A Comparison of Foster Care Reentry After Adoption in Two Large U.S. States

Abstract

Purpose:

This study examines foster care reentry after adoption, in Illinois and New Jersey. The provision of services and supports to adoptive families have garnered recent attention due to concern about the long-term stability of adoptive homes.

Method:

This study used administrative data to examine the pre-adoption characteristics associated with post-adoption foster care reentry. Children were tracked longitudinally, using administrative data, for five to fifteen years (depending on their date of adoption), or the age of majority.

Results:

Results indicated that most (95%) children did not reenter foster care after adoption. Findings from survival models suggested key covariates that may help to identify children most at risk for post-adoption reentry: child race, age at adoption, number of placement moves in foster care, and time spent in foster care prior to adoption.

Conclusion:

Study findings may help identify families most at-risk for post-adoption difficulties in order to develop preventative adoption service.

Keywords

adoption field of practice postadoption foster care reentry survival analysis postpermanency discontinuity foster care child welfare quantitative methodological article

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997. (1997). 42 U. S. C. § Pub. L. No. 105-89, 1305, 111 Stat 2115.

Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980. (1980). 42 U. S. C. § Pub. L. No. 96-272, 94 Stat. 500.

Allison

P. D.

(2010). Survival analysis. In Hancock

G. R.

Mueller

R. O.

(Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social science (pp. 413–424). New York, NY: Routledge.

Barbosa-Ducharne

Marinho

(this issue). Beyond the child’s age at placement: Risk and protective factors in pre-adoption breakdown in Portugal. Research on Social Work Practice, 29, 143–152.

Barth

R. P.

Berry

Yoshikami

Goodfield

R. K.

Carson

M. L.

(1988). Predicting adoption disruption. Social Work, 33, 227–233. doi:10.1093/sw/33.3.227

Barth

R. P.

Gibbs

D. A.

Siebenaler

(2001). Literature review: Assessing the field of post-adoption service: Family needs, program models and evaluation issues. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.

Berry

Barth

R. P.

(1990). A study of disrupted adoptive placements of adolescents. Child Welfare, 69, 209–225.

Charlie & Nadine, H. v. Corzine, 99-3678. (D.N.J. 1999).

Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2011). Family reunification: What the evidence shows. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Children’s Bureau.

10.

Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2012). Providing postadoption services. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau.

11.

Coakley

J. F.

Berrick

J. D.

(2008). Research review: In a rush to permanency: Preventing adoption disruption. Child & Family Social Work, 13, 101–112. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2006.00468.x

12.

Congress.gov. (2017). H.R.5353—100th Congress: Family Preservation Act of 1988. Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/bill/100th-congress/house-bill/5353/cosponsors

13.

Cox

D. R.

(1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 34, 187–220.

14.

Festinger

(2002). After adoption: Dissolution or permanence? Child Welfare, 81, 515–533.

15.

Festinger

Maza

(2009). Displacement or post-adoption placement? A research note. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 3, 275–286. doi:10.1080/15548730903129889

16.

Fluke

J. D.

Harden

Jenkins

Ruehrdanz

(2010) Research synthesis on child welfare disproportionality and disparities. Washington, DC: American Humane Association and Center for the Study of Social Policy.

17.

Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008. (2008). 42 U. S. C. § Pub. L. No. 110-351, 122 Stat. 3943.

18.

Fuller

Bruhn

Cohen

Lis

Rolock

Sheridan

(2006). Supporting adoptions and guardianship in Illinois: An analysis of subsidies, services and spending. Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, School of Social Work.

19.

Green

D. K.

Belanger

McRoy

R. G.

Bullard

(2011). Challenging racial disproportionality in child welfare: Research, policy, and practice. Washington, DC: CWLA Press.

20.

Guo

(2010). Survival analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

21.

Howard

J. A.

Smith

S. L.

(2003). After adoption: The needs of adopted youth. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America Press.

22.

Howell

D. C.

(2002). Statistical methods for psychology. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.

23.

Humphreys

K. L.

Gleason

M. M.

Drury

S. S.

Miron

Nelson

C. A.

Fox

N. A.

Zeanah

C. H.

(2015). Effects of institutional rearing and foster care on psychopathology at age 12 years in Romania: Follow-up of an open, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Psychiatry, 2, 625–634. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00095-4

24.

Jones

A. S.

LaLiberte

(2010, May). Adoption disruption and dissolution report. Saint Paul: Center for Advanced Studies in Child Welfare, School of Social Work, University of Minnesota. Retrieved from http://cascw.umn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/AdoptionDissolutionReport.pdf

25.

Kaplan

R. M.

Chambers

D. A.

Phil

Glasgow

R. E.

(2014). Big data and large sample size: A cautionary note on the potential for bias. Clinical Translational Science, 7, 342–346. doi:10.1111/cts.12178

26.

Lieberman

A. F.

(2003). The treatment of attachment disorder in infancy and early childhood: Reflections from clinical intervention with later-adopted foster care children. Attachment & Human Development, 5, 279–282.

27.

Merrit

D. H.

Festinger

(2013). Post-adoption service need and access: Differences between international, kinship and non-kinship foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 1913–1922. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.09.013

28.

New Jersey Department of Children and Families. (2010). New Jersey Department of Children and Families policy manual. Retrieved from http://www.nj.gov/dcf/policy_manuals/CPP-IV-A-11-100_issuance.shtml

29.

New Jersey Department of Human Services, Office of Children’s Services. (2006). New Jersey child welfare reform: Focusing on the fundamentals. Retrieved from http://www.state.nj.us/dcf/documents/home/NJ_CWR_Focusing_on_the_Fundamentals_June_28_2006.pdf

30.

Palacios

Rolock

Selwyn

Barbosa-Ducharne

M. A.

(this issue). Adoption breakdown: Concept, research and implications. Research on Social Work Practice, 29, 130–142.

31.

Paniagua

Palacios

Jiménez-Morago

J. M.

Rivera

(this issue). Adoption breakdown in Spain: A survival and age-related analysis. Research on Social Work Practice, 29, 176–184.

32.

Pedhazur

E. J.

Schmelkin

L. P.

(1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

33.

Putnam-Hornstein

Needell

King

Johnson-Motoyama

(2013). Racial and ethnic disparities: A population-based examination of risk factors for involvement with child protective services. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37, 33–46. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2012.08.005

34.

Reilly

Platz

(2004). Post-adoption service needs of families with special needs children. Journal of Social Service Research, 30, 51–67. doi:10.1300/J079v30n04_03

35.

Rolock

(2015). Post-permanency continuity: What happens after adoption and guardianship from foster care? Journal of Public Child Welfare, 9, 153–173. doi:10.1080/15548732.2015.1021986

36.

Rolock

Pérez

A. G.

(2016). Three sides to a foster care story: An examination of the lived experiences of young adults, their foster care case record, and the space in between. Qualitative Social Work, 17, 195–215. doi:10.1177/1473325016666410

37.

Rolock

White

K. R.

(2016). Post-permanency discontinuity: A longitudinal examination of outcomes for foster youth after adoption or guardianship. Children and Youth Services Review, 70, 419–427. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.10.025

38.

Rosenthal

J. A.

(1993). Outcomes of adoption of children with special needs. The Future of Children, 3, 77–78. doi:10.2307/1602403

39.

Rosenthal

J. A.

Schmidt

Conner

(1988). Predictors of special needs adoption disruption: An exploratory study. Children and Youth Services Review, 10, 101–117. doi:10.1016/0190-7409(88)90031-X

40.

Sameroff

A. J.

MacKenzie

M. J.

(2003). Research strategies for capturing transactional models of development: The limits of the possible. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 613–640. doi:10.1017.S0954579403000312

41.

Selwyn

(this issue). Sibling relationships in adoptive families that disrupted or were in crisis. Research on Social Work Practice, 29, 165–175.

42.

Shapiro

S. P.

(2005). Agency theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 263–284.

43.

Smith

S. L.

(2006). A study of the Illinois adoption/guardianship preservation program. In Dore

(Ed.), The postadoption experience: Adoptive families’ service needs and service outcomes (pp. 67–94). Washington, DC: CWLA Press.

44.

Smith

S. L.

Howard

J. A.

(1991). A comparative study of successful and disrupted adoptions. Social Service Review, 65, 248–265.

45.

Smith

S. L.

Howard

J. A.

Garnier

P. C.

Ryan

S. D.

(2006). Where are we now? A post-ASFA examination of adoption disruption. Adoption Quarterly, 9, 19–44. doi:10.1300/J145v09n04_02

46.

Smith

S. L.

Howard

J. A.

Monroe

A. D.

(1998). An analysis of child behavior problems in adoptions in difficulty. Journal of Social Service Research, 24, 61–84. doi:10.1300/J079v24n01_03

47.

StataCorp. (2014). Fit a Cox proportional hazards model and check proportional hazards assumption with Stata. College Station, TX: Author. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ime8BaLLXxw

48.

StataCorp. (2015). Stata statistical software: Release 14. College Station, TX: Author.

49.

Testa

M. F.

(2010). Introduction. In Testa

M. F.

Poertner

(Eds.), Fostering accountability: Using evidence to guide and improve child welfare policy (pp. 3–34). New York, NY: Oxford.

50.

Testa

M. F.

(2013). Systems of kinship care: Enduring challenges and emerging opportunities. Journal of Family Social Work, 16, 349–363. doi:10.1080/10522158.2013.834169

51.

Testa

M. F.

Snyder

S. M.

Rolock

Liao

(2015). Adoption and guardianship: A moderated mediation analysis of predictors of post-permanency discontinuity. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 85, 107–118. doi:10.1037/ort0000019

52.

Tucker

D. J.

MacKenzie

M. J.

(2012). Attachment theory and change processes in foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 2208–2219. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.07.020

53.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). Child welfare outcomes 2000: Annual report. Washington, DC: Children’s Bureau, Administration for Children and Families.

54.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2005). A report to congress on adoption and other permanency outcomes for children in foster care: Focus on older children. Retrieved from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/congress_adopt.pdf

55.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2017). The AFCARS Report. Retrieved from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/afcarsreport24.pdf

56.

Vandivere

Malm

Radel

(2009). Adoption USA: A chartbook based on the 2007 National Survey of Adoptive Parents. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. Retrieved from http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/09/NSAP/chartbook/

57.

White

K. R.

(2016). Placement discontinuity for older children and adolescents who exit foster care through adoption or guardianship: A systematic review. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 33, 377–394. doi:10.1007/s10560-015-0425-1

58.

White

K. R.

(2014). Application of the life course perspective in child welfare research. Children and Youth Services Review, 46, 146–154. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.08.018

59.

Wijedasa

Selwyn

(2017). Examining rates and risk factors for post-order adoption disruption in England and Wales through survival analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 83, 179–189.

60.

Wulczyn

(2004). Family reunification. The Future of Children, 14, 95–113. doi:10.2307/1602756

61.

Ziliak

S. T.

McCloskey

D. N.

(2008). The cult of statistical significance: How the standard error costs us jobs, justice, and lives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.