Comparing Online and In-Person Delivery Formats of the OSHA 10-Hour General Industry Health and Safety Training for Young Workers

Abstract

Seven school districts or comprehensive high schools were enrolled in online OSHA 10-hour General Industry or Construction health and safety training via CareerSafe to determine the feasibility of online training for students, given limited resources for in-person trainings. A two-campus school district was analyzed comparing OSHA 10 for General Industry across in-person, supervisor-level teachers as authorized trainers, and online course formats. The online training courses were completed by 86 of 91 students, while another 53 of 57 students completed in-person training. Both groups completed identical OSHA-approved quizzes for “Introduction to OSHA,” the initial 2-h module consistently provided in OSHA 10 courses across topics and formats. Results indicated teacher supervision was critical, and girls had higher online course completion rates, overall quiz scores, and never failed. Though both cohorts passed, in-person had significantly higher scores than online; both struggled with two questions. Online OSHA 10 for General Industry can be an efficient learning tool for students when limited resources prevent widespread availability of in-person courses.

Keywords

adolescents injury prevention occupational safety and health online training young workers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

USDOL-OSHA. Online OSHA training, www.osha.com/courses/10-hour-general.html (accessed July 2015).

CareerSafe. OSHA 10-hour General Industry, www.careersafeonline.com/index.php/component/content/article/2-uncategorised/187-osha-10-hour-training (accessed January 2017).

State of New Jersey, Department of Education (NJDOE). Data & reports, http://www.state.nj.us/education/data/ (1996–2010, accessed August 2015).

Sawacha

Naoum

Fong

. Factors affecting safety performance on construction sites. Int J Proj Manag 1999; 17: 309–315.

U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health. Youth@Work talking safety curriculum, www.cdc.gov/niosh/talkingsafety/ (2015, accessed August 2015).

United States Department of Labor-Occupational Safety and Health Administration (USDOL-OSHA), OSHA Directorate of Training and Education. Introduction to OSHA. Instructor guide, www.osha.gov/dte/outreach/intro_osha/intro_to_osha_guide.html (2013, accessed August 2015).

Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University. What we know about online course outcomes, www.achievingthedream.org/sites/default/files/resources/Online-Learning-Practitioner-Packet.pdf (2013, accessed 17 February 2017).

U.S. Department of Education. Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning. www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf (2010, accessed August 2015).

Strother J. An assessment of the effectiveness of e-learning in Corporate Training Programs. Int Rev Res Open Distribut Learn 2002; 3, http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/83/161 (accessed 4 August 2015).

10.

Hauck

. Online versus traditional face-to-face learning in a large introductory course. J Fam Consum Sci 2006; 98: 27–29.

11.

Wegner

Holloway

Garton

. The effects of Internet-based instruction on student learning. J Async Learn Network 1999; 3: 98–106.

12.

Maki

Patterson

. Evaluation of a web-based introductory psychology course: I. Learning and satisfaction in on-line versus lecture courses. Behav Res Meth Instrum Comput 2000; 32: 230–239.

13.

Navarro

. Economics in cyberspace: a comparison study. J Dist Educ 2000; 14: 119–132.

14.

Nelson G. “Do no Harm” A first measure of effectiveness in small distance education programs. In: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2001; 1398–1399.

15.

Redding TR and Rotzien J. Comparative analysis of SDL online training with traditional classroom instruction. In: 14th International Symposium on Self-Directed Learning, 1999; 1–4.

16.

Shendell

Hemminger

Campbell

. Supervising structured learning experiences for students in New Jersey: training teachers in school-based occupational health and safety practice. Publ Health Rep 2009; 124(Suppl 1): 74–82.

17.

Aragon

Johnson

Shaik

. The influence of learning style preferences on student success in online versus face-to-face environments. Am J Dist Educ 2002; 16: 227–244.

18.

Bandura

. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977; 84: 191–215.

19.

Holcomb

King

Brown

. Student traits and attributes contributing to success in online courses: evaluation of university online courses. J Interact Online Learn 2004; 2(3).

20.

Lim

. Computer self-efficacy, academic self-concept, and other predictors of satisfaction and future participation of adult distance learners. Am J Dist Educ 2001; 15: 41–51.