The involvement of “people with experience” in research has developed considerably in the last decade. However, involvement as co-analysts at the point of data analysis and synthesis has received very little attention—in particular, there is very little work that involves people living with dementia as co-analysts. In this qualitative secondary data analysis project, we (a) analyzed data through two theoretical lenses: Douglas’s cultural theory of risk and Tronto’s Ethic of Care, and (b) analyzed data in workshops with people living with dementia. The design involved cycles of presenting, interpreting, representing and reinterpreting the data, and findings between multiple stakeholders. We explore ways of involving people with experience as co-analysts and explore the role of reflexivity, multiple voicing, literary styling, and performance in participatory data analysis.
AbmaT. A.NierseC.WiddershovenG. A. M. (2009). Patients as partners in responsive research: Methodological notions for collaborations in mixed research teams. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 401–415. doi:10.1177/1049732309331869
2.
AlaszewskiA.HarrisonL.ManthorpeJ. (1998). Risk, health, and welfare: Policies, strategies, and practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
3.
AlthausC. E. (2005). A disciplinary perspective on the epistemological status of risk. Risk Analysis, 25, 567–588. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00625.x
4.
Alzheimer’s Disease International. (2012). World Alzheimer report 2012: Overcoming the stigma of dementia. London: Author.
5.
BaileyC.ClarkeC. L.GibbC.HainingS.WilkinsonH.TipladyS. (2013). Risky and resilient life with dementia: Review of and reflections on the literature. Health Risk & Society, 15, 390–401. doi:10.1080/13698575.2013.821460
6.
BarnesM. (2012). Care in everyday life: An ethic of care in practice. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
7.
BarnesM.BrannellyT. (2008). Achieving care and social justice for people with dementia. Nursing Ethics, 15, 384–395. doi:10.1177/0969733007088363
8.
BergoldJ.ThomasS. (2012). Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion. Qualitative Social Research, 13(1), Article 30.
9.
BoyleG. (2013). “She’s usually quicker than the calculator”: Financial management and decision-making in couples living with dementia. Health & Social Care in the Community, 21, 554–562. doi:10.1111/hsc.12044
10.
BrannellyT. (2011). Sustaining citizenship: People with dementia and the phenomenon of social death. Nursing Ethics, 18, 662–671. doi:10.1177/0969733011408049
11.
ClarkeC. L.KeyesS. E.WilkinsonH.AlexjukJ.WilcocksonJ.RobinsonL.. . . CattanM. (2013). Healthbridge: The national evaluation of peer support networks and dementia advisers in implementation of the national dementia strategy for England (Ref: 025/058). Department of Health Policy Research Programme Project. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/peer-support-networks-and-dementia-advisers-evaluation
12.
ClarkeC. L.KeyesS. E.WilkinsonH.AlexjukJ.WilcocksonJ.RobinsonL.. . . CattanM. (2014). Organisational space for partnership and sustainability: Lessons from the implementation of the national dementia strategy for England. Health & Social Care in the Community, 22, 634–645. doi:10.1111/hsc.12134
13.
ClarkeC. L.KeyesS. E.WilkinsonH.AlexjukJ.WilcocksonJ.RobinsonL.. . . CattanM. (2016). “I just want to get on with my life”—A mixed methods study of active management of quality of life in living with dementia. Ageing & Society, 38, 378–402. doi:10.1017/S0144686X16001069
14.
ClarkeC. L.WilkinsonH.KeadyJ.GibbC. E. (2011). Risk assessment and management for living well with dementia. London: Jessica Kingsley.
15.
CortiL.BishopL. (2005). Strategies in teaching secondary analysis of qualitative data. Qualitative Social Research, 6, 1–23. doi:10.17169/fqs-6.1.509
16.
CottrellP. (2008). Exploring the value of service user involvement in data analysis: “Our interpretation is about what lies below the surface.”Educational Action Research, 16, 5–17. doi:10.1080/09650790701833063
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2003). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
19.
Department of Health. (2009). Living well with dementia: A national dementia strategy. London: Author.
20.
DouglasM. (1992). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. London: Routledge.
21.
DouglasM.WildavskyA. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
DupuisS. L.KontosP.MitchellG.Jonas-SimpsonC.GrayJ. (2016). Re-claiming citizenship through the arts. Dementia, 15, 358–380. doi:10.1177/1471301216637206
23.
EvansA. J. (2007). Towards a corporate cultural theory. ESCP-EAP European School of Management. Fairfax: George Manson University.
24.
FrankhamJ. (2009). Partnership research: A review of approaches and challenges in conducting research in partnership with service users (NCRM/013). Swindon, UK: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods.
25.
GillardS.SimonsL.TurnerK.LucockM.EdwardsC. (2012). Patient and public involvement in the coproduction of knowledge: Reflection on the analysis of qualitative data in a mental health study. Qualitative Health Research, 22, 1126–1137. doi:10.1177/1049732312448541
26.
GoveD.Diaz-PonceA.GeorgesJ.Moniz-CookE.MountainG.ChattatR., . . . The European Working Group of People with Dementia. (2018). Alzheimer Europe’s position on involving people with dementia in research through PPI (Patient and Public Involvement). Aging and Mental Health, 22, 723–729. doi:10.1080/13607863.2017.1317334
27.
GustafsonD. L.BrungerF. (2014). Ethics, “vulnerability,” and feminist participatory action research with a disability community. Qualitative Health Research, 24, 997–1005. doi:10.1177/1049732314538122
28.
HammersleyM. (2010). Can we re-use qualitative data via secondary analysis? Notes on some terminological and substantive issues. Sociological Research Online, 15, 1–7. doi:10.5153/sro.2076
29.
HughesJ. C. (2011). Thinking through dementia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
JohannessenA.MöllerA. (2013). Experiences of persons with early-onset dementia in everyday life: A qualitative study. Dementia, 12, 410–424. doi:10.1177/1471301211430647
31.
KelderJ.-A. (2005). Using someone else’s data: Problems, pragmatics and provisions. Qualitative Social Research, 6(1), Article 39. doi:10.17169/fqs-6.1.501
32.
KeyesS. E.ClarkeC. L.WilkinsonH.AlexjukJ.WilcocksonJ.RobinsonL.. . . CattanM. (2016). “We’re all thrown in the same boat . . . ”: A qualitative analysis of peer support in dementia care. Dementia, 15, 560–577. doi:10.1177/1471301214529575
33.
LiamputtongP. (2009). Qualitative data analysis: Conceptual and practical considerations. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 20, 133–139. doi:10.1071/HE09133
34.
Long-SutehallT.SqueM.Addington-HallJ. (2011). Secondary analysis of qualitative data: A valuable method for exploring sensitive issues with an elusive population?Journal of Research in Nursing, 16, 335–344. doi:10.1177/1744987110381553
35.
McKillopJ.WilkinsonH. (2004). Make it easy on yourself! Advice to researchers from someone with dementia on being interviewed. Dementia, 3, 117–125. doi:10.1177/1471301204042332
36.
NierseC. J.SchipperK.van ZadelhoffE.van de GriendtJ.AbmaT. A. (2012). Collaboration and co-ownership in research: Dynamics and dialogues between patient research partners and professional researchers in a research team. Health Expectations, 15, 242–254. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00661.x
37.
ReadS.Maslin-ProtheroS. (2011). The involvement of users and carers in health and social research: The realities of inclusion and engagement. Qualitative Health Research, 21, 704–713. doi:10.1177/1049732310391273
38.
ReasonP.BradburyH. (Eds.). (2008). The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.
39.
SalmonA. (2007). Walking the talk: How participatory interview methods can democratize research. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 982–993. doi:10.1177/1049732307305250
40.
Scottish Dementia Working Group Research Sub-Group. (2014). Core principles for involving people with dementia in research: Innovative practice. Dementia, 13, 680–685. doi:10.1177/1471301214533255
41.
SevenhuijsenS. (2003). The place of care the relevance of the ethics of care for social policy. In SevenhuijsenS.SvabA. (Eds.), Labyrinth of care: The relevance of the ethics of care perspective for social policy (pp. 13–43). Ljubljana, Slovenia: Mirovni Institut.
42.
SheehanB. (2012). Assessment scales in dementia. Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders, 5, 349–358. doi:10.1177/1756285612455733
43.
Sims-SchoutenW.RileyS. C. E.WilligC. (2007). Critical realism in discourse analysis: A presentation of a systematic method of analysis using women’s talk of motherhood, childcare and female employment as an example. Theory & Psychology, 17, 101–124. doi:10.1177/0959354307073153
44.
StevensonM.TaylorB. J. (2017). Involving individuals with dementia as co-researchers in analysis of findings from a qualitative study. Dementia. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1471301217690904
45.
SwarbrickC.Open Doors, Scottish Dementia Working GroupEducateDavisK.KeadyJ. (2016). Visioning change: Co-producing a model of involvement and engagement in research (innovative practice). Dementia. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1471301216674559
46.
TannerD. (2012). Co-research with older people with dementia: Experience and reflections. Journal of Mental Health, 21, 296–306. doi:10.3109/09638237.2011.651658
47.
TanseyJ.O’riordanT. (1999). Cultural theory and risk: A review. Health Risk & Society, 1, 71–90. doi:10.1080/13698579908407008
48.
TrontoJ. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. London: Routledge.
49.
Tuffrey-WijneI.ButlerG. (2010). Co-researching with people with learning disabilities: An experience of involvement in qualitative data analysis. Health Expectations, 13, 174–184. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00576.x
50.
van den BergH. (2005). Reanalyzing qualitative interviews from different angles: The risk of decontextualization and other problems of sharing qualitative data. Qualitative Social Research, 6(1), Article 30.
51.
WilkinsonH. (Ed.). (2002). The perspectives of people with dementia: Research methods and motivations. London: Jessica Kingsley.
52.
YardleyS. J.WattsK. M.PearsonJ.RichardsonJ. C. (2014). Ethical issues in the reuse of qualitative data: Perspectives from literature, practice, and participants. Qualitative Health Research, 24, 102–113. doi:10.1177/1049732313518373
