Limited clinical research with pregnant women has resulted in insufficient data to promote evidence-informed prenatal care. Charmaz’s constructivist grounded theory methodology was used to explore how research with pregnant women would be determined ethically acceptable from the perspectives of pregnant women, health care providers, and researchers in reproductive sciences. Semistructured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 12 pregnant women, 10 health care providers, and nine reproductive science researchers. All three groups suggested the importance of informed consent and that permissible risk would be very limited and complex, being dependent on the personal benefits and risks of each particular study. Pregnant women, clinicians, and researchers shared concerns about the well-being of the woman and her fetus, and expressed a dilemma between promoting research for evidence-informed prenatal care while securing the safety in the course of research participation.
AdamM. P.PolifkaJ. E.FriedmanJ. M. (2011). Evolving knowledge of the teratogenicity of medications in human pregnancy. American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 157, 175–182. doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.30313
2.
AlleseeL.GallagherC. M. (2011). Pregnancy and protection: The ethics of limiting a pregnant woman’s participation in clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Research & Bioethics, 2, Article 108. doi:10.4172/2155-9627.1000108
3.
AndradeS. E.SmithD. H.YoodM. U.MorseA. N.PlattR.GurwitzJ. H.. . . RoblinD. (2004). Prescription drug use in pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 191, 398–407. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.04.025
4.
AppelbaumP. S.BergJ. W.LidzC. W. (2001). Informed consent: Legal theory and clinical practice. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
5.
AppelbaumP. S.LidzC. W. (2008). Twenty-five years of therapeutic misconception. Hastings Center Report, 38(2), 5–7.
6.
AyadM.CostantineM. M. (2015). Epidemiology of medications use in pregnancy. Seminars in Perinatology, 39, 508–511. doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2015.08.002
7.
BakerL.LavenderT.TincelloD. (2005). Factors that influence women’s decisions about whether to participate in research: An exploratory study. Birth, 32, 60–66. doi:10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00346.x
8.
BallantyneA.PullonS.MacdonaldL.BarthowC.WickensK.CraneJ. (2017). The experiences of pregnant women in an interventional clinical trial: Research in Pregnancy Ethics (RIPE) study. Bioethics, 31, 476–483. doi:10.1111/bioe.12361
9.
BarkerD. J. P. (2000). In utero programming of cardiovascular disease. Theriogenology, 53, 555–574. doi:10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00258-7
10.
BarkerK. K. (1998). A ship upon a stormy sea: The medicalization of pregnancy. Social Science & Medicine, 47, 1067–1076. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00155-5
11.
BaylisF. (2010). Pregnant women deserve better. Nature, 465, 689–690. doi:10.1038/465689a
12.
BaylisF.KaposkyC. (2010). Wanted: Inclusive guidelines for research involving pregnant women. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 32, 473–476.
13.
BirksM.MillsJ. (2011). Grounded theory: A practical guide. Los Angeles: Sage.
14.
BondasT.ErikssonK. (2001). Women’s lived experiences of pregnancy: A tapestry of joy and suffering. Qualitative Health Research, 11, 824–840.
15.
BrandonA. R.ShivakumarG.LeeS. C.InrigS. J.SadlerJ. Z. (2009). Ethical issues in perinatal mental health research. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 22, 601–606. doi:10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283318e6f
16.
Canadian Institute of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, & Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (2014). Tri-council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans (2nd ed.). Ottawa, Ontario: Secretariat on Responsible Conduct of Research. Retrieved from http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2-2014/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdf
17.
CapronA. M. (2008). Legal and regulatory standards of informed consent in research. In EmanuelE. J.LieR. K.GradyC.MillerF. G.CrouchR. A.WendlerD. (Eds.), The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics (pp. 613–622). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18.
ChantlerT. E. A.LeesA.MoxonE. R.MantD.PollardA. J.FiztpatrickR. (2007). The role familiarity with science and medicine plays in parents’ decision making about enrolling a child in vaccine research. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 311–322. doi:10.1177/1049732306298561
19.
CharmazK. (2003). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 249–297). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
CharoR. A. (1993). Protecting us to death: Women, pregnancy, and clinical research trials. Saint Louis University Law Journal, 38, 135–187.
DomínguezV.RamosN.TorrentsA.GarcíaD.CarnéX. (2012). Clinical trials during pregnancy: What has been done. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 68, 455–458. doi:10.1007/s00228-011-1145-x
26.
DorantesD. M.TaitA. R.NaughtonN. N. (2000). Informed consent for obstetric anesthesia research: Factors that influence parturients’ decisions to participate. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 91, 369–373. doi:10.1213/00000539-200008000-00025
27.
EastC. E.ChanF. Y.BrenneckeS. P.KingJ. F.ColditzP. B. (2006). Women’s evaluations of their experience in a multicenter randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry (The FOREMOST Trial). Birth, 33, 101–109. doi:10.1111/j.0730-7659.2006.00086.x
28.
EastC. E.ColditzP. B. (1996). Women’s evaluations of their experience with fetal intrapartum oxygen saturation monitoring and participation in a research project. Midwifery, 12(2), 93–97.
29.
EmanuelE. J.WendlerD.GradyC. (2008). An ethical framework for biomedical research. In EmanuelE. J.GradyC.CrouchR. A.LieR. K.MilleF. G.WendlerD. (Eds.), The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics (pp. 123–135). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
30.
EngelandA.BramnessJ. G.DaltveitA. K.RønningM.SkurtveitS.FuruK. (2008). Prescription drug use among fathers and mothers before and during pregnancy. A population-based cohort study of 106,000 pregnancies in Norway 2004-2006. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 65, 653–660. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03102.x
31.
FalagasM. E.KorbilaI. P.GiannopoulouK. P.KondilisB. K.PeppasG. (2009). Informed consent: How much and what do patients understand?American Journal of Surgery, 198, 420–435. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.02.010
32.
FloryJ.EmanuelE. (2004). Interventions to improve research participants’ understanding in informed consent for research: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 292, 1593–1601. doi:10.1001/jama.292.13.1593
33.
FoundsS. A. (2007). Participating in research for pregnancy complicated by breech. Health Care for Women International, 28, 573–589.
34.
GatnyH. H.AxinnW. G. (2012). Willingness to participate in research during pregnancy: Race, experience, and motivation. Field Methods, 24, 135–154.
35.
GodfreyK. M.BarkerD. J. P. (2000). Fetal nutrition and adult disease. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 71(5), 1344S–1352S.
36.
HalkoahoA.PietiläA. M.DumezB.Van DammeK.HeinonenS.VähäkangasK. (2010). Ethical aspects of human placental perfusion: Interview of the mothers donating placenta. Placenta, 31, 686–690.
37.
HalkoahoA.VähäkangasK.Häggman-LaitilaA.PietiläA. M. (2012). Views of midwives about ethical aspects of participation in placental perfusion studies. Midwifery, 28, 131–137.
38.
HelmreichR. J.HundleyV.NormanA.IghedosaJ.ChowE. (2007). Research in pregnant women: The challenges of informed consent. Nursing for Women’s Health, 11, 576–585.
39.
HendrixM.Van HorckM.MoretaD.NiemanF.NieuwenhuijzeM.SeverensJ.NijhuisJ. (2009). Why women do not accept randomisation for place of birth: Feasibility of a RCT in The Netherlands. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 116, 537–544.
40.
HollowayI.TodresL. (2003). The status of method: Flexibility, consistency and coherence. Qualitative Research, 3, 345–357. doi:10.1177/1468794103033004
41.
HuttonJ. D.WilkinsonA. M.NealeJ. (1990). Poor participation of nulliparous women in a low dose aspirin study to prevent preeclampsia. New Zealand Medical Journal, 103, 511–512.
42.
IrvineL.FlynnR. W. V.LibbyG.CrombieI. K.EvansJ. M. (2010). Drugs dispensed in primary care during pregnancy. Drug Safety, 33, 593–604. doi:10.2165/11532330-000000000-00000
43.
JosephJ. W.NeidichA. B.OberC.RossL. F. (2008). Empirical data about women’s attitudes toward a biobank focused on pregnancy outcomes. American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A, 146, 305–311. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.32146
44.
KassN. E.TaylorH. A.KingP. A. (1996). Harms of excluding pregnant women from clinical research: The case of HIV-infected pregnant women. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 24, 36–46. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.1996.tb01831.x
45.
KenyonS.Dixon-WoodsM.JacksonC. J.WindridgeK.PitchforthE. (2006). Participating in a trial in a critical situation: A qualitative study in pregnancy. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 15, 98–101. doi:10.1136/qshc.2005.015636
46.
KopelmanL. M. (2000). Children as research subjects: A dilemma. Journal of Medicine & Philosophy, 25, 745–764.
47.
KrubinerC. B.FadenR. R.CadiganR. J.GilbertS. Z.HenryL. M.LittleM. O.. . . LyerlyA. D. (2016). Advancing HIV research with pregnant women: Navigating challenges and opportunities. AIDS, 30, 2261–2265. doi:10.1097/QAD.0000000000001214
48.
KuczewskiM. G.MarshallP. (2002). The decision dynamics of clinical research: The context and process of informed consent. Medical Care, 40(9), V45–V54. doi:10.1097/01.MLR.0000023955.04138.AF
49.
LacroixI.Damase-MichelC.Lapeyre-MestreM.MontastrucJ. L. (2000). Prescription of drugs during pregnancy in France. The Lancet, 356, 1735–1736. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03209-8
50.
LancasterP. A. L. (2011). Causes of birth defects: Lessons from history. Congenital Anomalies, 51, 2–5. doi:10.1111/j.1741-4520.2010.00311.x
51.
Langley-EvansS. C.McMullenS. (2010). Developmental origins of adult disease. Medical Principles and Practice, 19(2), 87–98. doi:10.1159/000273066
52.
LawtonJ.SnowdonC.MorrowS.NormanJ. E.DenisonF. C.HallowellN. (2016). Recruiting and consenting into a peripartum trial in an emergency setting: A qualitative study of the experiences and views of women and healthcare professionals. Trials, 17(1), Article 195. doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1323-3
53.
LevineR. J. (1988). Ethics and regulation of clinical research. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
54.
LuptonD. (1999a). Risk (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.
55.
LuptonD. (1999b). Risk and ontology of pregnant embodiment. In LuptonD. (Ed.), Risk and sociocultural theory: New directions and perspectives (pp. 59–85). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
56.
LuptonD. (2012). “Precious cargo”: Foetal subjects, risk and reproductive citizenship. Critical Public Health, 22, 329–340. doi:10.1080/09581596.2012.657612
57.
LyerlyA. D.LittleM. O.FadenR. R. (2008). The second wave: Toward responsible inclusion of pregnant women in research. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 1(2), 5–22. doi:10.2979/FAB.2008.1.2.5
58.
LyerlyA. D.MitchellL. M.ArmstrongE. M.HarrisL. H.KuklaR.KuppermannM.LittleM. O. (2009a). Risk and the pregnant body. Asian Bioethics Review, 1, 367–382.
59.
LyerlyA. D.MitchellL. M.ArmstrongE. M.HarrisL. H.KuklaR.KuppermannM.LittleM. O. (2009b). RISK and the pregnant body. Hastings Center Report, 39(6), 34–42.
60.
LyerlyA. D.NameyE. E.GrayB.SwamyG.FadenR. R. (2012). Women’s views about participating in research while pregnant. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 34(4), 1–8.
MacklinR. (2010). Enrolling pregnant women in biomedical research. The Lancet, 375, 632–633. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60257-7
63.
MastroianniA. C.FadenR.FedermanD. (1994). Women and health research: A report from the institute of medicine. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 4(1), 55–62. doi:10.1353/ken.0.0121
64.
MattisonD.ZajicekA. (2006). Gaps in knowledge in treating pregnant women. Gender Medicine, 3, 169–182. doi:10.1016/S1550-8579(06)80205-6
65.
McCulloughL. B.CoverdaleJ. H.ChervenakF. A. (2005). A comprehensive ethical framework for responsibly designing and conducting pharmacologic research that involves pregnant women. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 193, 901–907. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.020
66.
MillerT. (2005). Making sense of motherhood: A narrative approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
67.
MinkoffH.MorenoJ. D.PowderlyK. R. (1992). Fetal protection and women’s access to clinical trials. Journal of Women’s Health, 1, 137–140.
68.
MitchellA. A.GilboaS. M.WerlerM. M.KelleyK. E.LouikC.Hernández-DíazS. (2011). Medication use during pregnancy, with particular focus on prescription drugs: 1976-2008. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 205(1), 51.e1–51.e8. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.02.029
69.
MohannaK.TunnaK. (1999). Withholding consent to participate in clinical trials: Decisions of pregnant women. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 106, 892–897.
70.
MoserM.BrownC. M.RoseC. H.GarovicV. D. (2012). Hypertension in pregnancy: Is it time for a new approach to treatment?Journal of Hypertension, 30, 1092–1100.
71.
MuddL. M.PhamX.NechutaS.ElliottM. R.LepkowskiJ. M.PanethN., & Michigan Alliance for the National Children’s Study. (2008). Prenatal care and delivery room staff attitudes toward research and the National Children’s Study. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 12, 684–691.
72.
National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council & Australian Vice-Chancellor’s Committee. (2014). National statement on ethical conduct in human research. Retrieved from https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/e72
73.
NguiE. M.WarnerT. D.RobertsL. W. (2014). Perceptions of African-American health professionals and community members on the participation of children and pregnant women in genetic research. Public Health Genomics, 17(1), 23–32.
74.
PennZ. J.SteerP. J. (1990). Reasons for declining participation in a prospective randomized trial to determine the optimum mode of delivery of the preterm breech. Controlled Clinical Trials, 11, 226–231. doi:10.1016/0197-2456(90)90038-4
75.
PrescottS. L.CliftonV. (2009). Asthma and pregnancy: Emerging evidence of epigenetic interactions in utero. Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 9, 417–426. doi:10.1097/ACI.0b013e328330634f
76.
RodgerM. A.MakropoulosD.WalkerM.KeelyE.KarovitchA.WellsP. S. (2003). Participation of pregnant women in clinical trials: Will they participate and why?American Journal of Perinatology, 20(2), 69–76. doi:10.1055/s-2003-38318
77.
RubinR. (1984). Maternal identity and the maternal experience. New York: Springer.
78.
SandelowskiM.BarrosoJ. (2003). Writing the proposal for a qualitative research methodology project. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 781–820. doi:10.1177/1049732303255474
79.
ShieldsK. E. (2012). The participation of pregnant women in clinical research: Implications for practice within the U.S. pharmaceutical industry (ProQuest dissertations and theses). University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
80.
ShieldsK. E.LyerlyA. D. (2013). Exclusion of pregnant women from industry-sponsored clinical trials. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 122, 1077–1081.
81.
SmolinaK.HanleyG. E.MintzesB.OberlanderT. F.MorganS. (2015). Trends and determinants of prescription drug use during pregnancy and postpartum in British Columbia, 2002-2011: A population-based cohort study. PLoS ONE, 10(5), e0128312. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128312
82.
SmythR.JacobyA.ElbourneD. (2012). Deciding to join a perinatal randomised controlled trial: Experiences and views of pregnant women enroled in the Magpie Trial. Midwifery, 28(4), E478–E545. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2011.08.006
83.
SternP. N. (1980). Grounded theory methodology: Its uses and processes. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 12, 20–23. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.1980.tb01455.x
84.
StrongC. (2011). How should risks and benefits be balanced in research involving pregnant women and fetuses?IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 33(6), 1–5.
85.
SuttonE. F.CainL. E.ValloP. M.RedmanL. M. (2017). Strategies for successful recruitment of pregnant patients into clinical trials. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 129, 554–559. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001900
86.
WadaK. (2016). Informed decision making during pregnancy: Risk consideration in clinical practice and research. Western University. Retrieved from http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/3636
87.
WileyK. E.CooperS. C.WoodN.LeaskJ. (2015). Understanding pregnant women’s attitudes and behavior toward influenza and pertussis vaccination. Qualitative Health Research, 25, 360–370. doi:10.1177/1049732314551061
World Medical Association. (2013). World medical association Declaration of Helsinki principles for medical research involving human subjects. Journal of American Medical Association, 310(20), 2191–2194. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281053
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
