Practice guidelines are the latest attempt to bring science to bear on social work practice. They are a worthy effort, but like earlier efforts, may achieve limited success. It is unlikely these documents will be read by social workers, and the guidelines themselves may not be readily usable. Moreover, the social work knowledge base is thin and practice decisions are governed by many nonscientific considerations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association. (1995). Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with substance use disorders: Alcohol, cocaine, opioids. Supplement to the American Journal of Psychiatry, 152(11), 1-59.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (1997a). Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias of late life. Supplement to the American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(5), 1-39.
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (1997b). Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Supplement to the American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(4), 1-63.
4.
Bloom, M., Fischer, J., & Orme, J. G. (1995). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable professional (2nd ed.). Needham, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
5.
Fischer, J. (1976). Effectiveness of social casework. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
6.
Grasso, T., & Epstein, I. (Eds.). (1992). Research utilization in the social services. New York: Haworth.
7.
Howard, M. O., & Jenson, J. M. (1999). Clinical practice guidelines: Should social work adopt them?Research on Social Work Practice, 9(3), 283-301.
8.
Kirk, S. A., & Kutchins, H. (1992). The selling of DSM: The rhetoric of science in psychiatry. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
9.
Kutchins, H., & Kirk, S. A. (1997). Making us crazy: DSM—the psychiatry bible and the creation of mental disorder. New York: Free Press.
10.
Mullen, E., & Dumpson, J. (Eds.). (1972). Evaluation of social intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Rossi, P., & Freeman, H. (1993). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
Rothman, J., & Thomas, E. (Eds.). (1994). Intervention research: Design and development for human services. New York: Haworth.
13.
Rubin, A., & Rosenblatt, A. (Eds.). (1979). Sourcebook on research utilization. New York: Council on Social Work Education.
14.
Task Force on Social Work Research. (1991). Building social work knowledge for effective services and policies: A plan for research development. (Available from David Austin, School of Social Work, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712-1703)
15.
Wakefield, J., & Kirk, S. A. (1996). Unscientific thinking about scientific practice: Evaluating the scientist-practitioner model. Social Work Research, 20, 83-95.
