Recently, the study of civil wars has attracted more and more attention from scholars of international relations. Using a computer simulation called EARTH (Exploring Alternative Realpolitik THeses) that not only simulates a realist world, but also includes civil wars, the author explores what aspects of a realist world are associated with the onset of civil war. Although features of a realist world are not the dominate factors in accounting for civil wars, the loss of territory that accompanies losing interstate wars does influence the chances of states undergoing civil war.
AnnanK. A. (1999). Preventing war and disaster: A growing global challenge (Annual report on the work of the organization). Retrieved June 5, 2008, from http://www.un.org/Docs/SG/Report99/toc.htm
2.
BouldingK. (1962). Conflict and defense. New York: Harper.
3.
BremerS.MihalkaM. (1977). Machiavelli in machina: Or politics among hexagons. In DeutschK.FritschB.JaguaribeH.MarkovitsS. (Eds.), Problems of world modeling: Political and social implications (pp. 303-338). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
4.
CarneiroR. (1970a). A theory of the origin of the state. Science, 169, 733-738.
5.
CarneiroR. (1970b). Comments and a reply. Science, 170, 930-931.
6.
CarneiroR. (1978). Political expansion as an expression of the principle of competitive exclusion. In CohenR.ServiceE. (Eds.), Origins of the state: The anthropology of political evolution (pp. 205-224). Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.
7.
ClaudeI. (1989). The balance of power revisited. Review of International Studies, 15(2), 77-85.
8.
CroweE. (1928). Memorandum on the present state of British relations with France and Germany (January 1, 1907). In GoochG.TemperlyH. (Eds.), British documents on the origins of the war, 1898-1914 (Vol. 3, pp. 402-406). London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office.
9.
CusackT. R.StollR. J. (1990). Exploring realpolitik: Probing international relations theory with computer simulation. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
10.
DavidS. (1997). Internal war: Causes and cures. World Politics, 49, 552-576.
11.
DoughertyJ.PfaltzgraffR. (2001). Contending theories of international relations: A comprehensive survey (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
12.
FearonJ.LaitinD. (2003). Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review, 97, 75-90.
13.
GuicciardiniF. (1969). The history of Italy (AlexanderS., Trans. and Ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1561)
14.
GulickE. (1955). Europe’s classical balance of power: A case history of the theory and practice of the great concepts of European statecraft. New York: Norton.
15.
HegreH.SambanisN. (2006). Sensitivity analysis of empirical results on civil war onset. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50,508-535.
16.
HerzJ. (1950). Idealist internationalism and the security dilemma. World Politics, 2, 157-180.
17.
JervisR. (1978). Cooperation under the security dilemma. World Politics, 30, 167-214.
18.
KaplanM. (1957). System and process in international politics. New York: Wiley.
19.
KennedyP. (1987). The rise and fall of the great powers: Economic change and military conflict from 1500 to 2000. New York: Random House.
20.
KissingerH. (1957). A world restored: Metternich, Castlereagh and the problems of peace, 1813-1822. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
21.
KissingerH. (1994). Diplomacy. New York: Simon & Schuster.
22.
MachiavelliN. (1961). The prince. London: Penguin. (Original work published 1514)
23.
MackA. (2002). Civil war: Academic research and the policy community. Journal of Peace Research, 39,515-525.
24.
MearsheimerJ. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. New York. Norton.
25.
ModelskiG. (1964). Kautilya: Foreign policy and international system in the ancient Hindu world. American Political Science Review, 58,549-560.
26.
ModelskiG. (1987). Long cycles in world politics. Seattle: University of Washington.
27.
MorgenthauH.ThompsonK. (1985). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace (6th ed.). New York: Alfred A. Knopf. (Original work published 1948)
28.
PalmerG. (2007, November). Remarks at business meeting. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Peace Science Society (International), Columbia, SC.
29.
PosenB. (1993). The security dilemma and ethnic conflict. In BrownM. (Ed.), Ethnic conflict and international security (pp. 103-124). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
RoseW. (2000). The security dilemma and ethnic conflict: Some new hypotheses. Security Studies, 9(4), 1-51.
31.
RousseauJ. (1970). Excerpts from various writings. In ForsythM.Keens-SoterH. M. A.SavigearP. (Eds.), The theory of international relations: Selected texts from Gentili to Treitschke (pp. 127-180). London: Allen & Unwin.
32.
SaidemanS. (2002). Overlooking the obvious: Bringing international politics back into ethnic conflict management. International Studies Review, 4(3), 63-86.
33.
SarkeesM. R. (2000). The Correlates of War data on war: An update to 1997. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 18, 123-144.
34.
StollR. J. (1998). Nice states finish . . . pretty well: Collective security behavior in militarized interstate disputes, 1816-1992. International Interactions, 24, 287-313.
35.
StollR. J. (2005). Civil reality? Simulation experiments on the impact of civil war in a realist world. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 22, 19-38.
36.
StollR. J. (2008). Is Leo Durocher right? Do “nice states finish last?” In PalmerG. (Ed.), Causes and consequences of international conflict: Data, methods and theory (pp. 165-185). London: Routledge.
37.
ThompsonW. (1988). On global war: Historical-structural approaches to world politics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
38.
ToynbeeA. (1954). A study of history (Vol. 9). London: Oxford University Press.
39.
VasquezJ. (1997). The realist paradigm and degenerative versus progressive research programs: An appraisal of neotraditional research on Waltz’s balancing proposition. American Political Science Review, 91, 899-912.
40.
VinciA. (2006). Greed-grievance reconsidered: The role of power and survival in the motivation of armed groups. Civil Wars, 8, 25-45.
41.
WagnerR. H. (2007). War and the state: The theory of international politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
42.
WaltzK. (1979). Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
43.
WaltzK. (1986). Reflections on theory of international politics: A response to my critics. In KeohaneR. (Ed.), Neorealism and its critics (pp. 322-345). New York: Columbia University Press.
44.
WaymanF.DiehlP. (1994). Realism reconsidered: The Realpolitik framework and its basic proportions. In WaymanF.DiehlP. (Eds.), Reconstructing Realpolitik (pp. 3-26). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
