This article was originally presented in 1995 as the keynote address of the National Conference
of the Australian Association of Social Workers. The author analyzes some of the sources of
resistance to accepting scientific methodology within social work, including political, philosophical, and quasi-religious ones. The strength of scientific methods, as opposed to other ways
of knowing, includes their utility in proving that some "findings" are indeed false and their
skeptical attitude toward new claims.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Atherton, C.R. (1993). Empiricists versus social constructionists: Time for a cease-fireFamilies in Society, 74, 617-624.
2.
Barber, J.G., Punt, J., & Albers, J. (1988). Alcohol and power on Palm IslandAustralian Journal of Social Issues, 23, 87-101.
3.
Buchler, J. (Ed.). (1955). Philosophical writings of Charles Pierce.New York: Dover.
4.
Bushman, B.J., & Cooper, H.M. (1990). Effects of alcohol on human aggression: An integrative research reviewPsychological Bulletin , 107, 341-354.
5.
Chalmers, A.F. (1979). What is this thing called science ?St. Lucia, Australia: University of Queensland Press.
6.
Cohen, M., & Nagel, E. (1934). An introduction to logic and scientific method.New York: Harcourt.
7.
Davis, L.V. (1986). A feminist approach to social work researchAffilia, 1, 32-47.
8.
Durkheim, E. (1976). The elementary forms of religious life (2nd ed.). London: Allen & Unwin. (Original work published 1912)
9.
Epstein, W.M. (1986). Science and social workSocial Service Review, 60, 144-160.
10.
Farrell, S. (1985). Review of national policy methods to prevent alcohol-related problems.Geneva: World Health Organization.
11.
Gross, P.R., & Levitt, N. (1994). Higher superstition: The academic left and its quarrels with science.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
12.
Heineman, M.B. (1981). The obsolete scientific imperative in social work researchSocial Service Review, 55, 371-379.
13.
Imre, R.W. (1991). What do we need to know for good practice?Social Work, 36, 198-199.
14.
Indermaur, D. (1990). Prisoners' experience with alcohol In J. Vernon (Ed.), Alcohol and crime.Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Criminology.
15.
Mahoney, M.J. (1976). Science as subject: The psychological imperative.Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
16.
Malinowski, B. (1948). Magic, science and religion and other essays.Norwich, CT: Free Press.
17.
Mistroff, I.I. (1974). The subjective side of science.New York: Elsevier.
18.
Peile, C. (1988). Research paradigms in social work: From stalemate to creative synthesisSocial Service Review , 62, 1-19.
19.
Pieper, M.H. (1985). The future of social work researchSocial Work Research and Abstracts, 21, 3-11.
20.
Popper, K.R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge.New York: Harper & Row.
21.
Segal, S.P. (1972). Research on outcomes of social work interventionsJournal of Health and Social Behavior , 13, 3-17.
22.
Walker, B. (1993). Science: The feminist's scapegoatThe Skeptical Inquirer, 18, 68-72.
23.
Weber, M. (1963). The sociology of religionBoston: Beacon.
