A MARKSTRAT2 simulation scenario involving teams in different starting positions was used to investigate the influence of starting position on team profitability performance. Although the claim made by the simulation authors that no team has a systematic advantage was confirmed, it was also shown that one team has a distinct disadvantage resulting in a significantly inferior performance. The author discusses the implications of this for both marketing educators and researchers using simulations with different starting positions.
Buzzell, R. D.
, & Gale, B. T. (1987). The PIMS principles: Linking strategy to performance. New York: Free Press.
2.
Curren, M. T.
, Folkes, V. S., & Steckel, J. H. (1992). Explanations for successful and unsuccessful marketing decisions: The decision maker's perspective. Journal of Marketing, 56, 18-31.
3.
Faria, A.
(1986). A test of student performance and attitudes under varying game conditions. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises, 13, 70-75.
4.
Gatignon, H.
(1987). Strategic studies in MARKSTRAT2. Journal of Business Research, 15, 469-480.
5.
Gentry, J. W.
(1980). Group size and attitudes toward the simulation experience. Simulation & Games: An International Journal, 11, 451-460.
6.
Glazer, R.
, Steckel, J. H., & Winer, R. S. (1987). Group process and decision performance in a simulated marketing environment. Journal of Business Research, 15, 545-557.
7.
Gosenpud, J.
, Miessing, P., & Milton, C. J. (1984). A research study on strategic decisions in a business simulation. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises, 11, 161-165.
8.
Homaday, R. W.
, & Curran, K. E. (1988). Formal planning, simulation team performance, and satisfaction: A replication. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises, 15, 138-141.
9.
Jaffe, E. D.
, & Nebenzahl, I. D. (1990). Group interaction and business game performance. Simulation & Gaming: An International Journal, 21, 133-146.
10.
Keller, G.
, Warrack, B., & Bartel, H. (1994). Statistics for management and economics: A systematic approach (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
11.
Lucas, H. C.
(1979). Performance in a complex management game. Simulation & Games: An International Journal, 10, 61-74.
12.
MARKSTRAT2: A Marketing Simulation Game. Larrcche, J.-C., & Gatignon, H. (1990). Palo Alto, CA: Scientific Press (507 Seaport Court, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA).
13.
Norris, D. R.
, & Niebuhr, R. E. (1980). Group variables and gaming success. Simulation & Games: An International Journal, 11, 301-312.
14.
Wolfe, J.
(1976). Correlates and measures of the external validity of computer-based business policy decision-making environments. Simulation & Games: An International Journal, 7, 411-438.
15.
Wolfe, J.
, Bowen, D. D., & Roberts, C. R. (1989). Team building effects on company performance: A business game-based study. Simulation & Games: An International Journal, 20, 388-408.
16.
Wolfe, J.
, & Chacko, T. I. (1983). Team-size effects on business game performance and decision-making behaviours. Decision Sciences, 14, 121-133.
17.
Wolfe, J.
, & Roberts, C. R. (1986). The effects of different grade weights on business game learning levels. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 14, 307-316.
