Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Evolution of Social Work Knowledge Production Over 35 Years: An AI-Enabled Analysis of Trends in Empiricism,Methodology,Collaboration,Citation Patterns,and Output
Purpose: This study developed a comprehensive bibliographic infrastructure addressing systematic coverage gaps in social work literature indexing and examined disciplinary knowledge production patterns from 1989 to 2025. Method: Article metadata was compiled from Web of Science, Scopus, Directory of Open Access Journals, and web scraping. A small language model performed classification and extraction tasks on abstracts. Results: Analysis of 62,602 scientific articles from 88 journals (1989–2025) revealed 4.9% annual growth. Empirical research increased from 43% to 72% of publications. Methodological composition shifted from quantitative dominance (69% of empirical studies in the 1990s) to methodological pluralism (47% qualitative, 44% quantitative in the 2020s). Author collaboration increased, with mean authors per article rising from 1.85 to 3.35. Citation analysis shows 17.5% of articles remain uncited. Discussion: Findings document exponential growth alongside substantial increases in empiricism, coauthorship, and qualitative methods. Persistent challenges in citation database coverage systematically disadvantage scholarship published outside mainstream commercial indexing systems.
BirkleC.PendleburyD. A.SchnellJ.AdamsJ. (2020). Web of science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00018
2.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed). Sage Publications.
3.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed). Sage Publications.
4.
de Solla PriceD. J. (1963). Little science, big science. Columbia University Press.
5.
EcklM.GhanemC.LöwensteinH. (2019). Evolution of social work from disconnected groups to a scientific community: A social network analysis. The British Journal of Social Work, 49(2), 428–447. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcy050
6.
HaghaniM. (2023). What makes an informative and publication-worthy scientometric analysis of literature: A guide for authors, reviewers and editors. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 22, 100956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2023.100956
7.
KringsA.VictorB. G.MathiasJ.PerronB. E. (2020). Environmental social work in the disciplinary literature, 1991–2015. International Social Work, 63(3), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872818788397
8.
LamontM. (2009). How professors think: Inside the curious world of academic judgment. Harvard University Press.
9.
LarsenP.von InsM. (2010). The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by science citation Index. Scientometrics, 84(3), 575–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0202-z
10.
LuanH.PerronB. E.VictorB. G.WanG.NiuY.XiaoX. (2024). Using artificial intelligence to support scientometric analysis of scholarly literature: A case example of research on mainland China's left-behind children. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 15(3), 435–457. https://doi.org/10.1086/731613
MartínezM. A.CoboM. J.HerreraM.Herrera-ViedmaE. (2015). Analyzing the scientific evolution of social work using science mapping. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731514522101
PacchioniG. (2018). The overproduction of truth: Passion, competition, and integrity in modern science. Oxford University Press.
15.
PadgettD. K. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research (2nd ed). Sage Publications.
16.
PerronB. E.LuanH.QiZ.VictorB. G.GoyalK. (2025). Demystifying application programming interfaces (APIs): Unlocking the power of large language models and other web-based AI services in social work research. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 16(2), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1086/735364
17.
PerronB. E.LuanH.VictorB. G.Hiltz-PerronO.RyanJ. (2024). Moving beyond ChatGPT: Local large language models (LLMs) and the secure analysis of confidential unstructured text data in social work research. Research on Social Work Practice, 35(6), 695–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315241280686. (Original work published 2025)
18.
PerronB. E.QiZ. (2025). Theoretical and Methodological Shifts in Social Work Research: An AI-Driven Analysis of Postmodern and Critical Theory at the SSWR Annual Conference. Research on Social Work Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315251352838
19.
PerronB. E.VictorB. G.HodgeD. R.Salas-WrightC. P.VaughnM. G.TaylorR. J. (2017). Laying the foundations for scientometric research: A data science approach. Research on Social Work Practice, 27(7), 802–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731515624966
20.
RosenA.ProctorE. K.StaudtM. M. (1999). Social work research and the quest for effective practice. Social Work Research, 23(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/23.1.4
21.
SinghV. K.SinghP.KarmakarM.LetaJ.MayrP. (2021). The journal coverage of web of science, scopus and dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5113–5142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5
22.
ThyerB. A.MyersL. L. (2011). The quest for evidence-based practice: A view from the United States. Journal of Social Work, 11(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017310381812
23.
VictorB. G.HodgeD. R.PerronB. E.VaughnM. G.Salas-WrightC. P. (2017). The rise of co-authorship in social work scholarship: A longitudinal study of collaboration and article quality, 1989–2013. British Journal of Social Work, 47(8), 2201–2216. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw059
WitkinS. L. (2011). Social construction and social work practice: Interpretations and innovations. Columbia University Press.
26.
WongC. Y. (2019). A century of scientific publication: Towards a theorization of growth behavior and research-orientation. Scientometrics, 119(1), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03048-5
27.
WuchtyS.JonesB. F.UzziB. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
