AbellN.SpringerD. W.KamataA. (2009). Developing and validating rapid assessment instruments. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
BoutronI.RavaudP.MoherD. (2012). Randomized clinical trials of nonpharmacological treatments. New York, NY: CRC Press.
3.
Cabrera-NguyenP. (2010). Author guidelines for reporting scale development and validation results in the Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 1, 99–103.
FawcettS. E.WallerM. A.MillerJ. W.SchwietermanM. A.HazenB. T.OverstreetR. E. (2014). A trial guide to publishing success: Tips on writing influential conceptual, qualitative, and survey research. Journal of Business Logistics, 35, 1–16.
6.
GrantS.MontgomeryP.HopewellS.MacdonaldG.MoherD.Mayo-WilsonE. (2013). Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials. Research on Social Work Practice, 23, 595–602.
7.
HarrisonB. A.Mayo-WilsonE. (2014). Trial registration: Understanding and preventing bias in social work research. Research on Social Work Practice, 24, 372–376.
8.
HigginsJ. P. T.GreenS. (Eds.) (2009). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
9.
HodgeD. R.LacasseJ. R.BensonO. (2011). Influential publications in social work discourse: The 100 most highly cited articles in disciplinary journals: 2000-09. British Journal of Social Work, 42, 765–782.
10.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from the What Works Clearinghouse website:http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf
11.
MarshJ. C.ChaT.KuoE. (2004). Social work readers describe ‘useful knowledge’. Social Work, 49, 533–534.
12.
PrattM. G. (2009). From the editors: For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 856–862.
13.
RubinA.ParrishD. (2007). Problematic phrases in the conclusions of published outcome studies: Implications for evidence-based practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 17, 334–347.
14.
StallerK. M.Krumer-NevoM. (2013). Successful qualitative articles: A tentative list of cautionary advice. Qualitative Social Work, 12, 247–253.
15.
StewartL.MoherD.ShekelleP. (2012). Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense. Systematic Reviews, 1, 7. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-1-7
16.
ThyerB. A. (2006). A historical note on the relationship between the journal Research on Social Work Practice and the Society for Social Work and Research. Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 95–96.
17.
ThyerB. A. (2012). The scientific value of qualitative research for social work. Qualitative Social Work, 11, 115–125.
18.
ThyerB. A. (2014a). Evolving reporting guidelines for social work research. Nordic Social Work Research, 4, 1–4. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2014.916887
19.
ThyerB. A. (2014b). Improving publication standards for psychotherapy outcome studies. Journal of Evidence-based Psychotherapies, 14, 125–128.
20.
TongA.SainsburyP.CraigJ. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19, 349–357.