Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

This study examined the impact of two distance education programs on clients, field instructors, cooperating agencies, and the broader networks of agencies surrounding the two distance sites.

Method

Self-administered surveys were mailed to one cohort of students as well as to field instructors and agency directors from two successive field placement sites.

Results

A11 groups of respondents reported Impact of increased services to clients, new knowledge of interventions available, and increased networking among students, field instructors, and agencies. There was a limited amount of information about technology transferred to the agencies. No significant differences were found in results between the sites.

Conclusions

The amount and quality of services, and to a lesser extent the choices of interventions and programs, were seen by these key stakeholders as having increased in the two distant communities where the master's of social work program was offered.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Council on Social Work Education. (1995). Guidelines for distance education proposals in social work. Alexandria, VA: Author.

Freddolino

, Reed

, & Ruhala

(1985). Impact of social work education upon networking among community agencies. Journal of Social Work Education, 3(3), 18–23.

Mawby

R. G.

(1996). The challenge for outreach for land grant universities as they move into the 21st century. Journal of Public Service and Outreach, 1(1), 46–56.

Rabin

, Savaya

, & Frank

(1994). A joint university-field agency: Toward the integration of classroom and practicum. Journal of Social Work Education, 30, 107–115.

Ruffolo

M. C.

, & Miller

(1994). An advocacy/empowerment model of organizing: Developing university-agency partnerships. Journal of Social Work Education, 30, 310–316.