Social work education grounded in social work practice has been recently challenged to examine the role of science in its history, core constructs and domains, philosophical underpinnings, and graduate curriculum. Doctoral education has been added to the scrutiny at the recent Science in Social Work Roundtable in Doctoral Education. Based on Lev Vygotsky’s scaffolding approach to facilitate learning, this article discusses doctoral student education with the four stages of (1) positioning doctoral students for a scientific career, (2) promoting doctoral students as scholars of the academy, (3) promulgating doctoral students as scientists of the profession, and (4) preparing doctoral student to be stewards of the discipline.
American Academy of Health Behavior Workgroup on Doctoral Education Training. (2006). A vision for doctoral education in health behavior: A position paper from the American Academy of Health Behavior. American Journal of Health Behavior29, 343–544.
2.
BickmanL.RogD. J. (Eds.). (1998). Handbook of applied social research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage.
3.
BrekkeJ. (2011). “It's not about fish and bicycles -- we need a science of social work”. Paper presented at the annual conference for the Society for Social Work and Research, Tampa, FL.
4.
BrekkeJ. (2012). Shaping the science of social work. Research on Social Work Practice. 22, 455–464.
5.
BrekkeJ. (2014). A science of social work and social work as an integrative scientific discipline: Have we gone too far or not far enough?Research on Social Work Practice, 24, 517–523.
6.
BrekkeJ.EllK.PalinkasL. (2007). Translational science at the National Institute of Mental Health: Can social work take its rightful place?Research on Social Work Practice, 17, 123–133.
7.
BooteD. N.BeileP. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34, 3–15.
8.
DavisK. (2011). The youngest science: Social work research as product and process in a competitive scientific market. Invited presidential address presented at the annual conference for the Society for Social Work and Research, Tampa, FL.
9.
FloerschJ.LonghoferJ. (2012). Philosophical foundations of our science: Fact/value and recent approaches from other fields. Invited paper presented at Science in Social Work Roundtable, Islandwood on Bainbridge Island, WA.
10.
FongR. (2012). Framing education for a science of social work: Missions, curriculum, and doctoral training. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 529–536.
11.
FongR. (2013). Framing doctoral education for a science of social work: Preparing stewards of the discipline, promoting scholars of the academy, and promulgating scientists of the profession. Invited paper presented at the Science in Social Work Doctoral Education Roundtable, Islandwood on Bainbridge Island, WA.
12.
FongR.PomeroyE. C. (2011). Translating research to practice. Social Work, 56, 5–7.
13.
GoldeC. M.WalkerG. E., & Associates. (2006). Envisioning the future of doctoral education: Preparing stewards of the discipline. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14.
HarringtonD.PetrC.BlackB.Cunningham-WilliamsR. (2013). “Quality guidelines for PhD programs in social work”. GADE Taskforce on Quality Guidelines. Unpublished manuscript, Group for the Advancement of Doctoral Education in Social Work.
15.
KaplanR. (2012). Opportunities and challenges in shaping our science: Are we on the right track for social work?Invited paper presented at Science in Social Work Roundtable, Islandwood on Bainbridge Island, WA.
16.
KirkS.ReidW. (2002). Science and social work: A critical appraisal. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
17.
LiechtyJ. M.SchullC. P.LiaoM. (2009). Facilitating dissertation completion and success among doctoral students in social work. Journal of Social Work Education, 45, 481–497.
18.
LonghoferJ.FloerschJ. (2012). The coming crisis in social work: Some thoughts on social work and science. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 499–519.
19.
MakiP.BorkowskiN. (Eds.). (2006). The assessment of doctoral education: Emerging criteria and new models for improving outcomes. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
20.
MarshJ. (2012). From fish and bicycles to a science of social work. Research on Social Work Practice. 22, 465–467.
21.
National Association of Social Work. (2013). From the President, can practitioners help shape a science of social work by Jeane Anastas. NASW News. Washington, DC, p. 1.
22.
NuriusP.BrekkeJ.FongR. (2010). “Translational research: A new horizon for social work research”. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Council of Social Work Education, Portland, OR.
23.
NuriusP.KempS. (2012). Social work, science, social impact: Creating an Integrative conversation. Research on Social Work Practice. 22, 548–552.
24.
PollioD. (2012). Training doctoral students to be scientists. Research on Social Work Practice. 22, 537–541.
25.
RaveisV. H.GardnerD. S.BerkmanB.HarootyanL. (2010). Linking the NIH strategic plan to the research agenda for social workers in health and aging. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 53, 77–93.
26.
SoydanH. (2012). Understanding social work in the history of ideas. Research on Social Work Practice, 22, 468–470.
27.
SullivanW. M.RosinM. S. (2008). A new agenda for higher education: Shaping a life of the mind for practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28.
UeharaE.FlynnM.FongR.BrekkeJ.BarthR.CoultonC.…WaltersK. (2013). Grand challenges for social work. Guest editorial. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 4, 165–170.
29.
VygotskyL. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
WalkerG.GoldeC.JonesL.BueschelA.HutchingsP. (2008). The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31.
WeinbachR. W.GrinnellR. M.Jr. (2007). Statistics for social workers (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
