A variety of materials offering healthy eating advice have been produced in the United Kingdom to encourage people to eat well and avoid diet-related health issues. By applying a Foucauldian discourse analysis, this research aimed to uncover the discourses used in six healthy eating texts (two state-produced and four commercial texts), how people positioned themselves in relation to these discourses, and the power relations between institutions and the U.K. public. Ten discourses including scientific, thermodynamics, natural, family/caring, emotional, medical, and moral discourses were uncovered and offered up subject positions in relation to moral citizenship and personal responsibility. Through the use of biopower, foods appeared to be categorized as “good” or “bad” foods in which bad foods were considered to be risky to health due to their nutritional composition. Most texts assumed people have the agency to follow the advice provided and failed to consider the readers’ personal contexts.
BrownellK. D. (2015). The power of industry (money) in influencing science. In SternbergR. J.FiskeS. T. (Eds.), Ethical challenges in the behavioral and brain sciences (pp. 197–199). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139626491.075
CamposP.SaguyA.ErnsbergerP.OliverE.GaesserG. (2006). The epidemiology of overweight and obesity: Public health crisis or moral panic?International Journal of Epidemiology, 35(1), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyi254
5.
CheekJ. (2004). At the margins? Discourse analysis and qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 14(8), 1140–1150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304266820
ChrislerJ. C. (1994). Reframing women’s weight: Does thin equal healthy? In DanA. (Ed.), Reframing women’s health: Multidisciplinary research and practice (pp. 330–338). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483327099.n27
8.
ChrysochouP. (2010). Food health branding: The role of marketing mix elements and public discourse in conveying a healthy brand image. Journal of Marketing Communications, 16(1–2), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527260903342787
CoveneyJ. (1998). The government and ethics of health promotion: The importance of Michel Foucault. Health Education Research, 13(3), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/13.3.459
CrawfordR. (2006). Health as a meaningful social practice. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 10(4), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459306067310
13.
CrossleyM. L. (2002). The perils of health promotion and the “barebacking” backlash. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 6(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/136345930200600101
14.
CrottyP. (1995). Good nutrition? Fact and fashion in dietary advice. Allen & Unwin.
DoddsA.ChamberlainK. (2017). The problematic messages of nutritional discourse: A case-based critical media analysis. Appetite, 108, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.09.021
17.
DowlerE. (2014). Food banks and food justice in “Austerity Britain.” In RichesG.SilvastiT. (Eds.), First world hunger revisited: Food charity or the right to food? (pp. 160–175). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137298737_12
18.
DuffJ. (2004). Setting the menu: Dietary guidelines, corporate interests and nutrition policy. In GermovD. J.WilliamsL. (Eds.), Sociology of food and nutrition: The social appetite (2nd ed., pp. 148–169). Oxford University Press.
19.
FoucaultM. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. Tavistock.
20.
FoucaultM. (1978). The history of sexuality: Vol. 1. An introduction. Pantheon Books.
21.
FoucaultM. (1988). Technologies of the self. In MartinL.GutmanH.HuttonP. H. (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). Tavistock.
22.
GastaldoD. (1997). Is health education good for you? Re-thinking health education through the concept of bio-power. In BuntonR.PetersenA. (Eds.), Foucault, health and medicine (pp. 113–133). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203005347
23.
GenuisS. K. (2013). Social positioning theory as a lens for exploring health information seeking and decision making. Qualitative Health Research, 23(4), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312470029
24.
HarrisJ. E.GleasonP. M.SheeanP. M.BousheyC.BetoJ. A.BruemmerB. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research for food and nutrition professionals. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 109(1), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.018
LawrenceM.GermovJ. (2004). Future food: The politics of functional foods and health claims. In GermovD. J.WilliamsL. (Eds.), Sociology of food and nutrition: The social appetite (2nd ed., pp. 119–147). Oxford University Press.
LuptonD. (1997). Foucault and the medicalisation critique. In BuntonR.PetersenA. (Eds.), Foucault, health and medicine (pp. 94–112). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203005347
MaddenH.ChamberlainK. (2004). Nutritional health messages in women’s magazines: A conflicted space for women readers. Journal of Health Psychology, 9(4), 583–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105304044044
33.
MallinsonL. J.RussellJ. M.BarkerM. E. (2016). Attitudes and behaviour towards convenience food and food waste in the United Kingdom. Appetite, 103, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.03.017
34.
McVeeM. B.SilvestriK. N.BarrettN.HaqK. S. (2018). Positioning theory. In AlvermannD. E.UnrauN. J.SailorsM.RuddellR. B. (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of literacy (7th ed., pp. 381–400). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315110592-23
MontaniJ.-P.SchutzY.DullooA. G. (2015). Dieting and weight cycling as risk factors for cardiometabolic diseases: Who is really at risk?: Weight cycling and cardiometabolic risks. Obesity Reviews, 16, 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12251
37.
MorrisM. A.HulmeC.ClarkeG. P.EdwardsK. L.CadeJ. E. (2014). What is the cost of a healthy diet? Using diet data from the UK Women’s Cohort Study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 68(11), 1043–1049. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2014-204039
38.
NestleM. (2013). Food politics: How the food industry influences nutrition and health (Rev., expanded 10th anniversary ed.). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520955066
39.
NewtonA.Lloyd-WilliamsF.BromleyH.CapewellS. (2016). Food for thought? Potential conflicts of interest in academic experts advising government and charities on dietary policies. BMC Public Health, 16(1), Article 735. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3393-2
40.
NobleG.SteadM.JonesS.McDermottL.McVieD. (2007). The paradoxical food buying behaviour of parents: Insights from the UK and Australia. British Food Journal, 109(5), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1108/0070700710746795
41.
O’ByrneP. (2012). Population health and social governance: Analyzing the mainstream incorporation of ethnography. Qualitative Health Research, 22(6), 859–867. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732311425049
42.
OgdenJ. (2010). The psychology of eating: From healthy to disordered behavior (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
43.
ParkerI. (1992). Discourse dynamics: Critical analysis for social and individual psychology. Routledge.
PedersenS. (2016). The good, the bad and the ‘good enough’ mother on the UK parenting forum Mumsnet. Women’s Studies International Forum, 59, 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2016.09.004
46.
PerezC. C. (2019). Invisible women: Exposing data bias in a world designed for men. Chatto & Windus.
47.
PurdamK.GarrattE. A.EsmailA. (2016). Hungry? Food insecurity, social stigma and embarrassment in the UK. Sociology, 50(6), 1072–1088. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038515594092
SainiA. (2018). Inferior: How science got women wrong—And the new research that’s rewriting the story. Fourth Estate.
50.
ScarboroughP.BhatnagarP.WickramasingheK. K.AllenderS.FosterC.RaynerM. (2011). The economic burden of ill health due to diet, physical inactivity, smoking, alcohol and obesity in the UK: An update to 2006-07 NHS costs. Journal of Public Health, 33(4), 527–535. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdr033
51.
SchiratoT.DanaherG.WebbJ. (2012). Understanding Foucault: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). SAGE.
52.
SchneiderT.DavisT. (2010). Fostering a hunger for health: Food and the self in “The Australian Women’s Weekly.”Health Sociology Review, 19(3), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.2010.19.3.285
53.
Smith MaguireJ. (2016). Introduction: Looking at food practices and taste across the class divide. Food, Culture & Society, 19(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2016.1144995
54.
Stainton RogersW. (2012). Changing behaviour: Can critical psychology influence policy and practice? In HorrocksC.JohnsonS. (Eds.), Advances in health psychology: Critical approaches (pp. 44–58). Palgrave Macmillan.
55.
WhitelawS. (2012). The emergence of a “dose–response” analogy in the health improvement domain of public health: A critical review. Critical Public Health, 22(4), 427–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2012.682147
56.
WilligC. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology (3rd ed.). Open University Press.
57.
WillsW. J.DickinsonA. M.ShortF.ComrieF. (2013). What is being conveyed to health professionals and consumers through web and print sources of nutrition information?Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 5(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs.5.2.221_1
ZwierS. (2009). Medicalisation of food advertising. Nutrition and health claims in magazine food advertisements 1990–2008. Appetite, 53(1), 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2009.05.017
