Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In an effort to curb the reported increases in violent juvenile crime, the growing trend of state legislatures is the removal of crimes specified as serious from the jurisdiction of the juvenile court. Having been legislatively waived, these offenses are placed within the jurisdiction of the superior court, and the offender, regardless of age, is tried as an adult. This investigation reports on the deterrent effect of the Georgia legislative waiver passed in 1994. A quasi-experimental cohort design is used in a comparison of the mean arrest rates for juveniles arrested for the specified crimes before and after the law's enactment. The analysis of the data suggests that there were no significant reductions in the mean arrest rates for the offenses specified by the law. Findings are consistent with studies that evaluated the legislative waiver in other states and suggest that the law does not reduce serious juvenile crime.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bernard, T. (1992). The cycle of juvenile justice New York: Oxford University Press.

Bortner, M. (1986). Traditional rhetoric, organizational realities: Remand of juveniles to adult court Crime & Delinquency , 32, 53-57.

Champion, D. (1989). Teenage felons and waiver hearings: Some recent trends, 1980-1988 Crime & Delinquency, 35, 577-585.

Champion, D. , & Mays, G. (1991). Transferring juveniles to criminal courts: Trends and implications for criminal justice New York: Praeger.

Cook, T. & Campbell, D. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Donegan, C. (1996). Preventing juvenile crime CQ Researcher , 6, 217-240.

Fagan, J. , Forst, M. , & Vivona, T. (1987). Racial determinants of the judicial transfer decision: Prosecuting violent youth in criminal court Crime & Delinquency , 33, 259-286.

Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1993). Crime in the United States 1993: The uniform crime report Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice .

Feld, B. (1987). Juvenile court meets the principle of offense: Legislative changes in juvenile waiver statutes Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 78, 471-533.

10.

Feld, B. (1993). Juvenile (in)justice and the criminal court alternative Crime & Delinquency, 39, 403-424.

11.

Georgia Bureau of Investigation. (1997). Georgia Crime Information Center. Uniform Crime Reporting Program , Decatur: State of Georgia.

12.

Georgia Indigent Defense Council. (1997). Juveniles charged as adults under SB440 Unpublished manuscript.

13.

Georgia Juvenile Justice Reform Act, SB 440, Act 1125, Official Code of Georgia Annotated, §§ 11-15-5 (1994).

14.

Gillespie, K. , & Norman, M. (1984). Does certification mean prison? Some preliminary findings from Utah Juvenile & Family Court Journal , 35, 23-34.

15.

Guarino-Ghezzi, S. , & Loughran, E. (1996). Balancing juvenile justice New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

16.

Hamparian, D. , Estep, L. , Muntean, S. , Priestino, R. , Swisher, R. , Wallace, P. , & White, J. (1982). Youth in adult courts: Between two worlds Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

17.

Henggler, S. (1989). Delinquency in adolescents Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

18.

Houghtalin, M. , & Mays, L. (1991). Criminal dispositions of New Mexico juveniles transferred to adult court Crime & Delinquency , 37, 393-407.

19.

Jensen, E. , & Metsger, L. (1994). A test of the deterrent effect of legislative waiver on violent juvenile crime Crime & Delinquency , 40, 96-104.

20.

Krisberg, B. , & Austin, J. (1993). Reinventing juvenile justice Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

21.

Kurtz, D. , Giddings, M. , & Sutphen, R. (1993). A prospective investigation of racial disparity in the juvenile justice system Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 44, 43-59.

22.

Platt, A. (1977). The child savers: The invention of delinquency Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

23.

Pope, C. , & Feyerherm, W. (1990). Minority status and juvenile justice processing Criminal Justice Abstracts, 22, 327-335.

24.

Singer, S. , & McDowall, D. (1988). Criminalizing delinquency: The deterrent effects of the New York juvenile offender law Law & Society Review , 22, 521-535.

25.

Snyder, H. , Sickmund, M. , & Poe-Yamagata, E. (1996). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1996 update on violence Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention .

Evaluating the Georgia Legislative Waiver's Effectiveness in Deterring Juvenile Crime

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References