Objective: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate pretreatment differences between treatment completers and dropouts among a large sample of women ordered into a 26-week batterer intervention program (BIP). Method: The study employed a nonequivalent, control-group design (comparing program completers to dropouts) in a secondary analysis of 485 women mandated into a BIP. Results: Analysis indicated that (a) there are specific psychosocial risk factors associated with an increased probability of program attrition in both women and men batterers; (b) these risk factors increase attrition rates for women in treatment programs; and (c) the level of supervision dictated by the referral source is correlated to program completion for women in this study. Conclusion: These findings reveal characteristics of women batterers as they relate to the likelihood of completing treatment programs.
ButtellF.CarneyM. (2005). Do batterer intervention programs serve African American and Caucasian batterers equally well? An investigation of a 26-week program. Research on Social Work Practice, 15, 19–28.
4.
ButtellF.CarneyM. (2006). A large sample evaluation of a court-mandated batterer intervention program: Investigating differential program effect for African American and Caucasian men. Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 121–131.
5.
CadskyO.HansonR. K.CrawfordM.LalondeC. (1996). Attrition from a male batterer treatment program: Client-treatment congruence and lifestyle instability. Violence and Victims, 11, 51–64.
6.
CampbellD.StanleyJ. (1966). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Houghton Mifflin Company: Boston
7.
CarneyM.ButtellF. (2004). Psychological and demographic predictors of treatment attrition among women assaulters. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 38, 7–25.
8.
CarneyM.ButtellF. (2006). An evaluation of a court-mandated batterer intervention program: Investigating differential program effect for African American and White women. Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 571–581.
9.
CarneyM.ButtellF.DuttonD. (2006). Women who perpetrate intimate partner violence: A review of the literature with recommendations for treatment. Journal of Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 108–115.
10.
CattaneoL.GoodmanL. (2005). Risk factors for reabuse in intimate partner violence: A cross-disciplinary critical review. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 6, 141–175.
11.
ChangH.SaundersD. G. (2002). Predictors of attrition in two types of group programs for men who batter. Journal of Family Violence, 17, 273–292.
12.
Chesney-LindM. (2002). Criminalizing victimization: The unintended consequences of pro-arrest policies for girls and women. Criminology & Public Policy, 2, 81–90.
13.
CoulterM.AlexanderA.HarrisonV. (2005). Specialized domestic violence courts: Improvement for women victims?Women & Criminal Justice, 16, 91–106.
14.
DaltonB. (2001). Batterer characteristics and treatment completion. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 1223–1238.
15.
DalyJ. E.PelowskiS. (2000). Dropout from groups for men who batter: A review of studies with implications for research and practice. Violence and Victims, 15, 137–160.
16.
DalyJ. E.PowerT. G.GondolfE. W. (2001). Predictors of batterer program attendance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 971–991.
17.
DavisR.TaylorB.MaxwellC. (2000). . In Does batterer treatment reduce violence? A randomized experiment in Brooklyn. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
18.
DeHartD.KennerlyR.BurkeL.FollingstadD. (1999). Predictors of attrition in a treatment program for battering men. Journal of Family Violence, 14, 19–34.
19.
DeMarisA. A. (1989). Attrition in batterers’ counseling: The role of social and demographic factors. Social Service Review, March, 42, 143–154.
20.
DuttonD. (1995). A scale for measuring propensity for abusiveness. Journal of Family Violence, 10, 203–221.
21.
DuttonD.LandholtM.StarzonmskiA.BodnarchukM. (2001). Validation of the propensity for abusiveness scale in diverse male populations. Journal of Family Violence, 16, 59–75.
22.
FederL.DuganL. (2002). A test of the efficacy of court-mandated counseling for domestic violence offenders: The Broward experiment. Justice Quarterly, 19, 343–375.
23.
GerlockA. A. (2001). A profile of who completes and who drops out of domestic violence rehabilitation. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 22, 379–400.
24.
GondolfE. (2000). Mandatory court review and batterer program compliance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 428–437.
25.
GoverA. R.BrankE. M.MacDonaldJ. M. (2007). A specialized domestic violence court in South Carolina: An example of procedural justice for victims and defendants. Violence Against Women, 13, 603–626.
26.
GrusznskiR. J.CarrilloT. P. (1988). Who completes batterer’s treatment groups? An empirical investigation. Journal of Family Violence, 3, 141–150.
27.
HambergerL. K.HastingsJ. E. (1989). Counseling male spouse abusers: Characteristics of treatment completers and dropouts. Violence and Victims, 4, 275–286.
28.
HambergerL. K.LohrJ. M.GottliebM. (2000). Predictors of treatment dropout from a spouse abuse abatement program. Behavior Modification, 24, 528–552.
29.
HenningK.FederL. (2004). A comparison between men and women arrested for domestic violence: Who presents the greater threat?Journal of Family Violence, 19, 69–80.
30.
HenningK.RenauerB.HoldfordR. (2006). Victim or offender? Heterogeneity among women arrested for intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 21, 351–368.
31.
HirschelD.BuzawaE. (2002). Understanding the context of dual arrest with directions for future research. Violence Against Women, 8, 1449–1473.
32.
KleinA. R.TobinT. (2008). A longitudinal study of arrested batterers, 1995-2005: Career criminals. Violence against Women, 14, 136–157.
33.
KronerD. G.WeeksJ. R. (1996). Balanced inventory of desirable responding: Factor structure, reliability, and validity with an offender sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 323–333.
MillerW. R.RollnickS. (1995). What is motivational interviewing?Behavioral and Cognitve Psychotherapy, 23, 325–334.
36.
MirchandaniR. (2005). What’s so special about specialized courts? The state and social change in Salt Lake City’s domestic violence court. Law and Society Review, 39, 379–417.
37.
PaulhusD. L. (1984). Two component models of social desirability responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609.
38.
Pirog-GoodM.StetsJ. (1986). Male batterers and battering prevention programs. Response to the Victimization of Women and Children, 8, 8–12.
39.
ProchaskaJ. O.DiClementeC. C.NorcrossJ. C. (1992). In search of how people change. American Psychologist, 47, 1102–1113.
40.
RooneyJ.HansonK. (2001). Predicting attrition from treatment programs for abusive men. Journal of Family Violence, 16, 131–149.
41.
RothmanE. F.GuptaJ.PavlosC.DangQ.CoutinhoP. (2007). Batterer intervention program enrollment and completion among immigrant men in Massachusetts. Violence against Women, 13, 527–543.
42.
SaundersD. G.ParkerJ. C. (1989). Legal sanctions and treatment follow-through among men who batter: A multivariate analysis. Social Work Research Abstracts, September, 25, 21–29.
43.
ScottK. L. (2004). Stage of change as a predictor of attrition among men in a batterer treatment program. Journal of Family Violence, 19, 37–47.
44.
ScottK.KingC.McGinnH.HosseiniN. (2011). Effects of motivational enhancement on immediate outcomes of batterer intervention. Journal of Family Violence, 26, 139–149.
45.
ShermanL.SmithD. (1992). Crime, punishment, and stake in conformity: Legal and informal control of domestic violence. American Sociological Review, 57, 680–690.
46.
StalansL. J.SengM. (2007). Identifying subgroups at high risk of dropping out of domestic batterer treatment: The buffering effects of a high school education. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51, 151–169.
47.
SwanS.SnowD. (2002). A typology of women’s use of violence in intimate relationships. Violence against Women, 8, 286–319.
48.
TaftC. T.MurphyC. M.ElliottJ. D.KeaserM. C. (2001). Race and demographic factors in treatment attendance for domestically abusive men. Journal of Family Violence, 16, 385–400.
