In this article, we apply narrative dialogism and new materialism to health research. We examine how material↔semiotic environments (MSEs) affect the rehabilitation process of Patrick, a man who exercised with the aim to recover from spinal cord injury. The MSEs are considered embedded subcases within the overall holistic case of Patrick. Three MSEs were identified: the hospital gym, the personal gym, and the adapted gym. These are examined using the analytical lens of assemblages. First, the mutually affecting components of each MSE are described. Second, a larger environmental assemblage is identified, which is termed exercise-is-restitution assemblage. This composite assemblage illuminates the associations between the three MSEs, and reveals how restitution resonated across time and space. The article contributes to the literature by reconceptualizing restitution. It highlights the importance of the materiality of health-related narratives, and it reveals the potential of MSE for transforming rehabilitation and improving exercise promotion and maintenance.
AagaardJ.MatthiesenN. (2016). Methods of materiality: Participant observation and qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 13, 33–46. doi:10.1080/14780887.2015.1090510
2.
AtkinsonR. (1998). The life story interview. London: Sage.
3.
BakhtinM. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
4.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5.
BennettJ. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
6.
CaddickN.SmithB.PhoenixC. (2015). The effects of surfing and the natural environment on the well-being of combat veterans. Qualitative Health Research, 25, 76–86. doi:10.1177/1049732314549477
7.
CarlessD.PeacockS.McKennaJ.CookeC. (2013). Psychosocial outcomes of an inclusive adapted sport and adventurous training course for military personnel. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35, 2081–2088. doi:10.3109/09638288.2013.802376
8.
CarminatiL. (2018). Generalizability in qualitative research: A tale of two traditions. Qualitative Health Research, 28, 2094–2101. doi:10.1177/1049732318788379
9.
ChamberlainK.LyonsA. (2016). Using material objects and artifacts in research. In SmithB.SparkesA. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise (pp. 164–176). London: Routledge.
10.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus. London: Continuum.
11.
DolphijnR.van der TuinI. (2012). New materialism: Interviews & cartographies. Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities Press.
12.
FeelyM. (2016). Disability studies after the ontological turn: A return to the material world and material bodies without a return to essentialism. Disability & Society, 31, 863–883. doi:10.1080/09687599.2016.1208603
13.
FoxN. J.AlldredP. (2016). Sociology, environment and health: A materialist approach. Public Health, 141, 287–293. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2016.09.015
14.
FoxN. J.AlldredP. (2018a). The materiality of memory: Affects, remembering and food decisions. Cultural Sociology, 13(1), 20–36. doi:10.1177/1749975518764864
15.
FoxN. J.AlldredP. (2018b). New materialism. In AtkinsonP. A.DelamontS.HardyM. A.WilliamsM. (Eds.), The SAGE encyclopedia of research methodsLondon: Sage.
16.
FrankA. W. (2005). What is dialogical research, and why should we do it?Qualitative Health Research, 15, 964–974. doi:10.1177/1049732305279078
17.
FrankA. W. (2010). Letting stories breathe. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
18.
FrankA. W. (2012). Practicing dialogical narrative analysis. In HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. F. (Eds.), Varieties of narrative analysis (pp. 33–52). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
FrankA. W. (2013). The wounded storyteller: Body, illness, and ethics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
20.
FrostN.NolasS. (2011). Exploring and expanding on pluralism in qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 8, 115–119. 10.1080/14780887.2011.572728
21.
FullagarS. (2017). Post-qualitative inquiry and the new materialist turn: Implications for sport, health and physical culture research. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 9, 247–257. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2016.1273896
22.
GibsonB. E.KingG.TeachmanG.MistryB.HamdaniY. (2017). Assembling activity/setting participation with disabled young people. Sociology of Health & Illness, 39, 497–512. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12496
GleggS. M. (2018). Facilitating interviews in qualitative research with visual tools: A typology. Qualitative Health Research, 29, 301–310. doi:10.1177/1049732318786485
25.
GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (2008). Narrative ethnography. In Hesse-BiberS. N.LeavyP. (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 241–264). New York: Guilford Press.
26.
GzilF.LefeveC.CammelliM.PachoudB.RavaudJ. F.LeplegeA. (2007). Why is rehabilitation not yet fully person-centred and should it be more person-centred?Disability and Rehabilitation, 29, 1616–1624. doi:10.1080/09638280701618620
27.
HammellK. W. (2007). Quality of life after spinal cord injury: A meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Spinal Cord, 45, 124–139. doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101992
28.
HultmanK.Lenz TaguchiH. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23, 525–542. doi:10.1080/09518398.2010.500628
29.
IovinoS.OppermannS. (2012). Theorizing material ecocriticism: A diptych. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 19, 448–475. doi:10.1093/isle/iss087
KubyC. R. (2017). Why a paradigm shift of “more than human ontologies” is needed: Putting to work poststructural and posthuman theories in writers’ studio. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30, 877–896. doi:10.1080/09518398.2017.1336803
32.
KummB. E.BerbaryL. A. (2018). Questions for post-qualitative inquiry: Conversations to come. Leisure Sciences, 40(1–2), 71–84. doi:10.1080/01490400.2017.1376014
33.
LatourB. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
34.
LawJ.MolA. (2008). The actor-enacted: Cumbrian sheep in 2001. In KnappettC.MalafourisL. (Eds.), Material agency: Towards a non-anthropocentric approach (pp. 57–77). Boston: Springer.
35.
Lenz TaguchiH.St. PierreE. A. (2017). Using concept as method in educational and social science inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23, 643–648. doi:10.1177/1077800417732634
36.
Martin GinisK. A.JörgensenS.StapletonJ. (2012). Exercise and sport for persons with spinal cord injury. PM&R, 4, 894–900. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.08.006
37.
MazzeiL. A. (2013). A voice without organs: Interviewing in posthumanist research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 732–740. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.788761
38.
MazzeiL. A.JacksonA. Y. (2018). Voice in the agentic assemblage. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 29, 1090–1098. doi:10.1080/00131857.2016.1159176
39.
MealerM.JonesJ. (2014). Methodological and ethical issues related to qualitative telephone interviews on sensitive topics. Nurse Researcher, 21(4), 32–37. doi:10.7748/nr2014.03.21.4.32.e1229
40.
MonforteJ. (2018). What is new in new materialism for a newcomer?Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 10, 378–390. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2018.1428678
41.
MonforteJ.Pérez-SamaniegoV.Devís-DevísJ. (2018). The Anabasis of Patrick: Travelling an allegorical narrative map of illness and disability. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 37, 235–243. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.10.005
42.
MorseJ. M. (2007). Ethics in action: Ethical principles for doing qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 1003–1005. doi:10.1177/1049732307308197
43.
PapathomasA.WilliamsT. L.SmithB. (2015). Understanding physical activity participation in spinal cord injured populations: Three narrative types for consideration. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 10, Article 27295. doi:10.3402/qhw.v10.27295
44.
Pérez-SamaniegoV.López-CañadaE.MonforteJ. (2017). Physical activity and disability: A qualitative study on women at an adapted gym. Movimento, 23, 855–868.
45.
PerrierM. J.SmithB.Latimer-CheungA. E. (2013). Narrative environments and the capacity of disability narratives to motivate leisure-time physical activity among individuals with spinal cord injury. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35, 2089–2096. doi:10.3109/09638288.2013.821179
46.
PhoenixC.SmithB. (2011). Telling a (good?) counterstory of aging: Natural bodybuilding meets the narrative of decline. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 66, 628–639. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbr077
47.
RabinowP.RoseN. (2003). The essential foucault. New York: The New Press.
48.
RichardsonE. V.SmithB.PapathomasA. (2017). Disability and the gym: Experiences, barriers and facilitators of gym use for individuals with physical disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39, 1950–1957. doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1213893
SmithB. (2013). Disability, sport and men’s narratives of health: A qualitative study. Health Psychology, 32, 110–119. doi:10.1037/a0029187
51.
SmithB. (2018). Generalizability in qualitative research: Misunderstandings, opportunities and recommendations for the sport and exercise sciences. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 10, 137–149. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2017.1393221
52.
SmithB.Allen-CollinsonJ.PhoenixC.BrownD.SparkesA. (2009). Dialogue, monologue, and boundary crossing within research encounters: A performative narrative analysis. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 7, 342–358. doi:10.1080/1612197X.2009.9671914
53.
SmithB.KirbyN.SkinnerB.WightmanL.LucasR.FosterC. (2018). Physical activity for general health benefits in disabled adults: Summary of a rapid evidence review for the UK Chief Medical Officers’ update of the physical activity guidelines. London: Public Health England.
54.
SmithB.SparkesA. C. (2005). Men, sport, spinal cord injury, and narratives of hope. Social Science & Medicine, 61, 1095–1105. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.01.011
55.
SmithB.SparkesA. C. (2008). Narrative and its potential contribution to disability studies. Disability & Society, 23, 17–28. doi:10.1080/09687590701725542
56.
SparkesA. C. (1998). Athletic identity: An Achilles’ heel to the survival of self. Qualitative Health Research, 8, 644–664. doi:10.1177/104973239800800506
57.
SparkesA. C.BrightonJ.InckleK. (2018). “It’s a part of me”: An ethnographic exploration of becoming a disabled sporting cyborg following spinal cord injury. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 10, 151–166. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2017.1389768
58.
SrnicekN. (2007). Assemblage theory, complexity and contentious politics (Doctoral thesis). London, Canada: University of Western Ontario.
59.
StacchiottiS.SommerJ.Chordoma Global Consensus Group. (2015). Building a global consensus approach to chordoma: A position paper from the medical and patient community. The Lancet Oncology, 16, e71–e83. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71190-8
60.
WilliamsT. L.SmithB.PapathomasA. (2014). The barriers, benefits and facilitators of leisure time physical activity among people with spinal cord injury: A meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Health Psychology Review, 8, 404–425. doi:10.1080/17437199.2014.898406
61.
YinR. K. (2012). Applications of case study research (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62.
ZembylasM. (2017). The contribution of non-representational theories in education: Some affective, ethical and political implications. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36, 393–407. doi:10.1007/s11217-016-9535-2
