Objective scoring, comprehensiveness, flexibility, and ease of administration are characteristics of computerized top-management gaming simulations (CTMGS) that suit them for the assessment of management education. These characteristics may be substantially enhanced by the inclusion of real markets. Support for real markets can be supplied by microcomputer local-area networks (LAN) and LAN-cognizant software. Additional advantages of real markets include relief to problems of team forming, decision cycling, hand-holding, end gaming, assignment evaluating, and debriefing. Three gaming simulations that incorporate real markets have been used in undergraduate courses. A great variety is possible in CTMGSs with real markets. The scores of CTMGSs with real markets are valid to the extent the markets appropriately reward business competencies.
AACSB-International Association for Management Education
(Producer). (1997, April 24). Program assessment: Strategies and practices for achieving teaching and learning outcomes [Interactive videoconference]. (Available from AACSB, Subscription Office, 600 Emerson Rd., Suite 300, St. Louis, MO 63141-6762)
2.
Anderson, P. H.
, & Lawton, L. (1992). A survey and methods used for evaluating student performance on business simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 23, 490-498.
3.
Astin, A. W.
, Banta, T. W., Cross, K. P., El-Khawas, E., Ewell, P. T., Hutchings, P., Marchese, T. J., McClenney, K. M., Mentkowski, M., Miller, M. A., Moran, E. T., & Wright, B. D. (1992). Principles of good practice for assessing student learning. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
4.
Boyer, E. L.
(1990). Scholarship reconsidered. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation.
5.
Braskamp, L. A.
, & Ory, J. C. (1997). Assessing faculty work: Enhancing individual and institutional performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Crookall, D.
(1992). Editorial: Debriefing. Simulation & Gaming, 23, 141-142.
7.
Education Commission of the States
. (1991). Assessing college outcomes: what state leaders need to know. Denver, CO: Author.
8.
Elman, S. E.
, & Lynton, E. A. (1985). Assessment in career-oriented education. In C. Adelman (Ed.), Assessment in American higher education: Issues and context (pp. 63-72). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
9.
Faria, A. J.
(1987). A survey of the use of business games in academia and business. Simulation & Games, 18, 207-224.
10.
Faria, A. J.
(1990). Business simulation games after thirty years: Current usage levels in the United States. In J. W. Gentry (Ed.), Guide to business gaming and experiential learning (pp. 36-47). East Brunswick, NJ: Nichols/GP.
11.
Frand, J. L.
, Britt, J. A., & Ng, A. (1993). Tenth annual UCLA survey of business school computer usage: A global perspective. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, John E. Anderson Graduate School of Management.
12.
Fritzsche, D. J.
, & Cotter, R. V. (1990). Guidelines for administering business games. In J. W. Gentry (Ed.), Guide to business gaming and experiential learning (pp. 74-89). East Brunswick, NJ: Nichols/GP.
13.
Gold, S. C.
, & Pray, T. F (1983). Simulating market and firm level demand-a robust demand system. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning, 10, 101-106.
14.
Gold, S. C.
, & Pray, T. F. (1984). Modeling non-price factors in the demand function of computerized business simulations. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning, 11, 240-243.
15.
Goosen, K. R.
(1981). A generalized algorithm for designing and developing business simulations. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning, 8, 41-47.
16.
Hartle, T. W.
(1985). The growing interest in measuring the educational achievement of college students. In C. Adelman (Ed.), Assessment in American higher education: Issues and context (pp. 1-11). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
17.
House, W. C.
, & Napier, H. S. (1988). A comparative study of strategic performance factors in actual and simulated business environments. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning, 15, 50-55.
18.
Keeffe, M. J.
, Dyson, D. A., & Edwards, R. R. (1993). Strategic management simulations: A current assessment. Simulation & Gaming, 24, 363-368.
19.
Keys, B.
(1987). Total enterprise business games. Simulation & Games, 18, 225-241.
20.
Keys, B.
, & Biggs, W. D. (1990). A review of business games. In J. W. Gentry (Ed.), Guide to business gaming and experiential learning (pp. 48-73). East Brunswick, NJ: Nichols/GP.
21.
Keys, B.
, & Wolfe, J. (1990). The role of management games and simulations in education and research. Journal of Management, 16, 307-336.
22.
Lederman, L. C.
(1992). Debriefing: Towards a systematic assessment of theory and practice. Simulation & Gaming, 23, 145-160.
23.
Neuhauser, J. J.
(1976). Business games have failed. Academy of Management Review, 1, 124-129.
24.
Pray, T. F.
, & Gold, S. C. (1982). Inside the black box: An analysis of underlying demand functions in contemporary business simulations. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning, 9, 110-115.
25.
Pray, T. F.
, & Gold, S. C. (1984). Two algorithms for distribution of stockouts in computerized business simulations. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning, 11, 247-252.
26.
Rollier, B.
(1992). Observations of a corporate facilitator. Simulation & Gaming, 23, 442-456.
27.
Smith, J. R.
, & Golden, P. A. (1989). Strategic planning and organizational performance in a business simulation: An empirical study. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning, 16, 188-190.
28.
Spangehl, S. D.
(1987, January/February). The push to assess. Change, pp. 35-39.
29.
Teach, R. D.
(1984). Using spatial relationships to estimate demand in business simulations. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning, 11, 244-246.
30.
Teach, R. D.
(1990). Profits: The false prophet in business games. Simulation & Gaming, 21, 12-26.
31.
Teach, R. D.
(1993). Forecasting and management ability: A response to Wolfe. Simulation & Gaming, 24,63-72.
32.
Thavikulwat, P.
(1991). CEO: A business simulation for policy and strategic management [Computer software]. New York: McGraw-Hill. (Out of print. A new version is available from the author.)
33.
Thavikulwat, P.
(1994-1997). DEAL: An entrepreneurship gaming simulation [Computer software]. Towson, MD: Towson University. (Available: 8000 York Road, Towson, MD 21252, USA; URL http://www.towson.edu/-precha)
34.
Thavikulwat, P.
(1994-1997). GEO: An international-business gaming simulation [Computer software]. Towson, MD: Towson University. (Available: 8000 York Road, Towson, MD 21252, USA; URLhttp://www.towson.edu/-precha)
35.
Wolfe, J.
(1990). The evaluation of computer-based business games: Methodology, findings, and future needs. In J. W. Gentry (Ed.), Guide to business gaming and experiential learning (pp. 279-300). East Brunswick, NJ: Nichols/GP.
36.
Wolfe, J.
(1993a). Forecasting and management ability: A rebuttal to Teach's response. Simulation & Gaming, 24,73-75.
37.
Wolfe, J.
(1993b). On the propriety of forecasting accuracy as a measurement of team management ability: A preliminary investigation. Simulation & Gaming, 24, 47-62.
38.
Wolfe, J.
, & Teach, R. D. (1987). Three downloaded mainframe business games: A review. Academy of Management Review, 12, 181-192.
