Bakanic, V., McPhail, C., & Simon, R. (1987). The manuscript review and decision making process . American Sociological Review, 39, 596-606.
2.
Beyer, J.M. (1978). Editorial policies and practices among leading journals in four scientific fields. Sociological Quarterly , 19, 68-88.
3.
Cole, J.R., & Cole, S. (1973). Social stratification in science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Eberley, S., & Warner, W.K. (1990). Fields or subfields of knowledge: Rejection rates and agreement in peer review. American Sociologist, 21, 217-231.
5.
Else, J.F. (1978). The state of social work journal publications: Patterns and implications. Social Work, 23, 267-273.
6.
Fanshel, D. (Ed.). (1980). The future of social work research. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.
7.
Fox, M.F. (1989). Disciplinary fragmentation, peer review, and the publication process. American Sociologist, 20, 188-191.
8.
Garfield, E. (1988). Social sciences citation index. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information .
9.
Garfield, E. (1989). Journal citation reports. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information .
10.
Garvey, W.D., & Griffith, B.C. (1971). Scientific communication: Its role in the conduct of research and creation of knowledge. American Psychologist, 26, 349-362.
11.
Gustin, B.H. (1973). Charisma, recognition, and the motivation of scientists . AmericanJournal of Sociology, 78, 1119-1134.
12.
Hargens, L.L. (1988). Scholarly consensus and journal rejection rates . American Sociological Review, 53, 139-151.
13.
Huxley, P. (1986). Statistical errors in the British Journal of Social Work, Volumes 1-14. British Journal of Social Work, 6, 645-658.
14.
Huxley, P. (1988). Quantitative-descriptive articles in the British Journal of Social Work, Vol umes 1-14. British Journal of Social Work, 18, 189-199.
15.
Kahn, A. J. (Ed.). (1973). Shaping the new social work. New York: Columbia University Press.
16.
Lin, N., Garvey, W.D., & Nelson, C.E. (1970). A study of the communication structure of science . In C. E. Nelson & D. K. Pollack (Eds.), Communication among scientists and engineers (pp. 23-60). Lexington, MA: Heath.
17.
Lindsey, D. (1976). Distinction, achievement, and editorial board membership. American Psychologist, 31, 799-804.
18.
Lindsey, D. (1978). The scientific publication system in the social sciences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
19.
Lindsey, D. (1988). Assessing precision in the manuscript review process: A little better than a dice roll. Scientometrics, 14, 75-84.
20.
Lindsey, D. (1989). Citation counts as a measure of quality in science: Advances toward a theory of citations. Scientometrics, 15, 189-203.
21.
Lindsey, D. (1991). Precision in the manuscript review process: Hargens and Herting revisited. Scientometrics, 21, 313-327.
22.
Lindsey, D., & Kirk, S.A. (1992). The role of social work journals in the development of a knowledge base for the profession. Social Service Review , 66, 295-310.
23.
Mahoney, M.J. (1976). Scientist as subject: The psychological imperative . Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
24.
Mendelsohn, H.N. (1987). An author's guide to social work journals (rev. ed.). New York: National Association of Social Workers.
25.
Pardeck, J.T. (1992). Are social work journal editorial boards competent? Some disquieting data with implications for research on social work practice . Research on Social Work Practice, 2,487-496.
26.
Pfeffer, J., Leong, A., & Strehl, K. (1977). Paradigm development and particularism: Journal publication in three scientific disciplines. Social Forces , 55, 938-951.
27.
Price, D.J. (1970). Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and nonscience. In C. E. Nelson & D. K. Pollack (Eds.), Communication among scientists and engineers. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
28.
Rushton, J.P., & Roediger, H.L. (1978). An evaluation of 80 psychology journals based on the Science Citation Index. American Psychologist , 33, 520-523.
29.
Teevan, J.J. (1980). Journal prestige and quality of sociological articles . American Sociologist, 15, 109-112.
30.
Tomer, C. (1986). A statistical assessment of two measures of citation: The impact factor and the immediacy index. Information Processing and Management, 22, 251-258.
31.
White, M., & White, G. (1977). Citation analysis of psychology journals. American Psychologist, 32, 301-305.
32.
Zuckerman, H., & Merton, R.K. (1971). Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalization, structure and function of the referee system. Minerva, 9, 66-100.