Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Over the past 10 years, there has been an increasing emphasis on having social workers develop culturally sensitive interventions. However, relatively little attention has been given to evaluating the effectiveness of these new approaches. Concurrently, there has been a significant promotion of single-system design methodology as a practical means of evaluation that can readily be utilized by direct practitioners. Therefore, the application of single-system design to the evaluation of culturally sensitive practice is a logical methodological approach. This article describes how single-system design methodology can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of culturally sensitive social work interventions. Methodological issues that arise in utilizing this particular technique with culturally diverse clients will be discussed, along with strategies to address these methodological issues.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beaver

M. L.

(1990). The older person in the black family. in Logan

S. M. L.

Freeman

E. M.

McRoy

R. G.

(eds.), Social work practice with black families: A culturally specific perspective (pp. 223–238). New York: Longman.

Becerra

R. M.

Zambrana

R. E.

(1985). Methodological approaches to research on Hispanics. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 21, 42–49.

Bloom

Fischer

Orme

J. G.

(1995). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable professional (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Blythe

B. J.

Briar

(1985). Developing empirically based models of practice. Social Work, 30, 483–488.

Briar

(1973). The age of accountability. Social Work, 18, 2.

Campbell

D. T.

Stanley

J. C.

(1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Cervantes

R. C.

Padilla

A. M.

Salgado de Snyder

(1991). The Hispanic stress inventory: A culturally relevant approach to psychosocial assessment. Psychological Assessment, 3, 438–447.

Chan

D. W.

(1991). The Beck Depression Inventory: What difference does the Chinese version make? Psychological Assessment, 4, 616–622.

Cheung

F. K.

Snowden

L. R.

(1990). Community mental health and ethnic minority populations. Community Mental Health Journal, 26, 277–289.

10.

Devore

Schlesinger

E. G.

(1981). Ethnic sensitive social work practice. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby.

11.

Gutkin

A. J.

Holborn

S. W.

Walker

Y. R.

Anderson

B. A.

(1992). Treatment integrity of relaxation training for tension headaches. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 23, 191–198.

12.

Hughes

Seidman

Williams

(1993). Cultural phenomena and the research enterprise: Toward a culturally anchored methodology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 687–703.

13.

Jayaratne

Levy

R. L.

(1979). Empirical clinical practice. New York: Columbia University Press.

14.

Johnston

Pennypacker

(1980). Strategies and tactics of human behavioral research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

15.

Moncher

Prinz

(1991). Treatment fidelity in outcome studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 247–266.

16.

Reid

W. J.

(1993). Fitting the single-system design to family treatment. Journal of Social Service Research, 18, 83–99.

17.

Rodgers

A. Y.

Hodges

V. G.

Blythe

B. J.

(1992). Reaching high-risk African American children and families with a community-based approach. Unpublished manuscript.

18.

Saleebey

(ed.). (1992). The strengths perspective in social work practice. New York: Longman.

19.

Sohng

S. S.

(1994). Are traditional research methods inherently biased against people of color? Yes. in Hudson

W. W.

Nurius

P. S.

(eds.), Controversial issues in social work research (pp. 22–27). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

20.

Sue

D. W.

Sue

(1990). Counseling the culturally different (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.

21.

Videka-Sherman

Reid

W. J.

(1985). The structured clinical record: A clinical education tool. The Clinical Supervisor, 3, 45–62.

Evaluating Culturally Sensitive Practice Through Single-System Design: Methodological Issues and Strategies

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References