Purpose: Gifted adolescents experience unique stress patterns requiring specialized assessment, yet validated screening tools remain limited. Method: This study developed and validated a brief instrument with 633 gifted adolescents (ages 12–15, M = 13.5, SD = 1.1) from Turkish Science and Art Centers using exploratory (n = 221) and confirmatory (n = 382) factor analyses. The sample included students from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds across urban and suburban regions. Results: The 24-item scale demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties (χ²/df = 2.47, Comparative Fit Index = 0.86, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.072, α = .766) across five dimensions: emotion regulation, perfectionism, hypersensitivity, positive reappraisal, and social support. Criterion validity was supported through moderate correlation (r = .43, p < .05) with an established coping measure. Discussion: This validated tool enables rapid identification of stress vulnerabilities and coping resources. The multidimensional structure informs intervention planning by identifying clinical targets while acknowledging limitations including marginally acceptable fit indices and modest reliability for two subscales requiring future refinement.
AblardK. E.ParkerW. D. (1997). Parents’ achievement goals and perfectionism in their academically talented children. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26(6), 651–667. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022392524554
2.
AmirkhanJ. H. (1990). A factor analytically derived measure of coping: The coping strategy indicator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 1066–1074. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.1066
3.
BabaevaJ.BrisevaY.KoltsovaA. (2013). Coping behavior and difficult life situations of Russian school-students with different intelligence levels. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(3), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n3p489
4.
Bahar-AydınK. (2005). Akış kuramına dayalı stresle başa çıkma grup programının ergenlerin stresle başa çıkma stratejilerinin etkisi [The effect of flow theory-based stress coping group program on adolescents’ stress coping strategies][Doctoral dissertation, Ankara University].
5.
BarkhamM.de JongK.DelgadilloJ.LutzW. (2023). Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) and feedback: Research review and recommendations. Psychotherapy Research, 33(7), 841–855. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2023.2181114
6.
BüyüköztürkŞ (2004). Veri analizi el kitabı[Data analysis handbook]. Pegem A Yayıncılık.
7.
BüyüköztürkŞ (2008). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (9th ed.)[Data analysis handbook for social sciences]. Pegem Akademi.
8.
ChanD. W. (2006). Adjustment problems, self-efficacy, and psychological distress among Chinese gifted students in Hong Kong. Roeper Review, 28(4), 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190609554365
9.
ChanD. W. (2010). Perfectionism among Chinese gifted and nongifted students in Hong Kong: The use of the revised almost perfect scale. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(1), 68–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321003400104
10.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11.
CrossT. L.CrossJ. R. (2015). Clinical and mental health issues in counseling the gifted individual. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2015.00192.x
DavaslıgilÜ (2004). Üstün çocukların eğitimi [Education of gifted children]. In ŞirinM. R.KulaksızoğluA.BilgiliA. E. (Eds.), Üstün yetenekli çocuklar seçilmiş makaleler kitabı[Gifted children selected articles book] (pp. 233–246). Çocuk Vakfı Yayınları.
14.
DeVellisR. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
15.
DixonF. A.LapsleyD. K.HanchonT. A. (2004). An empirical typology of perfectionism in gifted adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620404800203
16.
EndersC. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. Guilford Press.
17.
ErdemŞBaloğluM. (2018). Gifted adolescents’ stress sources, reactions against stress and comparison with general adolescent population. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 19(3), 598–609. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.472139
18.
FieldA. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). Sage.
19.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
20.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
21.
JöreskogK. G.SörbomD. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International.
22.
KlineR. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
LeechN. L.BarrettK. C.MorganG. A. (2005). SPSS for intermediate statistics: Use and interpretation (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25.
MendaglioS. (2007). Dabrowski's theory of positive disintegration. Great Potential Press.
26.
MoosR. H. (1993). Coping Responses Inventory: Adult Form professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
27.
MuellerC. E. (2009). Protective factors as barriers to depression in gifted and nongifted adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208326552
28.
MullickM. S. I.AlginS.IslamM.PhillipsonA.NaharJ. S.MorshedN. M.ShahidS. F. B. (2019). Dhaka Stress scale-adolescent: A scale for assessing psychosocial stressors among adolescents. Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Journal, 12(4), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.3329/bsmmuj.v12i4.44273
29.
NeihartM.PfeifferS. I.CrossT. L. (2016). The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (2nd ed.). Prufrock Press.
30.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
31.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
32.
PetersM. P.Fonseca-PedreroE.VidalC. P.AlmeidaL. S.BetancortM.AragonésD. (2019). Perfectionism and social anxiety in gifted children. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 12(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.30552/ejep.v12i2.271
33.
PetersonJ. S. (2009). Myth 17: Gifted and talented individuals do not have unique social and emotional needs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(4), 280–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209346946
34.
SchulerP. A. (2000). Perfectionism and gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11(4), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2000-629
35.
SilvermanL. K. (2002). Asynchronous development. In NeihartM.ReisS. M.RobinsonN. M.MoonS. M. (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 31–37). Prufrock Press.
36.
SwiatekM. A.DorrR. M. (1998). Revision of the Social Coping Questionnaire: Replication and extension of previous findings. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 10(1), 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X9801000108
37.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
38.
ThompsonB. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10694-000
39.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.CrossT. L.OlenchakF. R. (2009). Social-emotional curriculum with gifted and talented students. Prufrock Press.
