Objective: To empirically examine whether the educational background of child welfare workers in Florida impacts on performance evaluations of their work. Method: A proportionate, stratified random sample of supervisor and peer evaluations of child protective investigators and child protective service workers is conducted. ANOVA procedures are used to test if performance scores on a multitude of items differ for workers with university degrees in social work, psychology, sociology, criminology, education, business, and other fields. Results: The ratings of social workers' skills and competency do not statistically differ from those workers with other educational backgrounds on 20 measures of performance. Conclusion: Findings suggest that the educational background of child welfare workers is a poor predictive variable of their performance as evaluated by supervisors and peers. However, more research is needed to determine if performance evaluations of workers are positively correlated with successful service outcomes with clients.
Bernotavicz, F., & Locke, A. (2000). Hiring child welfare caseworkers: Using a competency-based approach. Public Personnel Management29(1), 33-41.
2.
Booz-Allen & Hamilton (1987). The Maryland social work services job analysis and personnel qualifications study. Baltimore: Maryland Department of Human Resources.
3.
Briar, K., Hansen, V., & Harris, N. (Eds.). (1992). New partnerships: Proceedings from the National Public Child Welfare Symposium. Miami: Florida International University Press.
4.
Briar-Lawson, K., & Wiesen, M. (1999). Effective partnership models between the state agencies, the university, and community service providers. In 1999 Child Welfare Training Symposium: Changing paradigms of child welfare practice: Responding to opportunities and challenges (pp. 73-86). Washington, DC: U.S. Children's Bureau.
5.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1962). Salaries and working conditions of social welfare manpower in 1960. New York: National Social Welfare Assembly.
6.
Bush, J. (2002). Exec. Order No. 02-159. Retrieved February 28, 2005, from http://sun6.dms.state.fl.us/eog_new/eog/orders/2002/may/eo2002-159-05-28-02.html
7.
Child Welfare League of America. (1982). Child welfare as a field of social work practice. New York: Author.
8.
Child Welfare League of America (CWLA). (1991). A blueprint for fostering infants, children, and youths in the 1990s. Washington, DC: Author.
9.
Clark, E. J. (2003). Written testimony of Elizabeth J. Clark, executive director, National Association of Social Workers For the Human Resources Subcommittee, U.S. Committee on Ways and Means. Retrieved January 5, 2005, from https://www.socialworkers.org/advocacy/issues/child_welfare.asp
10.
Clark, S. (2003). The California collaboration: A competency-based child welfare curriculum project for master's social workers. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment7(1/2), 135-157.
11.
Dhooper, S. S., Royse, D. D., & Wolfe, L. C. (1990). Does social work education make a difference?Social Work35, 57-61.
12.
Fox, S., Miller, V., & Barbee, A. P. (2003). Finding and keeping child welfare workers: Effective use of training and professional development. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment7(1/2), 67-82.
13.
Fox, S. R., Burnham, D., Barbee, A. P., & Yankeelov, P. A. (2000). School to work—social work that is: Maximizing agency/ university partnerships in preparing child welfare workers. Journal of the National Staff Development and Training Association1(1), 13-20.
14.
Gansle, K., & Ellett, A. (2002). Child welfare knowledge transmission, practitioner retention, and university-community impact: A study of Title IV-E child welfare training. Journal of Health and Social Policy15(3/4), 69-88.
15.
Grossman, B., Laughlin, S., & Specht, H. (1992). Building the commitment of social work education to publicly sponsored social services: The California model. In K. Briar, V. Hansen, & N. Harris (Eds.), New partnerships: Proceedings from the National Public Welfare Training Symposium 1991 (pp. 55-72). Miami: Florida International University Press.
16.
Hopkins, K. M., Mudrick, N. R., & Rudolph, C. S. (1999). Impact of university-agency partnerships in child welfare on organizations, workers, and work activities. Child Welfare78(6), 749-773.
17.
Hughes, R. C., & Rycus, J. S. (1989). Target: Competent staff, competency-based inservice training for child welfare. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
18.
Jones, L. P., & Okamura, A. (2000). Reprofessionalizing child welfare services: An evaluation of a Title IV-E training program. Research on Social Work Practice10, 607-621.
19.
Leighninger, L., & Ellett, A. (1998, March). Re-professionalism in child welfare: historical analysis and implications for social work education. Paper presented at the Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, Orlando, FL.
20.
Lewandowski, C. A. (1998). Retention outcomes of a public child welfare long-term training program. Professional Development: International Journal of Continuing Social Work Education1, 38-46.
21.
Liederman, D. (1995). Child welfare overview. In R. L. Edwards & J. G. Hopps (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social work (19th ed., pp. 424-433). Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.
22.
McDonald, J., & McCarthy, B. (1999). Effective partnership models between the state agencies, community, the university and community service providers. In 1999 Child Welfare Training Symposium: Changing paradigms of child welfare practice: Responding to opportunities and challenges (pp. 43-72). Washington, DC: U.S. Children's Bureau.
23.
National Association of Public Child Welfare Administrators. (1987). Guidelines for a model system of protective services for abused and neglected children and their families. Washington, DC: American Public Welfare Association.
24.
National Association of Public Child Welfare Administrators. (1991). Public child welfare agencies and schools of social work: The current status of collaboration. Washington, DC: American Public Welfare Association.
25.
National Association of Social Workers. (2004a). The case for retaining the Title IV-E child welfare training program. Retrieved March 1, 2005, from https://www.socialworkers.org/advocacy/updates/2003/081204b.asp
26.
National Association of Social Workers. (2004b). Fact Sheet: Title IV E Child Welfare Training Program. Retrieved January 20, 2005, from http://www.socialworkers.org/advocacy/updates/2003/081204a.asp
27.
Olsen, L., & Holmes, W. (1982). Educating child welfare workers: The effects of professional training on service delivery. Journal of Education for Social Work18(1), 94-102.
28.
Pecora, P., Briar, K., & Zlotnik, J. (1989). Addressing the program and personnel crisis in child welfare: A social work response. Silver Springs, MD: National Association of Social Workers.
29.
Perry, R. (2004). Factors influencing MSW students'interest in public child welfare. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment10, 1-31.
30.
Risley-Curtiss, C. (2003). Current challenges and future directions for collaborative child welfare educational programs. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment7, 207-226.
31.
Russell, M., & Hornby, H. (1987). 1987 national study of public child welfare job requirements. Portland: University of Southern Maine, National Child Welfare Resource Center for Management and Administration.
32.
Scannapieco, M., & Connell-Carrick, K. (2003). Do collaborations with schools of social work make a difference for the field of child welfare? Practice, retention, and curriculum. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment7, 35-51.
33.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (2003, March). HHS could play a greater role in helping child welfare agencies recruit and retain staff (GAO-03-357). Washington, DC: Author.
34.
Vinokur-Kaplan, D. (1987). Where did they go? A national follow-up of child welfare trainees. Child Welfare66, 411-421.
35.
Vinokur-Kaplan, D., & Hartman, A. (1986). A national profile of child welfare workers and supervisors. Child Welfare65, 323-335.
36.
Zlotnik, J. (2002). Preparing social workers for child welfare practice: Lessons from an historical review of the literature. Journal of Health and Social Policy15, 5-21.
37.
Zlotnik, J. (2003). The use of Title IV-E training funds for social work education: An historical perspective. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment7, 5-20.
38.
Zlotnik, J. (1993). Social work education and public human services: Developing partnerships. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
