BogdanR.TaylorS. (1994). A positive approach to qualitative evaluation and policy research in social work. In ShermanE.ReidW. (Eds.), Qualitative research in social work (pp. 293–302). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
3.
BriarSMillerH. (1971). Problems and issues in social casework. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
4.
ByrneD. (2011). Applying social science. Bristol, England: The Policy Press.
5.
ClarkeRCornishD. (1972). The controlled trial in institutional research. London, England: HMSO.
6.
CookT.CampbellD. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
7.
CornishD.ClarkeR. (1975). Residential treatment and its effects on delinquency. London, England: HMSO.
8.
CronbachL. (1986). Social inquiry by and for Earthlings. In FiskeD. W.ShwederR. A. (Eds.), Metatheory in social science (pp. 83–107). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
CronbachL.AmbronS.DornbuschS.HessR.HornikR.PhillipsD.WeinerS. (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10.
FischerJ. (1976). The effectiveness of social casework. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
11.
FolkardS.SmithD. E.SmithD. D. (1976). IMPACT Intensive Matched Probation and Aftercare Treatment (II): The results of the experiment. London, England: HMSO.
12.
GoldbergE. M. (1970). Helping the aged. London, England: Allen and Unwin.
13.
KirkS. A.ReidW. J. (2002). Science and social work: A critical appraisal. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
14.
LoflandJ.SnowD.AndersenL.LoflandL. (2006). Analysing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
15.
MacDonaldM. E. (1966). Reunion at vocational high. Social Service Review, 40, 175–189.
16.
MadgeJ. (1963). The origins of scientific sociology. London, England: Tavistock.
17.
MannP. (1985). Methods of social investigation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
18.
MayerJ.TimmsN. (1970). The client speaks. London, England: Routledge Kegan Paul.
19.
MeyerH.BorgattaE.JonesW. (1965). Girls at vocational high. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
20.
MilesM.HubermanA. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
21.
MillerW. L.CrabtreeB. F. (2005). Clinical research. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 605–640). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
23.
ReidW. J. (1988). Service effectiveness and the social agency. In PattiR.PoertnerJ.RappC. (Eds.), Managing for effectiveness in social welfare organizations (pp. 41–60). New York, NY: Haworth.
24.
ReidW. J. (2002). In the land of paradigms, method rules. Qualitative Social Work, 1, 291–295.
25.
ReidW. J.ShyneA. (1969). Brief and extended casework. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
26.
ReidW. J.ZettergrenP. (1999). A perspective on empirical practice. In ShawI.LishmanJ. (Eds.), Evaluation and social work practice (pp. 41–62). London, England: SAGE.
ScrivenM. (1986). New frontiers of evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 7, 7–44.
29.
ShadishW.CookT.LevitonL. (1990). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
30.
ShawI. (1985). A closed profession?—Recruitment to social work. British Journal of Social Work, 15, 261–280.
31.
ShawI. (2005). Evidencing social work. In SommerfeldP. (Ed.), Evidence based practice (pp. 73–107). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
32.
ShawI. (2009). Ways of knowing in social work. In GrayM.WebbS. (Eds.), Social work theory and methods (pp. 184–194). London, England: SAGE.
33.
ShawI. (2010). Logics, qualities and quality in social work research. In ShawI.Briar-LawsonK.OrmeJ.RuckdeschelR. (Eds.), Sage handbook of social work research (pp. 246–263). London, England: SAGE.
34.
ShawI.BellM.SinclairI.SloperP.MitchellW.DysonP.RaffertyJ. (2009). An exemplary scheme? An evaluation of the integrated children’s system. British Journal of Social Work, 39, 613–626.
35.
ShawI.BloorM.CormackR.WilliamsonH. (1996). Estimating the prevalence of hard to reach populations: Illustration of mark-recapture methods in the study of homelessness. Social Policy and Administration, 30, 69–85.
36.
ShawI.NortonM. (2008). Kinds and quality of social work research. British Journal of Social Work, 38, 953–970.
ThyerB. A. (in press). The scientific value of qualitative research for social work. Qualitative Social Work.
39.
TurnerM.ZimmermanW. (1994). Acting for the sake of research. In WholeyJ.HatryH.NewcomerK. (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (pp. 310–337). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40.
WasoffF.DobashR. E. (1992). Simulated clients in ‘natural’ settings: Constructing a client to study professional practice. Sociology, 26, 333–349.
41.
WasoffF.DobashR. (1996). The simulated client: A method for studying professionals working with clients. Aldershot, England: Avebury.
42.
WilliamsR. (1976). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. London, England: Fontana.