methodology and ethics in two cultural contexts. Qualitative Health Research, 27(6), 923–937.
27.
NunnerleyJ. L.Hay-SmithE.DeanS. G. (2013). Leaving a spinal unit and returning to the wider community: An interpretative phenomenological analysis; 23035858. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35(14), 1164–1173. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.723789
28.
O’BrienL.VarleyP. (2012). Use of ethnographic approaches to the study of health experiences in relation to natural landscapes. Perspectives in Public Health, 132(6), 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757913911434895
29.
O’ByrneP. (2007). The advantages and disadvantages of mixing methods: An analysis of combining traditional and autoethnographic approaches. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1381–1391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307308304
30.
OliffeJ. L.BottorffJ. L. (2007). Further than the eye can see? Photo elicitation and research with men. Qualitative Health Research, 17(6), 850–858.
31.
PrettyJ.PeacockJ.SellensM.GriffinM. (2005). The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 15(5), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603120500155963
32.
RavnM. B.PetersenK. S.ThuesenJ. (2019). Rehabilitation for people living with dementia: A scoping review of processes and outcomes. Journal of Aging Research, 2019, 4141050. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4141050
33.
RitchieJ.ZwiA. B.BlignaultI.Bunde-BirousteA.SiloveD. (2009). Insider-outsider positions in health-development research: Reflections for practice. Development in Practice, 19(1), 106–112.
34.
SahlinE.AhlborgJ. G.TenenbaumA.GrahnP. (2015). Using nature-based rehabilitation to restart a stalled process of rehabilitation in individuals with stress-related mental illness. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(2), 1928–1951. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120201928
35.
SahlinE.MatuszczykJ. V.AhlborgJ. G.GrahnP. (2012). How do participants in nature-based therapy experience and evaluate their rehabilitation?Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 22(1), 8–23.
36.
ThorneS. E. (2016). Interpretive description: Qualitative research for applied practice (2nd ed.). Routledge.
37.
WadeD. T. (2020). What is rehabilitation? An empirical investigation leading to an evidence-based description. Clinical Rehabilitation, 34(5), 571–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215520905112
38.
WolskoC.HoytK. (2012). Employing the restorative capacity of nature: Pathways to practicing ecotherapy among mental health professionals. Ecopsychology, 4(1), 10–24.
World Health Organization. (2011). World report on disability.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
