Objective: Two studies evaluated the validity and reliability of the Daily Living Activities Scale (DLA), a 20-item functional assessment measure for adults with severe mental disorders. Method: The first study evaluated the internal consistency and interrater reliability of the DLA scoring for 85 clients with severe mental disorders currently receiving services from one of five different treatment programs. In the second study, symptomatology and functional assessment data were collected for 886 clients at time of admission to three different levels of care in community treatment and support services and at the time of 6-month progress reviews. Results: Internal consistency and interrater reliability were adequate. Criterion-related validity was evidenced by the ability of DLA scores to differentiate consumers in different levels of care and by diagnostic categories. Conclusions: Study findings provide evidence of the usefulness of the DLA to support the functional assessment data needs of service providers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, D., Nelson, R., & Todd, P. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16, 227-247.
2.
Allen, M., & Yen, W. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
4.
Bartko, J. (1976). On various infraclass correlation reliability coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 762-765.
5.
Bartko, J. (1991). Measurement and reliability: Statistical thinking considerations. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 17, 483-489.
6.
Blythe, B., & Tripodi, T. (1989). Measurement in direct practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
Bostwick, G., & Kyte, N. (1985). Validity and reliability. In R. Grinnell, Jr. (Ed.). Social work research and evaluation (2nd ed.). Itasca, IL: Peacock.
8.
Brekke, J. (1992). An examination of the relationships among three outcome scales in schizophrenia. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 180, 162-167.
9.
Cho, D. (1981). Inter-rater reliability: Intraclass correlation coefficients. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 223-226.
10.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
12.
Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
13.
Dickerson, F. (1997). Assessing clinical outcomes: The community functioning of persons with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 48, 897-902.
14.
Eisen, S., Dill, D., & Grob, M. (1994). Reliability and validity of a brief patient-report instrument for psychiatric outcome and evaluation. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 45, 242-247.
15.
Endicott, J., Spitzer, R., Fleiss, J., et al. (1976). The Global Assessment Scale: A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, 766-771.
16.
Evenson, R., & Boyd, M. (1993). The St. Louis Inventory of Community Living Skills. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 17, 93-99.
17.
Fitz, D., & Evenson, R. (1995). A validity study of the St. Louis Inventory of Community Living Skills. Community Mental Health Journal, 31, 369-377.
18.
Fleiss, J. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley.
19.
Goodman, S., Sewell, D., Cooley, E., & Leavitt, N. (1993). Assessing levels of adaptive functioning: The Role Functioning Scale. Community Mental Health Journal, 29, 119-131.
20.
Green, R., & Gracely, E. (1987). Selecting a rating scale for evaluating services to the chronically mentally ill. Community Mental Health Journal, 23, 91-102.
21.
Green, R., & Jerrell, J. (1994). The generalizability of brief ratings of psychosocial functioning. Evaluation and Program Planning, 17, 141-151.
22.
Hendrickson, A., Patti, D., & Cronan, T. (1993). On the test-retest reliability of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use Scales. MIS Quarterly, 17, 227-230.
23.
Kramer, H., Massey, O., & Pokorny, L. (1990). Development and validation of a level-of-care instrument for predicting residential placement. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 41, 790-794.
24.
Lehman, A. (1988). A quality of life interview for the chronically mentally ill. Evaluation and Program Planning, 11, 51-62.
25.
McPheeters, H. (1984). Statewide mental health outcome evaluation: A perspective of two southern states. Community Mental Health Journal, 20, 44-55.
26.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). (1991). Caring for people with severe mental disorders: A national plan of research to improve services (DHHS Publication No. [ADM] 91-1762). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents.
27.
Nurius, P., & Hudson, W. (1993). Human services practice, evaluation, and computers. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
28.
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29.
Overall, J., & Gorham, D. (1962). The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychological Reports, 10, 799-812.
30.
Pokorny, L. (1991). A summary measure of client level of functioning: Progress and challenges for use within mental health agencies. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 18, 80-87.
31.
Polk, G. (1997). Development and testing of an automated treatment planning system for clinicians in mental health. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
32.
Presmanes, W., & Bent, R. (1978). The Georgia Role Functioning Scale. Unpublished manuscript.
33.
Presmanes, W., & Polk, G. (1997, November). Development and testing of an outcome-oriented treatment planning system for persistently and severely mentally ill consumers of behavioral health services. Paper presented at the International Congress on Performance Measurement & Improvement in Health Care, Joint Commission of Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations and International Society for Quality in Health Care, Chicago, Illinois.
34.
Rosenblatt, A., & Attkisson, C. (1993). Assessing outcomes for sufferers of severe mental disorder: A conceptual framework and review. Evaluation and Program Planning, 16, 347-363.
35.
Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (1993). Research methods for social work. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
36.
Scheffe, H. (1953). A method for judging all contrasts in the analysis of variance. Biometrika, 40, 87-104.
37.
Sherman, P., & Gomez, M. (1982, July). Quality assurance uses of level of functioning ratings. Quality Review Bulletin, pp. 22-30.
38.
Szajna, B. (1994). Predictive validation of the technology acceptance instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18, 319-324.
39.
Vacarro, J., Pitts, D., & Wallace, C. (1992). Functional assessment. In R. Liberman (Ed.), Handbook of psychiatric rehabilitation. New York: McMillan.
