This article explores the impact of the working definition of social work practice first articulated almost one half century ago. Its influence on both beginning and advanced levels of practice is considered. This consideration is examined in the contexts of social work education and professional identity. The authors conclude that the working definition has assisted in the development of clear and consistent theory underpinning generalist social work practice. On the other hand, the authors conclude that it has weakened social work's professional identity, thus reducing social work practice effectiveness in the Canadian environment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bartlett, H. M. (1958). Toward clarification and improvement of social work practice. Social Work, 3(2), 3-9.
2.
Bartlett, H. M. (1961). Analyzing social work practice by fields. New York: National Association of Social Workers.
3.
Canadian Association of Schools of Social Work. (1999). Board of accreditation manual. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Author.
4.
Canadian Association of Schools of Social Work. (2000). Directory 2000. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Author.
5.
Canadian Association of Social Workers, Canadian Association of Schools of Social Work, Canadian Committee of Deans & Directors of Schools of Social Work, Regroupment des unites de formation universitaire en travail social. (2000). Social work in Canada: National occupational study. Canadian Association of Social Workers Bulletin, 2(2), 43.
6.
Drover, G. (1998). Social work our roots, our future. The Social Worker, 66(3), 80-91.
7.
Flexner, A. (1915, May 12-19). Is social work a profession? Proceedings of the National Conference of Charities and Corrections at the 42nd annual session held in Baltimore, MD. Chicago: Hildmann.
8.
Foley, J. (1999). Professional associations in Canada. In F. J. Turner (Ed.), Social work practice: A Canadian perspective (pp. 477-491). Scarborough, Ontario, Canada: Prentice Hall.
9.
Gordon, W. E. (1962). A critique of the working definition. Social Work, 7(4), 3-13.
10.
Hasenfeld, Y. (1983). Human service organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11.
Holosko, M. J. (in press). Evidence-based practice in Canada. In B. A. Thyer & M. Kazi (Eds.), International perspectives on evidence-based practice in social work. London: Venture.
12.
Holosko, M. J., & Leslie, D. L. (1998). Obstacles to conducting empirically based practice. In J. S. Wodarski & B. A. Thyer (Eds.), Handbook of empirical social work practice: Social problems and practice issues (vol. 2, pp. 433-452). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: John Wiley.
13.
Holosko, M. J., & Leslie, D. L. (2001). Is social work a profession? The Canadian response. Social Work Practice, 11(2), 201-209.
14.
Johnson, L. C., McClelland, R. W., & Austin, C. D. (1998). Social work practice: A generalist approach. Scarborough, On, Canada: Prentice Hall.
15.
Landon, P. S. (1995). Generalist and advanced generalist practice. In R. L. Edwards (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social work (19th ed., pp. 1101-1108). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
16.
Locke, B., Garrison, R., & Winship, J. (1998). Generalist social work practice: Context, story, and partnerships. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
17.
MacKenzie, M. (1999). Historical overview and current issues in social work regulation. In F. J. Turner (Ed.), Social work practice: A Canadian perspective (pp. 492-504). Scarborough, Ontario, Canada: Prentice Hall.
18.
Miley, K. K., O”Melia, M., & Dubois, B. (1998). Generalist social work practice: An empowering approach (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
19.
O'Neil McMahon, M. (1996). The general method of social work practice: A generalist perspective (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
20.
Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services. (2000). Implementation guidelines: Early intervention program for child witnesses of woman abuse. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Author.
21.
Pinderhughes, E. (1995). Direct practice overview. In R. L. Edwards (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social work (19th ed., pp. 740-751). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
22.
Skidmore, R. A. (1995). Social work administration: Dynamic management and human relationships (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
23.
Specht, H. (1988). New directions for social work practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24.
Thyer, B. A. (2002). Developing discipline specific knowledge for social work: Is it possible? Journal of Social Work Education, 38, 101-113.
