In this article, the authors analyze participants’ accounts of why they took part in a repeat-interview study exploring newly diagnosed patients’ perceptions of diabetes service provision in Lothian, Scotland. The study involved three semistructured in-depth interviews with each patient (N = 40), which spanned a year. The authors provide a thematic discursive analysis of responses to the question, Can I ask you what made you decide to part in the study and why you’ve stayed involved over the past year? The main themes are (a) recruitment within health contexts (“the nurse said it would help”), (b) altruism (“if it can help somebody”), (c) qualitative research being seen as inherently innocuous (“nothing to lose”), and (d) therapeutic aspects of interviewing (“getting it off my chest”). The analysis contributes both to the qualitative literature about generic research participation and to a germinal literature exploring qualitative health research participation.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
3.
Dyregrov, K. (2004). Bereaved parents’ experience of research participation. Social Science and Medicine, 58, 391-400.
4.
Edwards, S. J. L., Lilford, R. J., & Hewison, J. (1998). The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public, and healthcare professionals. British Medical Journal, 317, 1209-1212.
5.
Ellis, P. M. (2000). Attitudes towards and participation in randomised clinical trials in oncology: A review of the literature. Annals of Oncology, 11, 939-945.
6.
Featherstone, K., & Donovan, J. L. (1998). Random allocation or allocation at random?: Patients’ perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 317, 1177-1180.
7.
Finch, J. (1984). It’s great to have someone to talk to: The ethics and politics of interviewing women. In C. Bell & H. Roberts (Eds.), Social researching (pp. 70-87). London: RKP.
8.
Grinyer, A. (2004). The narrative correspondence method: What a follow-up study can tell us about the longer term effect on participants in emotionally demanding research. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 1326-1341.
9.
Holstein, J., & Gubrium, J. (1995). The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Holstein, J., & Gubrium, J. (1997). Active interviewing. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research (pp. 113-129). London: Sage.
11.
Huizinga, G. A., Sleijfer, D. T., van de Wiel, H. B. M., & van der Graaf, W. T. A. (1999). Decision-making process in patients before entering phase III cancer clinical trials: A pilot study. Cancer Nursing, 22(2), 119-125.
12.
Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Lawton, J., Fox, A., Fox, C., & Kinmonth, A. L. (2003). Participating in the United Kingdom prospective diabetes study (UKDPS): A qualitative study of patients’ experiences. British Journal of General Practice, 53, 394-398.
14.
Lawton, J., Parry, O., Peel, E., & Douglas, M. (2005). Diabetes service provision: A qualitative study of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients’ preferences and views. Diabetic Medicine, 22, 1246-1251.
15.
Lawton, J., Peel, E., Parry, O., Araoz, G., & Douglas, M. (2005). Lay perceptions of type 2 diabetes in Scotland: Bringing health services back in. Social Science & Medicine, 60(7), 1423-1435.
16.
Lawton, J., Peel, E., Douglas, M., & Parry, O. (2004). “Urine testing is a waste of time”: Qualitative study of patients’ experiences and views about glucose self-monitoring technologies. Diabetic Medicine, 21, 1045-1048.
17.
Mathieson, C. M. (1999). Interviewing the ill and the healthy. In M. Murray & K. Chamberlain (Eds.), Qualitative health psychology: Theories and methods. (pp. 117-133). London: Sage.
18.
Mattson, M. E., Curb, J. D., McArdle, R., & the AMIS and BHAT Research Groups. (1985). Participation in a clinical trial: The patients’ point of view. Controlled Clinical Trials, 6, 156-167.
19.
McAllister, M. (2005). On the joys and sorrows of recruiting hospital patients. In N. Hallowell, J. Lawton, & S. Gregory (Eds.), Reflections on research: The realities of doing research in the social sciences. (pp. 67-69). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
20.
Nightingale, D. J., & Cromby, J. (1999). Social constructionist psychology: A critical analysis of theory and practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
21.
Parry, O., Peel, E., Douglas, M., & Lawton, J. (2004). Patients in waiting: A qualitative study of type 2 diabetes patients’ perceptions of diagnosis. Family Practice, 21(2), 131-136.
22.
Parry, O., Peel, E., Douglas, M., & Lawton, J. (2006). Issues of cause and control in patients’ accounts of type 2 diabetes. Health Education Research, 21(1), 97-107.
23.
Peel, E., Parry, O., Douglas M., & Lawton J. (2004a). Blood glucose self-monitoring in non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes: Qualitative study of patients’ perspectives. British Journal of General Practice, 54, 183-188.
24.
Peel, E., Parry, O., Douglas, M., & Lawton, J. (2004b). Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes: A qualitative analysis of patients’ emotional reactions and views about information provision. Patient Education & Counseling, 53, 269-275.
25.
Peel, E., Parry, O., Douglas, M., & Lawton, J. (2005). Taking the biscuit?: A discursive approach to managing diet in type 2 diabetes. Journal of Health Psychology, 10(6), 779-791.
26.
Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.
27.
Ribbens, J. (1989). Interviewing—An “unnatural situation”?Women’s Studies International Forum, 12(6), 579-592.
28.
Richards, H., & Emslie, C. (2000). The “doctor” or the “girl from the University”? Considering the influence of professional roles on qualitative interviewing. Family Practice, 17(1), 71-75.
29.
Sanchez, S., Salazar, G., Tijero, M., & Diaz, S. (2001). Informed consent procedures: Responsibilities of researchers in developing countries. Bioethics, 15(5/6), 398-412.
30.
Shamai, M. (2003). Therapeutic effects of qualitative research: Reconstructing the experience of treatment as a by-product of qualitative evaluation. Social Service Review, 77(3), 455-467.
31.
Strauss, R. P., Sengupta, S., Kegeles, S., McLellan, E., Metzger, D., Eyre, S., et al. (2001). Willingness to volunteer in future preventive HIV vaccine trials: Issues and perspectives from three US communities. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 26(1), 63-71.
32.
Tully, J., Ninis, N., Booy, R., & Viner, R. (2000). The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: Prospective study. BMJ, 320, 1179-1182.
33.
Warburton, J., & Dyer, M. (2004). Older volunteers participating in a university research registry: Helping others my age. Educational Gerontology, 30(5), 367-381.
34.
Wilcox, M., & Schroer, S. (1994). The perspective of patients with vascular disease on participation in clinical trials. Journal of Vascular Nursing, 12(4), 112-116.
35.
Willig, C. (2004). Discourse analysis and health psychology. In M. Murray (Ed.), Critical health psychology (pp. 155-169). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
