Organizational support represents a critical driver of practice research projects. This analysis includes four international examples of such support (Norway, Finland, Belgium, and USA and China). The four studies capture the similarities and differences between university support and national government support. The analysis is placed within the context of defining practice research and the core components of organizational support. The findings emerged from presentations in a Practice Research Collaborative sponsored by the International Community on Practice Research in Social Work. The conclusion includes a discussion of a cross-case analysis along with the identification of implications for practice research studies in social work and affiliated professional disciplines.
AddamsJ. (2019). Twenty years at hull house. In The greatest works of Jane Addams (pp. 171–312). Madison & Adams Press.
2.
AustinM. J.CarnochanS. (2020). Practice research in the human services: A university-agency partnership model. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3.
AustinM.JohannessenA. (Eds.) (2015). Special issue. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 12(1), 1–6.
4.
AustinM. J.Dal SantoT.LeeC. (2012). Building organizational supports for research-minded practitioners. Special issue. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 9(1/2), 174–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15433714.2012.636327
5.
AustinM. J.HopkinsK. M. (Eds.) (2004). Supervision as Collaboration in the Human Services. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
DeweyJ. (1920/1988). Reconstruction in philosophy. In BoydstonJ. A. (Ed.), The middle works of John Dewey 1899–1924, Volume 1 (pp. 77–201). Southern Illinois University Press.
GarvinD. A.EdmondsonA. C.GinoF. (2008). Is yours a learning organization?Harvard Business Review, 86, 109–116.
10.
GjernesT.BliksvaerT. (2011). Nye samarbeidsformer—nye læringsformer. Sluttrapport fra evalueringen av forsøket Høgskole- og universitetssosialkontor (HUSK). [New Collaborations—New Learning: Evaluation of the HUSK Program], NF-report, Bodø:Nordland Research Institute.
11.
GraafG.McBeathB.LwinK.HolmesD.AustinM. J. (2017). Supporting evidence- informed practice in human service organizations: An exploratory study of link officers. Human Service Organizations, 41(1), 58–75.
12.
HartmanY.DarabS. (2012). A call for slow scholarship: A case study on the intensification of academic life and its implications for pedagogy. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 34(1–2), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714413.2012.643740
13.
HoeijmakersM.HartingJ.JansenM. (2013). Academic Collaborative Centre Limburg: A platform for knowledge transfer and exchange in public health policy, research and practice?Health Policy, 111(2), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.04.004
14.
JohannessenA.EideS. B. (2015). Evidence from social service enhancement projects: Selected cases from Norway’s HUSK project. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 12(1), 7–31.
15.
JuvonenT. (2014). Kulttuurisesti määrittynyt täytyminen osana nuorten aikuisten toimijuutta [culturally defined expectations of human agency among adolescents]. Nuorisotutkimus, 32(3), 3–16.
16.
KääriäinenA.MuurinenH. (2019). Combining practice and theory in professional fieldwork: A guidebook to facilitate practice and theory groups. University of Helsinki – Publications of the Faculty of Social Sciences.
17.
KimM.MasonD. P. (2020). Are you ready? Financial management, operating reserves, and the immediate impact of COVID-19 on nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(6), 1191–1209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764020964584
18.
Kwan ChanC.LeiJ. (2017). Contracting social services in China: The case of the integrated family services centres in Guangzhou. International Social Work, 60(6), 1343–1357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872817725135
19.
LevrouwD.DevlieghereJ.VandeveldeS.RooseR. (2020). Developing a positive living climate in residential youth care: A qualitative study. Children and Youth Services Review, 116, 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105221
20.
LevrouwD.RooseR.van der HelmP.StrijboschE.VandeveldeS. (2018). Developing a positive living group climate in residential youth care: A single case study. Child & Family Social Work, 23(4), 709–716. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12467
21.
McBeathB.AustinM. J.CarnochanS.ChuangE. (2021). Practice research method in social work: Processes, applications and implications for social service organisations. The British Journal of Social Work, 18(6), 1–19.
22.
MokK. H.ChanC. K.WenZ. (2020). State-NGOs relationship in the context of China contracting out social services. Social Policy & Administration, 55(4), 687–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12651
23.
MollemanG.FransenG. (2012). Academic collaborative centres for health promotion in The Netherlands: Building bridges between research, policy, and practice. Family Practice, 29(suppl 1), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmr073
24.
MuurinenH.KääriäinenA. (2020). Integrating theory and practice in social work: An intervention with practitioners in Finland. Qualitative Social Work, 19(5/6), 1200–1218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325019900287
25.
MuurinenH.KääriäinenA. (2022). Using theory in practice—An intervention supporting research dissemination in social work. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 46(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2021.1935376
26.
MuurinenH.SatkaM. (2020). Pragmatist knowledge production in practice research. In L. Joubert & M. Webber (Eds.), The Routledge handbook on social work practice research (pp. 126–136). Routledge.
27.
NatlandS. (2015). Dialogical communication and empowering social work practice. Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 12(1), 80–91.
28.
NatlandS. (2020). Recently, I have felt like a service user again: Conflicts in collaborative research, a case from Norway. In H. McLaughlin, P. Beresford, C. Cameron, H. Casey, & J. Duffy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of service user involvement in human services, research and education (pp. 467–476). Routledge.
29.
NatlandS.HansenR. (2017). Conflicts and empowerment—A processual perspective on the development of a partnership. European Journal of Social Work, 20, 497–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2016.1207615
30.
Neely-BarnesS.HunterA.MeimanJ.MaloneC.HirschiM.DelavegaE. (2021). Leaning into the crisis: Managing COVID19 in social services and behavioral health agencies. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 45(4), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2021.1915905
31.
SteensR.Van RegenmortelR.HermansK. (2018). Beyond the research-practice gap: The development of an academic collaborative centre for child and family social work. British Journal of Social Work, 48, 1611–1626. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx126
32.
Van der HelmG. H. P. (2011). First do no harm. SWP Publishers.
33.
WangY.JiangN.ZhangH.LiuZ. (2020). Organizational justice, burnout, and turnover intention of social workers in China. Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/1468017320911347
34.
XuB. (2021). Points of view from human service leaders: Yueqin Ma. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 45(1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2021.1872972
35.
ZhangZ.GuoC. (2021). Nonprofit-government relations in authoritarian China: A review and synthesis of the Chinese literature. Administration & Society, 53(1), 64–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399720934891
