Objective: Approved versions of the SF-36 Version 1.0 are used for limited-English-speaking individuals whose primary languages are Korean, Chinese, and Spanish to test the respective translations for use among immigrants to the United States. Method: Surveys are completed by an older adult and a nominated adult family caregiver (N = 132). Results: Adequate internal consistency and validity are found for Chinese and Spanish with the exception of the Social Functioning (Spanish) and Vitality (Chinese) Scales. The Korean version has reliability and validity issues. Comparisons are made with English language norms and studies that use translations in Spanish and Chinese. No comparative data for Korean Americans are found. Recommendations are made for reading reports of and using SF-36 translations. Conclusion: Paying attention to options in use of translations of the SF-36 in Chinese and Spanish improves the relevance of findings to research and practice.
Andresen, E.M., Gravitt, G.W., Aydelotte, M.E., & Podgorski, C.A. (1999). Limitations of the SF-36 in a sample of nursing home residents. Age andAgeing, 28, 562-566.
2.
Arocho, R., & McMillan, C. (1998). Discriminant and criterion validation of the US-Spanish version of the SF-36 Health Survey in a Cuban-American population with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Medical Care, 36, 766-772.
3.
Azen, S.P., Palmer, J.M., Carlson, M., Mandel, D., Cherry, B., Fanchiang, S., et al. (1999). Psychometric properties of a Chinese translation of the SF-36 health survey questionnaire in the well elderly study. Journal of Aging and Health, 11, 240-251.
4.
Berkman, B., Chauncey, S., Holmes, W., Daniels, A., Bonander, E., Sampson, S., et al. (1999). Standardized screening of elderly patients' needs for social work assessment in primary care: Use of the SF-36. Health &Social Work, 24, 9-16.
5.
Berkman, B., & Maramaldi, P. (2001). Use of standardized measures in agency based research and practice. Social Work in Health Care, 34, 115-129.
6.
Chang, D.F., Chun, C., Takeuchi, D.T., & Shen, H. (2000). SF-36 health survey: Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions and reliability in a community sample of Chinese Americans. Medical Care, 38, 542-548.
7.
Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics. (2000). Older Americans 2000: Key indicators of well-being . Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved February 8, 2007, from http://www.aoa.gov/agingstats/chartbook2000
8.
Hayes, V., Morris, J., Wolfe, C., & Morgan, M. (1995). The SF-36 survey questionnaire: Is it suitable for use with older adults? Age andAgeing, 2, 120-125.
9.
Idler, E.L., Russell, L.B., & Davis, D. (2000). Survival, functional limitations, and self rated health in the NHANES epidemiologic follow-up study, 1992. American Journal of Epidemiology, 15, 874-883.
10.
Irvine, D., O'Brien-Pallas, L.L., Murray, M., Cockerill, R., Sidani, S., Laurie-Shaw, B., et al. (2000). The reliability and validity of two health status measures for evaluating outcomes of home care nursing. Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 43-54.
11.
Johnson, K.W., Anderson, N.B., Bastida, E., Kramer, B.J., Williams, D., & Wong, M. (1995). Panel II: Macrosocial and environmental influences on minority health. American Psychologist, 14, 601-612.
12.
Jordan-Marsh, M. (2002). The SF-36 quality of life instrument: Updates and strategies for critical care research. Critical Care Nurse , 22, 35-43.
13.
Kanagawa, C., Cross, S.E., & Markus, H.R. (2001). “Who am I?” The cultural psychology of the conceptual self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 90-103.
14.
Kosinski, M., Bayliss, M., Bjorner, J.B., & Ware, J. (2000, Fall). Improving estimates of SF-36 Health Survey scores for respondents with missing data. Monitor, 8-10.
15.
Kovar, M.G., Fitti, J.E., & Chyba, M.M. (1992). The Longitudinal Study of Aging: 1984-1990. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics .
16.
Kuo, Y.F., Raji, M.A., Peek, M.K., & Goodwin, J.S. (2004). Health-related social disengagement in elderly diabetic patients. Diabetes Care, 27, 1630-1637.
17.
Mancuso, C.A., Peterson, M.G., & Charlson, M.E. (2001). Comparing discriminative validity between a disease-specific and a general health scale in patients with moderate asthma. Journal ofClinical Epidemiology, 54, 263-274.
18.
Maramaldi, P., Berkman, B., & Barusch, A. (2005). Assessment and the ubiquity of culture: Threats to validity in the measures of health-related quality of life. Health and Social Work, 30(1), 27-38. Retrieved April 21, 2006, from PsycINFO, http://www.apa.org/psycinfo/
19.
Marín, G., Sabogal, F., Van Oss-Marín, B., Otero-Sabogal, F., & Perez-Stable, E. J. (1987). Development of a short acculturation scale for Hispanics. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 9, 183-205.
20.
McHorney, C.A. (1996). Measuring and monitoring general health status in elderly persons: Practical and methodological issues in using the SF-36 Health Survey. The Gerontologist, 36, 571-583.
21.
Medline. (2007). Search Medline . Retrieved February 9, 2007, from http://medline.cos.com
22.
Mundinger, M.O., Kane, R.L., Lenz, E.R., Totten, A.M., Tsai, W.Y., Cleary, P.D., et al. (2000). Primary care outcomes in patients treated by nurse practitioners or physicians: A randomized trial. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 59-68.
23.
Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
24.
Pang, E., Jordan-Marsh, M., Silverstein, M., & Cody, M. (2004). Health-seeking behaviors of elderly Chinese Americans: Shifts in expectations. The Gerontologist, 43, 864-874.
25.
Peek, M.K., Ray, L., Patel, K., Stoebner-May, D., & Ottenbacher, K.J. (2004). The reliability and validity of the SF-36 among older Mexican Americans. The Gerontologist , 44, 418-425.
26.
Pourat, N., Lubben, H., Yu, H., & Wallace, S. (2000). Perceptions of health and use of ambulatory care: Differences between Korean and White elderly. Journal of Aging and Health, 12, 112-134.
27.
QualityMetric. (1999-2007). AmIHealthy.com. Retrieved February 9, 2007, from http://www.amihealthy.com
28.
QualityMetric. (2005). QualityMetric health outcomes solutions. Retrieved February 9, 2007, from http://www.qualitymetric.com
29.
QualityMetric. (n.d.-a). SF-36.org: A community for measuring health outcomes using SF tools. Retrieved February 9, 2007, from http://www.sf-36.org
30.
QualityMetric. (n.d.-b). SF-36® PCS, MCS and NBS calculator. Retrieved February 9, 2007, from http://www.sf-36.org
31.
Ren, X.S., Amick, B., Zhou, L., & Gandek, B. (1998). Translation and psychometric evaluation of a Chinese version of the SF-36 health survey in the United States. Journal ofClinical Epidemiology, 51, 1129-1138.
32.
Ren, X.S., & Chang, K. (1998). Evaluating health status of elderly Chinese in Boston. Journal ofClinical Epidemiology, 51, 429-435.
33.
Treas, J., & Mazumdar, S. (2002). Older people in America's immigrant families: Dilemmas of dependence, integration, and isolation. Journal of Aging Studies, 16, 243-258.
34.
Ware, J.E., Jr. (2000). SF-36 Health Survey update. Spine , 25, 3130-3139.
35.
Ware, J.E., Jr. (2003). Conceptualization and measurement of health-related quality of life: Comments on an evolving field. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(Suppl. 2), S43-S51.
36.
Ware, J.E., Jr. (2004, July). SF-36 Health Survey update. In M. Marusih (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment (3rd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 693-718). Retrieved June 2, 2006, from http://www.sf-36.org/announcements/Updated_SF36_bookChapter_Sept04.pdf
37.
Ware, J.E., Jr., & Gandek, B. (1998). Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: The IQOLA Project Approach. International Quality of Life Assessment issue. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 945-952.
38.
Ware, J.E., Jr., Kosinski, M., & Dewey, J. (2001). SF-36V2® manual and interpretation guide (2nd ed.). Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric.
39.
Ware, J.E., Jr., Kosinski, M.A., & Keller, S.D. (1994). SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: A user's manual. Boston: Health Institute, New England Medical Center.
40.
Ware, J.E., Jr., & Sherbourne, C.D. (1992). The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473-483.
