Nursing leaders are attempting to provide effective support for staff as well as optimal client care in the most challenging of times for the health care industry globally. Regardless of where leaders practice, their health care setting will have its own socially constructed way of getting the work done. In this article the authors suggest Carspecken's critical methodology, particularly his use of the pragmatic horizon, as a useful method to assist leaders in recognizing their own behaviors as a first step to providing leadership that is more emancipatory. The aim of this reflection and resulting action is increasing leadership effectiveness to improve health care outcomes.
Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (2000). Doing critical management research. London: Sage.
2.
Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology. London : Sage.
3.
Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (1992). On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies. Academy of Management Review, 17(3), 432-464.
4.
Carspecken, P.F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research. New York: Routledge.
5.
Carspecken, P.F., & Cordeiro, P.A. (1995). Being, doing, and becoming: Textual interpretations of social identity and a case study. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(1), 87-109.
6.
Cook, K.E. (2005). Using critical ethnography to explore issues in health promotion. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 129-138.
7.
Davies, G. (2005). Queensland public hospitals commission of inquiry report. Retrieved January 26, 2007, from http://www.qphci.qld.gov.au/FinalReport.htm
8.
Fay, B. ( 1987). Critical social science. New York : Cornell University Press.
9.
Fontana, J.S. (2004). A methodology for critical science in nursing. Advances in NursingScience, 27(2), 93-101.
10.
Foster, W. (1986). The reconstruction of leadership. Melbourne, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
11.
Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
12.
Georgiou, D., & Carspecken, P.F. (2002). Critical ethnography and ecological psychology: Conceptual and empirical explorations of a synthesis . Qualitative Inquiry, 8(6), 688-706.
13.
Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or praxis? London: Falmer.
14.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Boston: Beacon.
15.
Hardcastle, M., Usher, K., & Holmes, C. (2006). Carspecken's five-stage critical qualitative research method: An application to nursing research. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 151-161.
16.
Kincheloe, K.D., & McLaren, P. (2003). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research . In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 433-488). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McGrath, K. (2005). Doing critical research in information systems: A case of theory and practice not informing each other. Information Systems Journal, 15, 85-101.
19.
Smyth, W., & Holmes, C. (2005). Using Carspecken's critical ethnography in nursing research. Contemporary Nurse, 19(1), 65-74.
20.
Stewart, L., Usher, K., Nadakuitavuki, R., & Tollefson, J. (2006). Developing the future nurse leaders of Fiji. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23(4), 47-51.
21.
Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour. Hants, UK: Saxon House. Lee Stewart
