Based on the Risk-Need-Responsivity model (RNR) and Good Lives Model (GLM), the research developed and validated the Risk Evaluation and Need Enhancement for Well-being (RENEW) tool to systematically evaluate the risks and human needs of the community corrections population.
Methods
Using an umbrella review that included 37 review articles, we constructed risk and human need dimensions with designed negative correlations. Items were developed and refined via expert consultation and in-person interviews. The t-test and Rasch model item fit analysis optimized the tool. Internal consistency, reliability, and criterion validity were analyzed to ensure the scientific rigor and effectiveness.
Results
The final 36-item RENEW tool, comprising 10 risk items and 26 need items, demonstrated good reliability and validity.
Discussion
This RENEW enables the effective evaluation of the risks and human needs of the community corrections population, guiding tailored interventions for social work practice that aim to reduce recidivism and promote social inclusion.
AbracenJ.LoomanJ. (2016). The risk–need–responsivity model: An expansion and revision with an emphasis on groups of high-risk, high-need offenders. In AbracenJ.LoomanJ. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook on the theories, assessment and treatment of sexual offending (pp. 399–419). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118574003.wattso019
2.
AbracenJ.LoomanJ.FergusonM.HarkinsL.MaillouxD. (2011). Recidivism among treated sexual offenders and comparison subjects: Recent outcome data from the Regional Treatment Centre (Ontario) high-intensity Sex Offender Treatment Programme. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17(2), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600903511980
3.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (1995). The level of service inventory–Revised: User’s manual. Multi-Health Systems.
4.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018362
5.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.HogeR. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), 19–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854890017001004
6.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.WormithJ. S. (2004). Level of service/case management inventory: An offender assessment system. Multi-Health Systems.
7.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.WormithJ. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128705281756
AromatarisE.FernandezR.GodfreyC. M.HollyC.KhalilH.TungpunkomP. (2015). Summarizing systematic reviews: Methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. JBI Evidence Implementation, 13(3), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000055
10.
BarnaoM. (2022). The good lives model: A strength-based approach to rehabilitating offenders. In WattsR.ChrzanowskiW. (Eds.), Clinical forensic psychology: Introductory perspectives on offending (pp. 539–554). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80882-2_27
11.
BartlettC.DinsmoreJ.GilbertJ. M.KornblumA.LathamJ.OliffH.PaisnerS.SuttonD. (2005). Substance Abuse Treatment For Adults in the Criminal Justice System. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 44. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
12.
Barton-BellessaS. M.HanserR. D. (2011). Community-based corrections: A text/reader. Sage Publications.
13.
BasantaJ. L.FariñaF.ArceR. (2018). Risk-Need-Responsivity model: Contrasting criminogenic and noncriminogenic needs in high and low risk juvenile offenders. Children and Youth Services Review, 85(3), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.12.024
14.
Basto-PereiraM.ComeçanhaR.RibeiroS.Maia (2015). Long-term predictors of crime desistance in juvenile delinquents: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25(Part B), 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.09.012
15.
BazemoreG.SchiffM. (1996). Community justice/restorative justice: Prospects for a new social ecology for community corrections. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 20(2), 311–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.1996.9678579
16.
BernardJ.HaasK.SilerB.WeatherbyG. A. (2017). Perceptions of rehabilitation and retribution in the criminal justice system: A comparison of public opinion and previous literature. Journal of Forensic Sciences and Criminal Investigation, 5(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.19080/JFSCI.2017.05.555669
BogaertsS.SpreenM.MasthoffE.JankovicM. (2020). Longitudinal network structure and changes of clinical risk and protective factors in a nationwide sample of forensic psychiatric patients. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 64(15), 1533–1550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X20923256
19.
BondT. G.FoxC. M. (2013). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Psychology Press.
20.
BontaJ.AndrewsD. A. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). Routledge.
21.
BontaJ.BlaisJ.WilsonH. A. (2014). A theoretically informed meta-analysis of the risk for general and violent recidivism for mentally disordered offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(3), 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.04.014
22.
BooneW. J. (2016). Rasch analysis for instrument development: Why, when, and how?CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), rm4. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-04-0148
23.
BooneW. J.NoltemeyerA. (2017). Rasch analysis: A primer for school psychology researchers and practitioners. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1416898. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1416898
24.
BoscM.DubiniA.PolinV. (1997). Development and validation of a social functioning scale, the Social Adaptation Self-evaluation Scale. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 7(1), S57–S70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-977X(97)00420-3
25.
BouffardJ. A.TaxmanF. S.SilvermanR. (2003). Improving process evaluations of correctional programs by using a comprehensive evaluation methodology. Evaluation and Program Planning, 26(2), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(03)00010-7
26.
BowlesR. P.RamN. (2006). Using Rasch measurement to investigate volleyball skills and inform coaching. Journal of Applied Measurement, 7(1), 39–54.
27.
CaudyM. S.DursoJ. M.TaxmanF. S. (2013). How well do dynamic needs predict recidivism? Implications for risk assessment and risk reduction. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(6), 458–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.08.004
ChaminukaA. S.PrybutokG.PrybutokV. R.SennW. D. (2024). Systematic review: HIV, aging, and housing—A North American perspective, 2012–2023. Healthcare, 12(10), 992. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12100992
30.
ChangC.-C.ChenC.-Y.LeeH.-S.LeeC.-C. (2024). Benchmarking cognitive domains for llms: Insights from Taiwanese Hakka culture. 2024 27th Conference of the Oriental COCOSDA International Committee for the Co-ordination and Standardisation of Speech Databases and Assessment Techniques (O-COCOSDA).
31.
ChangL. (1994). A psychometric evaluation of 4-point and 6-point Likert-type scales in relation to reliability and validity. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18(3), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169401800302
32.
ChaviraD.Lopez-TamayoR.JasonL. A. (2018). Factors associated with community corrections involvement among formerly incarcerated people in recovery. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 29(9), 909–924. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403416644012
CherneyA. (2021). The release and community supervision of radicalised offenders: Issues and challenges that can influence reintegration. Terrorism and Political Violence, 33(1), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2018.1530661
ChyungS. Y.RobertsK.SwansonI.HankinsonA. (2017). Evidence-based survey design: The use of a midpoint on the Likert scale. Performance Improvement, 56(10), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21727
37.
ClaryE.SnyderM.RidgeR.CopelandJ.StukasA.HaugenJ.MeineP. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1516–1530. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1516
38.
CongZ.GaoW. (1999). The developm entofself-acceptance questionnaire and the testofitsreliability and validity. Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science, 8(1), 20–22. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.1999.01.007
39.
CottleC. C.LeeR. J.HeilbrunK. (2001). The prediction of criminal recidivism in juveniles: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28(3), 367–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854801028003005
40.
CullenF. T.JonsonC. L.MearsD. P. (2017). Reinventing community corrections. Crime and Justice, 46(1), 27–93. https://doi.org/10.1086/688457
41.
CunhaO.PedrosaJ.Silva PereiraB.CaridadeS.de Castro RodriguesA.BragaT. (2024). Intervention program dropout among perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A meta-analysis of correlated variables. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 25(4), 2735–2751. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380231224036
42.
DalsklevM.CunninghamT.DempsterM.HannaD. (2021). Childhood physical and sexual abuse as a predictor of reoffending: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 22(3), 605–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019869082
43.
DancetE. A.NelenW. L.SermeusW.De LeeuwL.KremerJ. A.D'HoogheT. M. (2010). The patients’ perspective on fertility care: A systematic review. Human Reproduction Update, 16(5), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmq004
44.
DicksonS. R.WillisG. M.MatherD. (2018). Protective factors and the good lives model: Combining positive approaches to assessment and treatment. In JeglicE.CalkinsC. (Eds.), New frontiers in offender treatment (pp. 43–56). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01030-0_3
45.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa490113
DowningS. (2006). Twelve steps for effective test development. In DowningS. M.HaladynaT. M. (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 3–5). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
48.
DuanW.BuH. (2017). Development and initial validation of a short three-dimensional inventory of character strengths. Quality of Life Research, 26(9), 2519–2531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1579-4
49.
DuanW.GuanQ.ShengJ.QiB. (2020). Initial development of the Social Work Core Competency Inventory. The British Journal of Social Work, 50(3), 722–740. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz013
50.
DuanW.HoS. M. Y.YuB.TangX.ZhangY.LiT.YuenT. (2012). Factor structure of the Chinese Virtues Questionnaire. Research on Social Work Practice, 22(6), 680–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731512450074
51.
DuanW.SunX.WangZ. (2025). Gaps between supply and utilization of social work evidence in Mainland of China. Research on Social Work Practice, 35(2), 206–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315231225151
52.
DuanW.WangZ.YangC.KeS. (2024). Are risk-need-responsivity principles golden? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of community correction programs. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 20(2), 593–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-022-09550-w
53.
EisenbergM. J.Van HornJ. E.DekkerJ. M.AssinkM.Van Der PutC. E.HendriksJ.StamsG. J. J. (2019). Static and dynamic predictors of general and violent criminal offense recidivism in the forensic outpatient population: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(5), 732–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854819826109
54.
EngelC.GoergS. J.TraxlerC. (2022). Intensified support for juvenile offenders on probation: Evidence from Germany. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 19(2), 447–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12311
55.
ErciB.YıldızE.ÖztürkS. (2020). Psychometric evaluation of beliefs and attitudes of drug use scale in youth. Journal of Substance Use, 25(5), 550–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/14659891.2020.1745308
56.
EriksonK. T. (1964). Review of outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance, by H. S. Becker. American Journal of Sociology, 69(4), 417–419. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2775112 https://doi.org/10.1086/223626
57.
Expósito-ÁlvarezC.SantirsoF. A.GilchristG.GraciaE.LilaM. (2023). Participants in court-mandated intervention programs for intimate partner violence perpetrators with substance use problems: A systematic review of specific risk factors. Psychosocial Intervention, 32(2), 89. https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2023a7
58.
FazelS.ChangZ.FanshaweT.LångströmN.LichtensteinP.LarssonH.MallettS. (2016). Prediction of violent reoffending on release from prison: Derivation and external validation of a scalable tool. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(6), 535–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366
59.
FeiL.ShenQ.ZhengY.ZhaoJ.JiangS.WangL.WangX. (1991). Preliminary evaluation of Chinese version of FACES ll and FES: Comparison of normal families and families of schizophrenic patients. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 5(5), 198–202+238. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:ZXWS.0.1991-05-001
60.
FisherR. A. (1970). Statistical methods for research workers. In KotzS.JohnsonN. L. (Eds.), Breakthroughs in statistics: Methodology and distribution (pp. 66–70). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_6
61.
FoxK. J. (2014). Restoring the social: Offender reintegration in a risky world. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 38(3), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2013.848221
62.
FrancalanciC.ChiassaiS.FerraraG.FerrettiF.MatteiR. (2011). Scale for the measurement of attitudes towards alcohol. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 46(2), 133–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agq094
63.
FranchignoniF.MandrioliJ.GiordanoA.FerroS.GroupE. (2015). A further Rasch study confirms that ALSFRS-R does not conform to fundamental measurement requirements. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration, 16(5-6), 331–337. https://doi.org/10.3109/21678421.2015.1026829
64.
GalanisP.KatsiroumpaA.VrakaI.SiskouO.KonstantakopoulouO.MoisoglouI.GallosP.KaitelidouD. (2023). The quiet quitting scale: Development and initial validation. AIMS Public Health, 10(4), 828. https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2023055
GerholdC. K.BrowneK. D.BeckettR. (2007). Predicting recidivism in adolescent sexual offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(4), 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2006.10.004
67.
GoodleyG.PearsonD.MorrisP. (2022). Predictors of recidivism following release from custody: A meta-analysis. Psychology, Crime & Law, 28(7), 703–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2021.1962866
GumaniM. A. (2014). Concepts of multifaceted social support in operational work in the lives of South African Police Service members. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 40(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10520/EJC163922
70.
GutierrezL.WilsonH. A.RuggeT.BontaJ. (2013). The prediction of recidivism with Aboriginal offenders: A theoretically informed meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 55(1), 55–99. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2011.E.51
71.
HamiltonM. (2015). Back to the future: The influence of criminal history on risk assessments. Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law, 20(1), 76–133.
72.
HanafiA. I.HoeseinZ. A. (2024). Assimilation program as a form and form of correctional philosophy in restoring life, life, and livelihood for prisoners and realizing community-based correction institutions. Edunity Kajian Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan, 3(12), 1148–1156. https://doi.org/10.57096/edunity.v3i12.338
73.
HanniballK. B.ViljoenJ. L.ShafferC. S.BhattG.TweedR.AkninL. B.GagnonN.DouglasK. S.DooleyS. (2021). The role of life satisfaction in predicting youth violence and offending: A prospective examination. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(11-12), 5501–5529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518805103
74.
HansonR. K.BourgonG.HelmusL.HodgsonS. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(9), 865–891. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809338545
75.
HansonR. K.BussiereM. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.348
76.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2019). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. In Karl HansonR.Morton-BourgonK. E. (Eds.), Clinical forensic psychology and law (pp. 67–76). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351161565-5
77.
HarperC. A.LievesleyR.BlagdenN.AkermanG.WinderB.BaumgartnerE. (2021). Development and validation of the Good Lives Questionnaire. Psychology, Crime & Law, 27(7), 678–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2020.1849695
78.
HartgerinkC. H.Van BeestI.WichertsJ. M.WilliamsK. D. (2015). The ordinal effects of ostracism: A meta-analysis of 120 Cyberball studies. PloS One, 10(5), e0127002. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127002
79.
HayD. E.BleicherS.AzoulayR.KivityY.Gilboa-SchechtmanE. (2023). Affective and cognitive impact of social overinclusion: A meta-analytic review of cyberball studies. Cognition and Emotion, 37(3), 412–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2022.2163619
80.
JewellL. M.WormithJ. S. (2010). Variables associated with attrition from domestic violence treatment programs targeting male batterers: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(10), 1086–1113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810376815
81.
JimenezA. C.DelgadoR. H.VardsveenT. C.WienerR. L. (2018). Validation and application of the LS/CMI in Nebraska probation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(6), 863–884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818763231
82.
JoshiA.KaleS.ChandelS.PalD. K. (2015). Likert Scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/bjast/2015/14975
KatsiyannisA.WhitfordD. K.ZhangD.GageN. A. (2018). Adult recidivism in United States: A meta-analysis 1994–2015. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(3), 686–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0945-8
85.
KeeleyJ. W.GaebelW.FirstM. B.PetersonD. L.RebelloT.SharanP.ReedG. M. (2018). Psychotic disorder symptom rating scales: Are dichotomous or multi-point scales more clinically useful?—An ICD-11 field study. Schizophrenia Research, 202, 254–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2018.07.006
86.
KeenanM.WardT.ZinsstagE. (2024). The Good Lives Model and restorative justice: Combined potential in cases of sexual violence. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 30(3), 292–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2022.2136412
87.
KooB. M.VizerL. M. (2019). Examining mobile technologies to support older adults with dementia through the lens of personhood and human needs: Scoping review. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 7(11), e15122. https://doi.org/10.2196/15122
88.
KossonD. S.WalshZ.AndersonJ. R.BrookM.SwoggerM. T.VerborgR. (2019). Evaluation of a cognitive-behavioral intervention for high- and medium-risk probationers. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 37(4), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2394
89.
KreisM. K.SchwannauerM.GillingsK. (2014). Relational risk factors for reoffending in women: A systematic review. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(4), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2014.962713
90.
KubiszynT.BorichG. D. (2024). Educational testing and measurement. John Wiley & Sons.
91.
KuźmaB.SzulawskiM.VansteenkisteM.CantareroK. (2020). Polish adaptation of the basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 30–34. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03034
92.
LambertiJ. S.KatsetosV.JacobowitzD. B.WeismanR. L. (2020). Psychosis, mania and criminal recidivism: Associations and implications for prevention. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 28(3), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1097/hrp.0000000000000251
LiX.DuanW. (2021). 循证社会工作的科学价值与学科价值——兼论开展循证社会工作的若干原则与方法 [scientific value and discipline value of evidence-based social work: Some principles and methods of evidence-based social work.]. 社会工作 [Journal of Social Work], 21(3), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-4828.2021.03.001
96.
LiaoY.ShenH.DuanW.CuiS.ZhengC.LiuR.JiaY. (2024). Development of the psychopathological vulnerability index for screening at-risk youths: A Rasch model approach. NPJ Mental Health Research, 3, Article 60. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-024-00106-6
97.
LinY. (2016). Research on the Risk Assessment of Community Correction in China (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Chongqing: Southwest University of Political Science and Law. https://doi.org/10.7666/d.D01160885
LoomanJ.AbracenJ. (2013). The risk need responsivity model of offender rehabilitation: Is there really a need for a paradigm shift?International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 8(3-4), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100980
102.
LovinsB. K.Brusman-LovinsL.WilliamsT. (2023). The integration of a coaching framework into the Risk, Need, and Responsivity model for corrections. Journal of Community Justice, 32(4), 11-12, 27–30.
103.
LutzM.ZaniD.FritzM.DudeckM.FrankeI. (2022). A review and comparative analysis of the risk-needs-responsivity, good lives, and recovery models in forensic psychiatric treatment. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, Article 988–905. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.988905
104.
MalikM. A. A.MustaphaM. F.SobriN. M.Abd RazakN. F.ZaidiM. N. M.ShukriA. A.ShamM. A. L. Z. (2021). Optimal reliability and validity of measurement model in confirmatory factor analysis: Different Likert point scale experiment. Journal of Contemporary Issues and Thought, 11(1), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.37134/jcit.vol11.9.2021
105.
MallionJ. S.WoodJ. L.MallionA. (2020). Systematic review of ‘Good Lives’ assumptions and interventions. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 55, Article 101510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101510
106.
McCannK.LussierP. (2008). Antisociality, sexual deviance, and sexual reoffending in juvenile sex offenders: A meta-analytical investigation. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 6(4), 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204008320260
107.
McCoachD. B.GableR. K.MaduraJ. P.McCoachD. B.GableR. K.MaduraJ. P. (2013). Review of the steps for designing an instrument. In Instrument development in the affective domain: School and corporate applications (pp. 277–284). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7135-6_8
108.
MilojevićS.DimitrijevićA. A.MarjanovićZ. J.DimitrijevićA. (2016). Bad past, gloomy future: The trait emotional intelligence profile of juvenile offenders. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 295–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.040
109.
Morais-GonçalvesD.Lopes-BorgesS.GasparH. (2018). Reincidência, fatores de risco e avaliação de risco em vítimas de violência doméstica. Trabajo Social Global – Global Social Work, 8(15), 78–113. https://doi.org/10.30827/tsg-gsw.v8i15.7424
MundfromD. J.ShawD. G.KeT. L. (2005). Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. International Journal of Testing, 5(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4
112.
NorthernJ. J.O'BrienW. H.GoetzP. W. (2010). The development, evaluation, and validation of a financial stress scale for undergraduate students. Journal of College Student Development, 51(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0108
113.
OlverM. E.StockdaleK. C.HelmusL. M.WoodsP.TermeerJ.PrinceJ. (2024). Too risky to use, or too risky not to? Lessons learned from over 30 years of research on forensic risk assessment with Indigenous persons. Psychological Bulletin, 150(5), 487–553. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000414
114.
OlverM. E.StockdaleK. C.WormithJ. S. (2011). A meta-analysis of predictors of offender treatment attrition and its relationship to recidivism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022200
115.
ParkE.-Y.ShinI.-S.KimJ.-H. (2012). A meta-analysis of the variables related to depression in Korean patients with a stroke. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 42(4), 537–548. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2012.42.4.537
116.
PengC.FanX.LiL. (2003). The validity and reliability of social avoidance and distress scale in Chinese students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 11(4), 279–281. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-3611.2003.04.012
117.
PettersenC.WanamakerK. A.GarveyM. L.BrownS. L.GoodwinJ. (2024). Mental disorder and women’s recidivism: A meta-analysis. Feminist Criminology, 19(1), 25–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/15570851231213100
118.
PettyS.HarveyK.GriffithsA.ColestonD. M.DeningT. (2018). Emotional distress with dementia: A systematic review using corpus-based analysis and meta-ethnography. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 33(5), 679–687. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.4870
119.
PiqueroA. R.JenningsW. G.DiamondB.ReingleJ. M. (2015). A systematic review of age, sex, ethnicity, and race as predictors of violent recidivism. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X13514733
120.
PolaschekD. L. (2012). An appraisal of the risk–need–responsivity (RNR) model of offender rehabilitation and its application in correctional treatment. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02038.x
121.
PriceJ. P. (2019). Testing construct redundancy: Resilience, grit, hardiness, and mental toughness. Saint Mary’s University. https://library2.smu.ca/handle/01/29003
122.
PurvisM.WardT.WillisG. (2011). The Good Lives Model in practice: Offence pathways and case management. European Journal of Probation, 3(2), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/206622031100300202
123.
QuirouetteM. (2022). “The Struggle is Real”: Punitive assessment in community services. Punishment & Society, 24(3), 433–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474521990436
124.
RashidR. A.AbdullahR.GhulmanH. A.MasodiM. S. (2008). Application of Rasch-based ESPEGS model in measuring generic skills of engineering students: A new paradigm. Advances in Engineering Education, 5(8), 591–602.
RothwellA.ArnoldJ. (2007). Self-perceived employability: Development and validation of a scale. Personnel Review, 36(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480710716704
127.
SacksS.ChapleM.SacksJ. Y.McKendrickK.ClelandC. M. (2012). Randomized trial of a reentry modified therapeutic community for offenders with co-occurring disorders: Crime outcomes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 42(3), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2011.07.011
128.
SchaeferL.LittleS. (2020). A quasi-experimental evaluation of the “environmental corrections” model of probation and parole. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 16(4), 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-019-09373-2
129.
SchmittD. P.AllikJ. (2005). Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in 53 nations: Exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 623–642. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.623
130.
ScottT.BrownS. L. (2018). Risks, strengths, gender, and recidivism among justice-involved youth: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 86(11), 931–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000343
131.
SerieC. M.Van DammeL.PleysierS.De RuiterC.PutJ. (2021). The relationship between primary human needs of the Good Lives Model (GLM) and subjective well-being in adolescents: A multi-level meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 61(6), 101651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101651
132.
SlempG. R.FieldJ. G.ChoA. S. (2020). A meta-analysis of autonomous and controlled forms of teacher motivation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 121, 103459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103459
133.
SlempG. R.FieldJ. G.RyanR. M.FornerV. W.Van den BroeckA.LewisK. J. (2024). Interpersonal supports for basic psychological needs and their relations with motivation, well-being, and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 127(5), 1012–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000459
134.
SlempG. R.KernM. L.PatrickK. J.RyanR. M. (2018). Leader autonomy support in the workplace: A meta-analytic review. Motivation and Emotion, 42(5), 706–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9698-y
135.
SmithD. R.ConroyM. J.BrakhageD. H. (1995). Efficiency of adaptive cluster sampling for estimating density of wintering waterfowl. Biometrics, 51(2), 777–788. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532964
136.
SonderenE. v.SandermanR.CoyneJ. C. (2013). Ineffectiveness of reverse wording of questionnaire items: Let’s learn from cows in the rain. PloS One, 8(7), e68967. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068967
137.
StegerM. F.FrazierP.OishiS.KalerM. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80
138.
SumintonoB.WidhiarsoW. (2015). Aplikasi pemodelan rasch pada assessment pendidikan. Trim Komunikata.
139.
TaberK. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(1), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
140.
TangJ. (2017). The formulation of the scale of college students’ participation in social activities. Journal of Science and Education, (2), 146–148. https://doi.org/10.16871/j.cnki.kjwhb.2017.01.065
141.
TaxmanF. S.SmithL. (2021). Risk-need-responsivity (RNR) classification models: Still evolving. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 59(3), 101459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101459
142.
Van de MortelT. F. (2008). Faking it: Social desirability response bias in self-report research. The Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(4), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.210155003844269
143.
Van den BroeckA.FerrisD. L.ChangC.-H.RosenC. C. (2016). A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195–1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316632058
144.
VansteenkisteM.RyanR. M. (2013). On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23(3), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032359
145.
WaiS. T.BondA. J. (2007). Psychometric analysis of the Chinese version of Social Adaptation Self-evaluation Scale (C-SASS). Psychiatry Research, 153(3), 277–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2006.09.009
146.
WangX.LvG. (2024). Practice and prospects of social work interventions in community corrections. International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, 6(12), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2024.061204
WardT.FortuneC.-A. (2013). The good lives model: Aligning risk reduction with promoting offenders’ personal goals. European Journal of Probation, 5(2), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/206622031300500203
149.
WardT.MelserJ.YatesP. M. (2007). Reconstructing the Risk–Need–Responsivity model: A theoretical elaboration and evaluation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(2), 208–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2006.07.001
WatsonD.FriendR. (1969). Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33(4), 448–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027806
152.
WilcoxK. R. (1995). An evaluation design for the Montana Department of Corrections and Human Services’ intensive supervision program. University of Montana. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/9086
153.
WilfongJ.GolderS.LoganT.HigginsG. (2021). Examining the infuence of fnancial assistance and employment services on the criminal justice outcomes of women on probation. Aflia, 36(2), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109920919180
154.
WillemseH.GeenenR.Van LoeyN. E. (2021). Reliability and structural validity of the Dutch version of perceived stigmatization questionnaire in adults with burns. Burns, 47(6), 1381–1388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2020.11.017
155.
WilsonR. J.YatesP. M. (2009). Effective interventions and the Good Lives Model: Maximizing treatment gains for sexual offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14(3), 157–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.01.007
156.
WormithJ. S.HoggS. M.GuzzoL. (2015). The predictive validity of the LS/CMI with Aboriginal offenders in Canada. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(5), 481–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814552843
XiaoS.YangD. (1987). Effects of social support on physical and mental health. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 1(4), 183–187. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:ZXWS.0.1987-04-016
159.
XiongC.XuY. (2009). Reliability and validity of the satisfaction with life scale for Chinese Demos. China Journal of Health Psychology, 17(08), 948–949. https://doi.org/10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2009.08.026
160.
XuH.LiuX. (2024). Do they pose a danger: Evaluation of the recidivism characteristics in China’s community corrections?Journal of Psychological Research, 5(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.30564/jpr.v5i1.5340
161.
XuZ.PanZ.WangY.ZhangY.LengP. (2024). Research on a machine learning-based adaptive and efficient screening model for psychological symptoms of community correctional prisoners. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 98–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60181-9
162.
YamagishiT.JinN.MillerA. S. (1998). In-group bias and culture of collectivism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1(3), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00020
YogeshwarD.SinghJ.SaharanA. K.SharmaS.ChoudharyA.MathurM. K.SainiH. N.SheokandD. (2024). The Indian geriatrics quality of life inventory scale (IGQOLI): Development and validation of a scale to evaluate the quality of life among geriatric population of India. Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 14(2), 80–87. https://doi.org/10.15280/jlm.2024.14.2.80
165.
YoussefC. (2024). From bars to breakthroughs: The application of self-determination theory to offender programs. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 35(6), 935–958. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2024.2390122
166.
YuanL.PoulinJ. E. (2008). 助人关系量表简介 [A brief introduction of the helping relationship inventory]. 社会工作（理论版） [Journal of Social Work], 2, 4–7.
167.
YudhaR. P. (2023). Higher order thinking skills (HOTS) test instrument: Validity and reliability analysis with the rasch model. EduMa: Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v12i1.9468
168.
YukhnenkoD.BlackwoodN.FazelS. (2020). Risk factors for recidivism in individuals receiving community sentences: A systematic review and meta-analysis. CmarshallNS Spectrums, 25(2), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852919001056
169.
ZeccolaJ.KeltyS. F.BoerD. (2021). Does the good lives model work? A systematic review of the recidivism evidence. The Journal of Forensic Practice, 23(3), 28-5–2300. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-03-2021-0010
170.
ZhaoQ.LiuX. (2012). Reliability and validity of the hypertension patients self-management behavior rating scale(HPSMBRS). Chinese Nursing Management, 12(11), 26–31. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:GLHL.0.2012-11-014
171.
ZivR. (2017). The future of correctional rehabilitation: Moving beyond the RNR model and good lives model debate. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315105505
