This article investigates computer-game aesthetics using Q methodology. Four criteria (fantasy, curiosity, challenge, and interactivity) useful in evaluating computer games in past research are isolated. A naturalistic Q-sample of statements based on these criteria are then rank ordered by "frequent" and "accomplished" computer gameplayers. Factor analysis ofthe Q-sort indicates those aesthetics associated with "all games, " "video games, " and "home computer game&" Further results compare video-game aesthetics with home-computer-game aesthetics. Suggestions for further research discuss the advantages of basing game evaluation and criticism on subjective elements ofplay.
Bright, G. W.
(1985). What research says: Teaching probability and estimation of length and angle measurements through microcomputer instructional games. School Science and Mathematics, 85, 513-522.
2.
Condry, J.
, & Keith, D. (1983). Educational and recreational use of computer technology: Computer instruction and video games. Youth & Society, 15, 87-112.
3.
Crawford, C.
(1984). The art of computer game design, Berkeley, CA: Osborne/McGraw-Hill.
4.
Dominick, J. R.
(1984). Videogames, television violence, and aggression in teenagers. Journal of Communication, 34(2), 136-147.
5.
Dorval, M.
, & Pepin, M. (1986). Effect of playing a video game on a measure of spatial visualization. Perceptual Motor Skills, 62, 159-162.
6.
Ellis, D.
(1984). Video arcades, youth, and trouble. Youth & Society, 16, 47-65.
7.
Kerlinger, F. N.
(1973). Foundations of behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
8.
Malone, T. W.
(1981a, December). What makes computer games fun?Byte, pp. 258-277.
9.
Malone, T. W.
(1981b). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 4, 333-369.
10.
McKeown, B.
, & Thomas, D. (1988). Q methodology (Sage University Press series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences No. 07-006). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
Myers, D.
(1984). The patterns of player-game relationships: A study of computer game players. Simulation & Games, 15, 159-185.
12.
Niesz, A. J.
& Holland, N. N. (1984). Interactive Fiction. Critical Inquiry, 11, 110-129.
13.
Price, J. A.
(1985). Social science research on video games. Journal of Popular Culture, 18(4), 111-125.
14.
Randall, N.
(1988). Determining literariness in interactive fiction. Computers and Humanities, 22, 183-191.
15.
Rogers, E. M.
(1983). The diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
16.
Selnow, G. W.
(1984). Playing video games: The electronic friend. Journal of Communication, 34(2), 148-156.
17.
Stephenson, W.
(1953). The study of behavior: Q technique and its methodology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Wigand, R. T.
, Borstelmann, S. E., & Boster, F. J. (1986). Electronic Leisure: Video game usage and the communication climate of video arcades. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Mass Communication Yearbook (Vol. 6, pp. 275-293). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
