Examinations of social movements have typically overlooked the organizational context of social-movement agencies as well as the role of agency employees in shaping the larger movement. This study explored meso-and micro-level forces that affect the battered women’s movement, as found in one particular women’s shelter. The findings suggest that although the larger social movement may encourage the examination of battering from a systemic perspective, shelter workers adopt a more narrow, psychological interpretation. Shelter workers adopt this perspective because of the socialization that occurs within the shelter context itself, which employees then replicate to be seen as competent.
Brandwein, R., & Filiano, D. (2000). Toward real welfare reform: The voices of battered women. Affilia, 15, 224-243.
2.
Carlson, B. (1992). Questioning the party line on family violence. Affilia, 7, 94-110.
3.
Chornesky, A. (2000). The dynamics of battering revisited. Affilia, 15, 480-501.
4.
Clarke, A.,& Wolfson, A. (1984). Class, race, and reproductive rights. Socialist Review, 78, 110-120.
5.
Davis, L. (1987). Battered women: The transformation of a social problem. Social Work, 32, 306-311.
6.
Frank, P., & Golden, G. K. (1995). Blaming by naming: Battered women and the epidemic of codependency. In M. Babcock & C. McKay (Eds.), Challenging codependency: Feminist critiques(pp. 111-114). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
7.
Fried, A. (1994). “It’s hard to change what we want to change”: Rape crisis centers as organizations. Gender and Society, 8, 562-583.
8.
Glaser, B.,& Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
9.
Hansen, K. (1986). Women’s unions and the search for a political identity. Socialist Review, 86, 67-95.
10.
Kurz, D. (1989). Social science perspectives on wife abuse: Current debates and future directions. Gender and Society, 3, 489-505.
11.
Lorber, J. (2001). Gender inequality: Feminist theories and politics(2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Roxbury.
12.
McKay, C. (1995). Codependency: The pathologizing of female oppression. In M. Babcock & C. McKay (Eds.), Challenging codependency: Feminist critiques(pp. 219-240). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
13.
Michels, R. (1949). Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy(E. Paul & C. Paul, Trans.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press. (Original work published 1915)
14.
Morgan, P. (1981). From battered wife to program client: The state’s shaping of social problems. Kapitalistate, 9, 17-40.
15.
Offe, C. (1990). Reflections on the institutional self-transformation of movement politics: A tentative stage model. In R. Dalton& M. Kuechler (Eds.), Challenging the political order: New social and political movements in Western democracies(pp. 232-250). New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
Pence, E. (1999). Some thoughts on philosophy. InM. Shepard& E. Pence (Eds.), Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: Lessons from Duluth and beyond(pp. 25-40). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Pence, E. (2001). Safety for battered women in a textually mediated legal system. Studies in Cultures, Organizations, and Societies, 7, 199-229.
18.
Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. New York: Springer.
19.
Pence, E.,& Shepard, M. (1988). Integrating feminist theory and practice: The challenge of the battered women’s movement. In K. Yllo & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse(pp. 282-298). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
Perlmutter, F. D. (1994a). Afeminist health organization. In F. D. Perlmutter (Ed.), Women and social change: Nonprofits and social policy(pp. 158-175). Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.
21.
Perlmutter, F. D. (1994b). Women’s alternative organizations. In F.D. Perlmutter (Ed.), Women and social change: Nonprofits and social policy(pp. 3-6). Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.
22.
Piven, F. F.,& Cloward, R. (1977). Poor people’s movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. New York: Vintage Books.
23.
Popkin, A. (1990). The social experience of Bread and Roses: Building acommunity and creating a culture. In K. Hansen & I. Philipson (Eds.), Women, class, and the feminist imagination: A socialist-feminist reader(pp. 182-212). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
24.
Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
Sealander, J., & Smith, D. (1986). The rise and fall of feminist organizations in the 1970s: Dayton as a case study. Feminist Studies, 12, 321-341.
26.
Shepard, M. (1991). Feminist practice principles for social work intervention in wife abuse. Affilia, 6, 87-93.
27.
Shepard, M., & Pence, E. (Eds.). (1999). Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: Lessons from Duluth and beyond. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
Smith, D. (1990). The conceptual practices of power. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
29.
Smith, D. (2001). Texts and the ontology of organizations and institutions. Studies in Cultures, Organizations, and Societies, 7, 159-198.
30.
Srinivasan, M.,& Davis, L. V. (1991). Ashelter: Anorganization like any other?Affilia, 6, 38-57.
31.
Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Tice, K. (1990). A case study of battered women’s shelters in Appalachia. Affilia, 5, 83-100.
33.
Walker, G. (1990). Family violence and the women’s movement: The conceptual politics of struggle. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
34.
Weber, M. (1946). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology(H. H. Gerth& C. W. Mills, Trans.). New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
Whelan, M. (1996). Counseling to end violence against women: A subversive model. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
Wood, G. G.,& Middleman, R. R. (1992). Groups to empowerbatteredwomen. Affilia, 7, 82-95.
