Virtue theorists debate qualities of society leading to human flourishing. Thus, aspects of scholarship on virtue theory may refine conceptualization of social good. We focus on the virtue of solidarity and its contributions to the ethical foundations of social good, providing a core connection to macro-level social work interventions and settings.
Methods:
We first identify a theoretical gap in the conceptual framework of social good, then use virtue theory and the example of solidarity to connect the concept of social good to social work professional values and macro practice.
Results:
Our primary critique of the concept of social good is the lack of a sufficient ethical frame that addresses social justice, value foundations, or power analysis.
Discussion:
Without this, the discussion of social good lacks tools needed to critically assess relevant systems of change and innovative technologies. Consequently, the work of social good risks reinforcing existing status quo and oppressive systems.
AugsbergerA.CollinsM. E.GeckerW.LuskK.ZhaoQ. J. (2017). “She treated us like we bring valid ideas to the table:” Youth experiences and perceptions of a youth-led participatory budgeting process. Children and Youth Services Review, 76, 243–249.
4.
BanksS.GallagherA. (2009). Ethics in professional life: Virtues for health & social care. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
5.
BartlettR. C. (2002). Socratic political philosophy & the problem of virtue. American Political Science Review, 96, 525–533.
6.
CandaE. R.FurmanL. D. (2010). Spiritual diversity in social work practice: The heart of helping. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7.
Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. (2018). Social determinants of health: Know what affects health. Retrieved fromhttps://www.cdc.gov/socialdeterminants/
8.
Chamiec-CaseR. (2013). The contribution of virtue ethics to a richer understanding of social work competencies. Social Work & Christianity, 40, 251–270.
9.
ClarkL. S. (2003). Challenges of social good in the world of Grant theft auto & Barbie: A case study of a community computer center for youth. New Media and Society, 5, 95–116.
10.
ClarkM. J. (2014). The vision of Catholic social thought: The virtue of solidarity & the praxis of human rights. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
11.
CnaanR. A.BoddieS. C.WineburgR. J. (1999). The newer deal: Social work and religion in partnership. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
12.
CobbenP. (2012). The paradigm of recognition: Freedom as overcoming the fear of death. Boston, MA: Brill.
13.
CollinsM. E.CooneyK.GarlingtonS. (2012). Compassion in contemporary social policy: Applications of virtue theory. Journal of Social Policy, 41, 251–269.
14.
CollinsM. E.GarlingtonS. (2017). Compassionate response: Intersections of religion & public policy. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work, 36, 391–408.
15.
CollinsM. E.GarlingtonS.CooneyK. (2015). Relieving human suffering: Compassion in social policy. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 48, 95–120.
16.
CooneyK. (2016). The institutional & technical structuring of nonprofit ventures: Case study of a U.S. hybrid organization caught between two fields. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary & Non-profit Organizations, 17, 137–155.
17.
DalyD. J. (2011). Structures of virtue & vice. New Blackfriars, 92, 341–357.
18.
DonaldsonL. P.MayerL. M. (2014). Justice as a core virtue for social work practice. Social Work & Christianity, 41, 207–231.
19.
DoranK. (1996). Solidarity: A synthesis of personalism & communalism in the thought of Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
20.
DuffyJ.McKeeverB. (2012). Looking out from the middle: Influencing policy change through user involvement. In BarnesM.CotterellP. (Eds.), Critical perspectives on user involvement (pp. 101–114). Abingdon, VA: Policy Press.
GarfinkelI.RainwaterL.SmeedingT. (2010). Wealth & welfare states: Is America a laggard or a leader?New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23.
GarlingtonS. B. (2014). Value orientations of social welfare policy structures. International Journal of Social Welfare, 23, 287–295.
24.
GarlingtonS. B. (2017). Congregations in the community: A case study of social welfare provision. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 44, 5–25.
25.
GoldenR. L. (2011). Coordination, integration, & collaboration: A clear path for social work in health care reform. Health in Social Work, 36, 227–228.
26.
GordonR.Russell-BennettR.LefebvreR. C. (2016). Social marketing: The state of play & brokering the way forward. Journal of Marketing Management, 32, 1059–1082.
27.
HerediaR. C. (2011). Just ends through just means: Justice as liberty, equality, solidarity. Economic & Political Weekly, 46, 47–54.
28.
HillK. M.FergusonS. M.EricksonC. (2010). Sustaining & strengthening a macro identity: The association of macro practice social work. Journal of Community Practice, 18, 513–527.
29.
HonnethA. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
HookerR. S. (2009). Do physician assistants provide a “social good” for America?Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants, 22, 12.
31.
HuberE.StephensJ. D. (2001). Development & crisis of the welfare state: Parties & policies in global markets. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
JohnstonD. L. (2014). A Muslim & Christian orientation to human rights: Human dignity & solidarity. Indiana International & Comparative Law Review, 24, 899–920.
34.
KasperD. V. S. (2007). Privacy as a social good. Social Thought & Research, 28, 165–189.
LejanoR. P. (2006). Frameworks for policy analysis: Merging text & context. New York, NY: Routledge.
37.
LoobuyckP. (2012). Creating mutual identification & solidarity in highly diversified societies: The importance of identification by shared participation. South African Journal of Philosophy, 31, 560–575.
38.
MacIntyreA. (1981). After virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
39.
ManzC. C.CameronK. S.ManzK. P.MarxR. D. (2008). The virtuous organization: Insights from some of the world’s leading management thinkers. Singapore, Singapore: World Scientific.
40.
McBeathB. (2016). Re-envisioning macro social work practice. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 97(1), 5–14.
41.
McBeathG.WebbS. A. (2002). Virtue ethics & social work: Being lucky, realistic, & not doing one’s duty. British Journal of Social Work, 32, 1015–1036.
42.
Mor BarakM. E. (2018). The practice & science of social good: Emerging paths to positive social impact. Research on Social Work Practice, 1–12. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1049731517745600
43.
Movement for Black Lives. (2018). A vision for Black lives: Policy demands for Black power, freedom, & justice. Retrieved fromhttps://policy.m4bl.org/
44.
OrtegaO. (1994). The gospel of solidarity. The Ecumenical Review, 46, 135–141.
45.
OttmannJ. (2010). Social exclusion in the welfare state: The implications of welfare reforms for social solidarity & social citizenship. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 11, 23–37.
46.
OvereemP.TholenB. (2011). After managerialism: MacIntyre’s lessons for the study of public administration. Administration and Society, 43, 722–748.
47.
ReichS. M.ReichJ. A. (2006). Cultural competence in interdisciplinary collaborations: A method for respecting diversity in research partnerships. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 1–7.
48.
RothmanJ. (2013). Education for macro intervention: A survey of problems & prospects. Chicago, IL: Association for Community Organization and Social Administration.
49.
SchneiderA.IngramH. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics & policy. American Political Science Review, 87, 334–347.
50.
SkocpolT.EvansP.RueschemeyerD. (1985). Bringing the state back in. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
51.
SzostakR. (2002). Politics and the five types of ethical analysis. International Journal of Politics and Ethics, 2, 275–290.
52.
SzostakR. (2005). Unifying ethics. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
53.
ter MeulenR. (2016). Solidarity, justice, & recognition of the other. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 37, 517–529.
VerdugoR. R. (2013). School reform: Community, corporatism, & the social good. International Journal of Educational Reform, 22, 118.
56.
WeaverG. R. (2006). Virtue in organizations: Moral identity as a foundation for moral agency. Organization Studies, 27, 341–368.
57.
WrightT. A.GoodsteinJ. (2007). Character is not “dead” in management research: A review of individual character & organizational-level virtue. Journal of Management, 33, 928–958.
