Ever since the rise of online support groups it has been presumed that there is an empowering effect from patients' participating in these groups, despite a lack of evidence to back up this assumption. In this study we explored if, and in which ways, patients feel empowered by participation. Additionally, we studied which empowering and disempowering processes occur as a result of taking part in these groups. To accomplish this aim, we interviewed 32 participants of online support groups. This analysis revealed the following empowering processes: exchanging information, encountering emotional support, finding recognition, sharing experiences, helping others, and amusement. Disempowering processes were mentioned far less often. Empowering outcomes mentioned were being better informed; feeling confident in the relationship with their physician, their treatment, and their social environment; improved acceptance of the disease; increased optimism and control; enhanced self-esteem and social well-being; and collective action. This article demonstrates that participation in online support groups can make a valuable contribution to the emergence of empowered patients.
Aujoulat, I., d'Hoore, W., & Deccache, A. (2007). Patient empowerment in theory and practice: Polysemy or cacophony?Patient Education and Counseling, 66(1): 13-20.
2.
Bane, C.M.H., Haymaker, C.M.B., & Zinchuk, J. (2005). Social support as a moderator of the big-fish-in-a-little-pond effect in online self-help support groups. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 10(4): 239-261.
3.
Broom, A. (2005). Virtually healthy: The impact of Internet use on disease experience and the doctor-patient relationship. Qualitative Health Research, 15(3): 325-345.
4.
Cummings, J.N., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S.B. (2002). Beyond hearing: Where real-world and online support meet. Group Dynamics, 6: 78-88.
5.
Demiris, G. (2006). The diffusion of virtual communities in health care: Concepts and challenges. Patient Education and Counseling , 62(2): 178-188.
6.
Eysenbach, G. (2003). The impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes . CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 53(6): 356-371.
7.
Eysenbach, G., Powell, J., Englesakis, M., Rizo, C., & Stern, A. (2004). Health-related virtual communities and electronic support groups: Systematic review of the effects of online peer-to-peer interactions . British Medical Journal, 328: 1166-1170.
8.
Faulkner, M. (2001). A measure of patient empowerment in hospital environments catering for older people. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34(5): 676-686.
9.
Ferguson, T. (1992). Patient, heal thyself: Health in the information age. The Futurist, 26(1): 9-14.
10.
Feste, C., & Anderson, R.M. (1995). Empowerment: From philosophy to practice. Patient Education and Counseling, 26: 139-144.
11.
Finfgeld, D.L. (2000). Therapeutic groups online: The good, the bad, and the unknown. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 21(3): 241-255.
12.
Finn, J. (1999). An exploration of helping processes in an online self-help group focusing on issues of disability. Health and Social Work, 24(3): 220-231.
13.
Funnell, M.M., & Anderson, R.M. (2003). Patient empowerment: A look back, a look ahead. Diabetes Education, 29: 454-462.
14.
Gibson, C.H. (1991). A concept analysis of empowerment. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 16(3): 354—361.
15.
Gutschoven, K., & Bulck, van den J. (2006). Towards the measurement of psychological health empowerment in the general public. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Dresden International Congress Centre, Dresden, Germany, June 16, 2006.
16.
Helgeson, V.S., & Gottlieb, B.H. (2000). Support groups. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A handbook for health and social scientists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
Helgeson, V.S., & Taylor, S.E. (1993). Social comparisons and adjustment among cardiac patients. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23: 1171-1195.
18.
Hibbard, J.H., Stockard, J., Mahoney, E.R., & Tusler, M. (2004). Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): Conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers . Health Services Research, 39(4, Part 1): 1005-1026.
19.
Hill, W., Weiner, C. & Cudney, S. (2006). Influence of a computer intervention on the psychological status of chronically ill rural women: Preliminary results. Nursing Research, 55(1): 34-42.
20.
Hoch, D., & Ferguson, T. (2005). What I've learned from e-patients. PLoS Medicine2(8):e206.
21.
Høybye, M.T., Johansen, C., Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, T. (2005). Online interaction: Effects of storytelling in an Internet breast cancer support group. Psycho-Oncology, 14(3): 211-220.
22.
Klemm, P., Bunnell, D., Cullen, M., Soneji, R., Gibbons, P., & Holecek, A. (2003). Online cancer support groups. A review of the research literature. Computers in Nursing, 21(3): 136-142.
23.
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmarck, M., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9): 1017-1031.
24.
Leiberich, P., Nedoschill, J., Nickel, M., Loew, T., & Tritt, K. (2004). Selbsthilfe und Beratung im Internet: Mündige Benutzer können die Arzt-Patienten-Beziehung neu gestalten [Self-help and consultation via the Internet: Self-responsible users redefine the physician-patient relationship]. Medizinische Klinik, 99(5): 263-268.
25.
Masi, C.M., Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Cassey, M.Z., Kinney, L., & Piotrowski, H. (2003). Internet access and empowerment: A community-based health initiative. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18: 525—530.
26.
Menon, S.T. (2002). Toward a model of psychological health empowerment: Implications for health care in multicultural communities. Nurse Education Today, 22(1): 28-39.
27.
Mitcheson, J., & Cowley, S. (2003). Empowerment or control? An analysis of the extent to which client participation is enabled during health visitor/client interactions using a structured health needs assessment tool. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 40(4): 413—426.
28.
Morahan-Martin, J., & Schumacher, P. (2003). Loneliness and social uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(6): 659-671.
29.
O'Cathain, A., Goode, J., Luff, D., Strangleman, T., Hanlon, G., & Greatbatch, D. (2005). Does NHS Direct empower patients? Social Science & Medicine, 61(8): 1761-1771.
30.
Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
Perron, B. (2002). Online support for caregivers of people with a mental illness. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 26(1): 70-77.
32.
Powell, J., McCarthy, N., & Eysenbach, G. (2003). Cross-sectional survey of users of Internet depression communities. BMC Psychiatry, 10(3):19.
33.
Preece, J. (1999). Empathic communities: Balancing emotional and factual communication. Interacting with Computers, 12(1): 63-77.
34.
Preece, J., Nonnecke, B., & Andrews, D. (2004). The top five reasons for lurking: Improving community experiences for everyone. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(2): 201-223.
35.
Radin, P. (2006). “To me, it's my life”: Medical communication, trust, and activism in cyberspace. Social Science & Medicine , 62(3): 591-601.
36.
Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15(2): 121-148.
37.
Reeves, P.M. (2001). How individuals coping with HIV/AIDS use the Internet . Health Education Research, 16: 709-19.
38.
Riessman, F. (1997). Ten self-help principles. Social Policy, 27(3):6-11.
39.
Rimer, B.K., Lyons, E.J., Ribisl, K.M., Bowling, J.M., Golin, C.E., Forlenza, M.J., & Meier, A. (2005). How new subscribers use cancer-related online mailing lists. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 7(3):e32.
40.
Roberts, K.J. (1999). Patient empowerment in the United States: A critical commentary. Health Expectations, 2(2), 82-92.
41.
Salem, D.A., Bogat, G.A., & Reid, C. (1997). Mutual help goes on-line. Journal of Community Psychology, 25(2): 189-207.
42.
Salmon, P., & Hall, G.M. (2003). Patient empowerment and control: A psychological discourse in the service of medicine. Social Science & Medicine, 57(10), 1969-1980.
43.
Schulz, A.J., Israel, B.A., Zimmerman, M.A., & Checkoway, B.N. (1995). Empowerment as a multi-level construct: Perceived control at the individual, organisational and community levels. Health Education Research, 10(3): 309—327.
44.
Sharf, B.F. (1997). Communicating breast cancer on-line: Support and empowerment on the Internet. Women & Health, 26(1): 65-84.
45.
Shaw, B., McTavish, F., Hawkins, R.P., Gustafson, D., & Pingree, S. (2000). Experiences of women with breast cancer: Exchanging social support over the CHESS computer network. Journal of Health Communication, 5(2): 135-149.
46.
Smith, J.A. (1995). Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis . In J. A. Smith, R. Harre, & L. V. Langenhove (Eds), Rethinking Methods in Psychology. London: Sage.
47.
Van Uden-Kraan, C.F., Drossaert, C.H.C., Taal, E., Lebrun, C., Drossaers-Bakker, W., Smit, W., Seydel, E., & van de Laar, M. (2007). Coping with somatic illnesses in online support groups: Do the feared disadvantages actually occur?Computers in Human Behavior. Epub ahead of print: doi:10.1016/j.chb .2007.01.014.
48.
Walstrom, M.K. (2000). “You know, who's the thinnest?”: Combating surveillance and creating safety in coping with eating disorders online. CyberPsychology and Behaviour, 3(5): 761-83.
49.
Winkelman, W.J., & Choo, C.W. (2003). Provider-sponsored virtual communities for chronic patients: Improving health outcomes through organizational patient-centred knowledge management. Health Expectations, 6(4): 352-358.
50.
Winzelberg, A. (1997). The analysis of an electronic support group for individuals with eating disorders. Computers in Human Services , 13(3): 393-407.
