In this analysis, we contend that theorizing strengthens the connections between practice and research by requiring researchers to check their working assumptions, premises, conclusions, and implications for research, theory, and practice. Our exploration of the process of theorizing in practice research is rooted in the concept of “sensemaking” (Weick, 1995) whereby practice researchers engage in disciplined imagination by reflecting on diverse forms of evidence, being attentive to specific practices and problems, and moving between intuition and reasoned explanation. The analysis includes the following components: 1) tools for theorizing from research findings (abductive analysis and problematization), 2) processes for theorizing about practice research findings (focusing on practice, researcher repertoire, and theory development processes), 3) an example of theorizing from key findings, and 4) the construction of interventive theory. It concludes with implications for social work practice research.
AlvessonM.KärremanD (2007). Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development. The Academy of Management Review. 32(4), 1265–1281. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586822
2.
AlvessonM.SandbergJ (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247–271. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.59330882
3.
AustinM. J.CarnochanS (2020). Practice research in the human services: A university-agency partnership model. Oxford University Press.
4.
BialikJ (2017). Creating a taxonomy of outcomes in a comprehensive nonprofit human services organization. Human Service Organizations, 41(3), 201–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2017.1321283.
5.
BrekkeJ. S (2014). A science of social work, and social work as an integrative scientific discipline: Have we gone too far, or not far enough?Research on Social Work Practice, 24(5), 517–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731513511994.
6.
BriarS.MillerH (1971). Problems and issues in social casework. Columbia University Press.
7.
BrowerR. S.AbolafiaM. Y.CarrJ. B (2000). On improving qualitative methods in public administration research. Administration & Society, 32(4), 363-397. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953990022019470.
8.
CarnochanS.AustinM. J (2015). Redefining the bureaucratic encounter between service providers and service users: Evidence from the Norwegian HUSK Projects. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 12(1), 64–79.
9.
CarnochanS.McBeathB.ChuangE.AustinM. J (2019). Perspectives of public and nonprofit managers on communications in human services contracting. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(3), 657–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1495085
10.
CarnochanS.MolinarLBrownJ.BotzlerL.GundersonK.HenryC.AustinM.J. (2019). A Casebook for Learning and Teaching. Cognella Academic Publishing. Public Child Welfare.
11.
CarnochanS.WeissingerE.HenryC.Liner-JigamianN.AustinM. J (2019). Using qualitative datamining to identify skillful practice in child welfare case records. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 13(4), 419–440.
12.
ChuangE.McBeathB.CarnochanC.AustinM. J (2020). Relational mechanisms in complex contracting: Factors associated with private managers’ satisfaction with and commitment to the contract relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz021.
13.
DawsonD. L.MoghaddamN. G (2016). Formulation in action: An introduction (pp. 3–8). In DawsonD. L.MoghaddamN. G. (Eds.), Formulation in Action: Applying Psychological Theory to Clinical Practice. Walter de Gruyter.
14.
EngeströmY (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In EngeströmY.MiettinenR.PunamakiR.-L. (Eds.), Perspectives on Activity Theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511812774.003.
15.
FlyvbjergB. (2001). Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How it Can Succeed Again. Cambridge University Press.
16.
FunnellS.RogersP. (2011). Purposeful Program Theory: Effective Use of Theories of Change and Logic Models. Jossey Bass.
17.
GarvinD (2000). Learning in Action: A Guide to Putting the Learning Organization to Work. Harvard Business School Press.
18.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
19.
GraafG.McBeathB.LwinK.HolmesD.AustinM. J (2017). Supporting evidence- informed practice in human service organizations: An exploratory study of link officers. Human Service Organizations. 41(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2016.1192575.
20.
HenryC.CarnochanS.AustinM.J. (2014) Using Qualitative Data-Mining for Practice Research in Child Welfare. Child Welfare.
21.
JoubertL.WebberM (Eds.), (2020). The Routledge handbook of social work practice Research. Routledge.
22.
KimberlinS.SchwartzS.AustinM. J (2011). Growth and resilience of pioneering nonprofit human service organizations: A cross-case analysis of organizational histories. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 8(1–2), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15433710903272820
LewinK (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers (p. 169). Harper & Row
25.
McBeathB.CarnochanS.StuartM.AustinM. J (2017). The managerial and relational dimensions of public-nonprofit human service contracting. Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation, 3(2), 51–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055563617723225.
26.
McBeathB.ChuangE.CarnochanS.AustinM. J.StuartM (2019). Service coordination by public sector managers in a human service contracting environment. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 46(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-018-0899-1.
27.
MulroyE.AustinM. J (2004). Towards a comprehensive framework for understanding the social environment: In search of theory for practice. Journal of Human Behavior and the Social Environment, 10(3), 25–59.
28.
PloyhartR. E.BartunekJ. M (2019). Editors’ Comments: There is nothing so theoretical as good practice – a call for phenomenal theory. Academy of Management Review. 44(3), 493–497. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0087.
29.
Practice-based research in child welfare. Child Welfare, 93(6), 7–25.
30.
RothmanJ (1974). Planning and organizing for social change: Action principles from social science research. Columbia University Press.
31.
StoneS.AustinM. J.BerzinA.TaylorS (2007). Exploring the knowledge base of human behavior and the social environment using the concept of reciprocity. Journal of Human Behavior and the Social Environment, 16(3), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1300/10911350802107769.
32.
SuddabyR.HardyC.HuyQ. N (2011). Introduction to special topic forum: Where are the new theories of organization?Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 236–246. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.36.2.zok236.
33.
SutherlandJ.W. (1975). Systems: Analysis, administration, and architecture. Van Nostrand.
34.
TavoryI.TimmermansS (2014). Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research. University of Chicago Press.
35.
Ting-ToomeyS (2005). The matrix of face an updated face-negotiation theory. In GudykunstW. B. (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 71-92). Sage.
