The theory for validating computerized business simulators proposed in this article is based on several premises derived from the research literature. Unique to the theory is the use of a hypothesis test and a methodology to describe the behavior of a simulator from the perspective of the student. THE EXECUTIVE GAME is validated to demonstrate the methodology of the theory. THE EXECUTIVE GAME is shown to be unstable, but it is suitable for the development of forecasting skills using exponential smoothing models. It is also shown that the proposed validation methodology reveals much more about the behavior of a simulator than existing validation methods. The theory should help simulation users choose simulators that closely match the learning goals of the courses in which computerized business simulators are used.
AACSB
. (1987). Outcome measurement project: Phase III report. St. Louis, MO: American Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business.
2.
Biggs, W. D.
(1979). Who is using computerized business games. In S. C. Certo & D. C. Berenstuhl (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Conference of the Association for Business Simulation and Experiential Learning.
3.
Biggs, W. D.
(1987). Functional business games. Simulation & Games, 18, 242-267.
4.
Boyatzis, R. E.
(1982). The competent manager: A model for effective performance. New York: Wiley.
5.
Box, G.P.E.
, & Draper, N. R. (1987). Empirical model-building and response surfaces. New York: Wiley.
6.
Box, G.P.E.
, Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, J. S. (1978). Statistics for experimenters, New York: Wiley.
7.
Dittrich, J. E.
(1977). Realism in business games: A three game comparison. Simulation & Games, 8, 201-210.
8.
Faria, A. J.
(1987). A survey of the use of business games in academia and business. Simulation & Games, 18, 207-224.
9.
Fletcher, J. L.
(1971). The effectiveness of simulation games as learning environments: A proposed program of research. Simulation & Games, 4, 425-454.
10.
Gold, S. C.
, & Pray, T. (1984a). Modeling non-price factors in the demand functions of computerized business simulations. In D. M. Currie & J. W. Gentry (Eds.), Developments in business simulation and experiential exercises (pp. 240-243). Normal: Illinois State University.
11.
Gold, S. C.
, & Pray, T. (1984b). Modeling market- and firm-level demand functions in computerized business simulations. Simulation & Games, 15, 364-363.
12.
Hemmasi, M.
, Graf, L. A., & Kellogg, C. E. (1989). A comparison of the performance, behaviors, and analysis strategies of MBA versus BBA students in a simulation environment. Simulation & Games, 20, 15-30.
13.
Henshaw, R. C.
, & Jackson, J. R. (1984). THE EXECUTIVE GAME. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
14.
Hsu, E.
(1989). Role-event gaming simulation in management education. Simulation & Games, 20, 409-438.
15.
Keys, B.
(1987). Total enterprise business games. Simulation & Games, 18, 225-241.
16.
Khuri, A. I.
, & Cornell, J. A. (1987). Response surfaces: Designs and analyses. New York: Marcel Dekker.
17.
Mehrez, A.
, Reichel, A., & Olami, R. (1987). The business game versus reality. Simulation & Games, 18,488-500.
18.
Miles, W. G.
, Biggs, W. D., & Shubert, J. N. (1986). Student perceptions of skill acquisition through cases and a general management simulation. Simulation & Games, 17, 7-24.
19.
Myers, R. H.
(1971). Response surface methodology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
20.
Neter, J.
, & Wasserman, W. (1974). Applied linear statistical models. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
21.
Pray, T.
, & Gold, S. (1982). Inside the black box: An analysis of underlying market and demand functions in contemporary business simulations. In D. J. Fritzsche & L. A. Graf (Eds.), Developments in business simulation and experiential learning, (pp. 110-115). Normal: Illinois State University.
22.
Remus, W.
(1977). Who likes business games?Simulation & Games, 8, 469-480.
23.
Remus, W.
(1983). Consistency in business games. Simulation & Games, 14, 155-162.
24.
Stanislaw, H.
(1986). Tests of computer simulation validity. Simulation and Games, 17, 173-191.
25.
Teach, R. D.
(1984). Using spatial relationships to estimate demand in business simulations. In D. M. Currie & J. W. Gentry (Eds.), Developments in business simulation and experiential exercises (pp. 244-246). Normal: Illinois State University.
26.
Wolfe, J.
(1978). The effects of game complexity on the acquisition of business policy knowledge. Decision Sciences, 9, 143-155.
27.
Wolfe, J.
(1985). The teaching effectiveness of games in collegiate business courses: A 1973-1983 update. Simulation & Games, 16, 251-288.
28.
Wolfe, J.
, & Jackson, R. (1989). An investigation of the need for valid business game algorithms. In T. Pray & J. Wingender (Eds.), Developments in business simulation and experiential learning (pp. 31-36). Stillwater: Oklahoma State University.
29.
Wolfe, J.
, & Teach, R. (1987). Three down-loaded mainframe business games: A review. Academy of Management Review, 12, 181-192.
30.
VanSickle, R. L.
(1978). Designing simulation games to teach decision-making skills. Simulation & Games, 9,413-428.
