Single-system methodology in social work practice has gained momentum in recent years. This
article explores the role of this research method in doctoral education. The authors present
results of a survey of 47 social work doctoral programs in regard to single-system methodology
in doctoral curricula and its use m dissertations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bloom, M., & Fischer, J. (1982). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable professional. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
2.
Commission on Accreditation. (1984). Handbook of accreditation standards and procedures. New York: Author.
3.
Council on Social Work Education. (1982). Curriculum policy for the master's degree and baccalaureate degree programs in social work education. Social Work Education Reporter, 30(3), 5-12.
4.
Crane, D.R. (1985). Single-case experimental designs in family therapy research: Limitations and considerations. Family Process, 24, 69-77.
5.
Crow, R.T., & Kindelsperger, K.W. (1975). The PhD or the DSW ? Journal of Education for Social Work,11(3), 38-43.
6.
DeWeaver, K.L., Kilpatrick, A.C., & Smith, M.L. (1986). Single-subject methodology across the levels of social work education : Continuity or confusion? Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, Miami, FL.
7.
Figueira-McDonough, J. (1981). Doctoral programs in social work: The market for and training of social work PhDs. Journal of Education for Social Work, 17(2), 76-84.
8.
Fraser, M.W., Jenson, J.M., & Lewis, R E. (1991). Training for research scholarship in social work doctoral programs. Social Service Review, 65, 597-613.
9.
Harrison, D.F., & Thyer, B.A. (1988). Doctoral research on social work practice: A proposed agenda. Journal of Social Work Education, 24, 107-114
10.
Kazdin, A.E. (1978). Methodological and interpretive problems of single-case experimental designs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 46, 629-642.
11.
Levy, R.L. (1981). On the nature of the clinical-research gap: The problems with some solutions. Behavioral Assessment, 3, 235-242.
12.
Nelsen, J.C. (1981). Issues in single-subject research for nonbehaviorists . Social Work Research & Abstracts, 17, 31-37.
13.
Nelsen, J.C. (1985). Single-subject research. In R. L. Grinnell, Jr. (Ed.), Social work research and evaluation (2nd ed., pp. 362-399). Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
14.
Rosen, A. (1979). Evaluating doctoral programs in social work: A case study. Social Work Research & Abstracts, 15(4), 19-27.
15.
Rosen, A. (1981). Toward a function-related organization of doctoral education. Journal of Education for Social Work, 17(2), 69-75.
16.
Royse, D. (1980). Social work doctoral education programs: A consumer's eye-view. Journal of Education for Social Work, 16(2), 43-48.
17.
Rubin, A., & Davis, R.J. (1981). The elusive doctoral curriculum: A dilemma for the social work profession. Aretê, 6(3), 1-9.
18.
Thyer, B.A., & Maddox, K. (1988). Behavioral social work: Results of a national survey on graduate curricula. Psychological Reports, 63, 239-242.
19.
Thyer, B.A., & Thyer, K.B. (1992). Single-subject research designs in social work practice: A bibliography from 1965 to 1990. Research on Social Work Practice, 2, 99-116.
20.
Witkin, S.L. (1991). Empirical clinical practice: A critical analysis . Social Work, 36, 158-163.
