School Attendance Demonstration Project: An Evaluation of a Program to Motivate Public Assistance Teens to Attend and Complete School in an Urban School District

Abstract

Objective: This article reports on the evaluation of The School Attendance Demonstration Project (SADP). SADP is an intervention aimed at improving the school attendance rates of 16- to 18-year-olds receiving public assistance. Method: Experimental group students attending school less than 80% of the time received a notice to attend an orientation for services. Students who continued to attend school less than 80%, did not attend the orientation, and could not show good cause for attendance were sanctioned. The study used a control group with random assignment. Results: Data show that in any month, more experimental group students met the attendance rule than did control group students. Logistic regression predicted that females, Hispanics, students from single-parent families, and those attending alternative schools had difficulty meeting attendance requirements. Conclusions: The findings suggest that at-risk teens need alternative strategies from sanctions to encourage school attendance.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bols, J. , & Fellerath, V. (1997). Final report on Ohio’s welfare initiative to improve school attendance among teenage parents. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.

Brooks-Gunn, J. , Guo, G. , & Furstenberg, F. (1993). Factors predicting truancy among adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 3, 271-294.

Etheridge, M. , & Percy, S. (1993). A new kind of public policy encounters disappointing results implementing Learnfare in Wisconsin. Public Administration Review, 55, 340-347.

Jones, L. , & Finnegan, D. (1999, January 15). The final report of the process study of the School Attendance Demonstration Project. San Diego, CA: School of Social Work, San Diego State University.

Maynard, R. (1993). Building self-sufficiency among welfare-dependent teenage parents. Mathematica: Policy Research Inc.

Mead, L. (1998). Telling the poor what to do. The Public Interest, 112(3), 97-106.

Mishel, L. , & Bernstein, J. (1991). A lesson in wages. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.

Pawasarat, J. , & Quinn, L. (March, 1990). The impact of Learnfare on Milwaukee county social service clients. Milwaukee: Employment and Training Institute, University of Milwaukee-Wisconsin.

Reich, R. (1991). The work of nations. New York: Albert Knopf.

10.

Stafford, F. (1986). Women’s work, sibling competition, and children’s school performance. American Economic Review, 77, 972-980.

11.

U.S. Census Bureau (2001). Income 2001. Retrieved from the World Wide Web.

12.

U.S. Department of Labor (2001, December7). The employment situation in November 2001.News, United States Department of Labor. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1-5.

13.

Zill, N. (1991). The life circumstances and development of children in welfare families: A profile based on national survey data. Washington, DC: Child Trends Incorporated.