Critical Voice: Centering Students With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities in Postsecondary Education Through Participatory Co-Design of Micro TTRPGs

Abstract

Background

Postsecondary education (PSE) opportunities for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are expanding through Comprehensive Transition Programs (CTPs). However, approaches that authentically capture these students’ voices and lived experiences remain limited. Participatory game co-design, particularly through micro tabletop role-playing games (TTRPGs), offers a novel and inclusive method to engage students in reflecting on their academic, social, and personal transitions.

Purpose

This study investigated the use of micro TTRPG participatory co design as a tool for eliciting perceptions of PSE students with IDD, focusing on their experiences in a CTP.

Method

Students enrolled in a CTP collaborated with a staff facilitator to co-design three micro TTRPGs centered on academic, social, and personal challenges. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected through the design process, including the game topics generated, student surveys, and a semi-structured staff interview. Additionally, students and staff shared perspectives on the potential utility of micro TTRPGs for supporting perspective-taking and transition-related discussions.

Results

The co-design process yielded three micro TTRPGs that highlighted key challenges and opportunities faced by students with IDD in their CTP experience. Data revealed that the games fostered student voice, emphasized their lived experiences, and encouraged reflection on transition supports. Both students and staff identified micro TTRPGs as a promising strategy for promoting engagement and dialogue around academic and social transitions.

Discussion and Conclusion

Findings underscore the potential of participatory micro TTRPG co-design as a meaningful and inclusive approach to transition support for students with IDD in PSE contexts. By centering student voices in creative and collaborative design processes, micro TTRPGs may inform future program development, enhance student engagement, and strengthen practices that support inclusive postsecondary pathways.

Keywords

analogue games tabletop role-playing games micro tabletop role playing games participatory co-design intellectual and developmental disabilities comprehensive transition programs

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

About CC Licenses . (2019). Creative Commons. https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/cclicenses/

About Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities . (2021). National Institute of Health. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/idds/conditioninfo

Abt

(1970). Serious Games. The Viking Press.

Andrew

Barwood

Boston

Masek

Bloomfield

Devine

(2023). Serious games for health promotion in adolescents – a systematic scoping review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5519-5550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11414-9

Arenas

D. L.

Viduani

Araujo

R. B.

(2022). Therapeutic use of role-playing game (RPG) in mental health: A scoping review. Simulation & Gaming, 53(3), 285-311. https://doi.org/10.1177/10468781211073720

Atherton

Hathaway

Visuri

Cross

(2025). A critical hit: Dungeons and dragons as a buff for autistic people. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 29(2), 382-394. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613241275260

Baker

J. N.

Lowrey

K. A.

Wennerlind

K. R.

(2018). Building an inclusive post-secondary education program for young adults with intellectual developmental disability. Physical Disabilities: Education and Related Services, 37(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.14434/pders.v37i2.25738

Balli

(2018). Game jams to co-create respiratory health games prototypes as participatory research methodology. Forum, Qualitative Social Research, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.2734

Brewer

Movahedazarhouligh

(2021). Students with intellectual and developmental disabilities in inclusive higher education: Perceptions of stakeholders in a first-year experience. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(9), 993-1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1597184

10.

Butler

Laura N.

Sheppard-Jones

Kathy

Whaley

Barry

Harrison

Beth

Osness

Michelle

.(2016). “Does Participation in Higher Education Make a Difference in Life Outcomes for Students with Intellectual Disability?” Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 44(3): 295–298. doi:https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-160804.

11.

Carter

E. W.

Gustafson

J. R.

Mackay

M. M.

Martin

K. P.

Parsley

M. V.

Graves

Day

T. L.

McCabe

L. E.

Lazarz

McMillan

E. D.

Schiro-Geist

Williams

Beeson

Cayton

(2019). Motivations and expectations of peer mentors within inclusive higher education programs for students with intellectual disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 42(3), 168-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143418779989

12.

Caserman

Hoffmann

Müller

Schaub

Straßburg

Wiemeyer

Bruder

Göbel

(2020). Quality criteria for serious games: Serious part, game part, and balance. JMIR Serious Games, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.2196/19037

13.

Cezarotto

Martinez

Chamberlin

(2022). Developing inclusive games: Design frameworks for accessibility and diversity. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.108456

14.

Csíkszentmihályi

(1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. HarperCollins.

15.

D’Amato

(2020). The ultimate micro-RPG book: 40 fast, easy, and fun tabletop games. Adams Media.

16.

Danilovic

(2024). Games (Arts for health book series). Emerald Publishing.

17.

Deterding

Zagal

(2018). Role-playing game studies: Transmedia foundations. Routledge.

18.

FAQs on Intellectual Disability . (2025). American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. https://www.aaidd.org/intellectual-disability/faqs-on-intellectual-disability

19.

Federal Student Aid . (2020, January 3). Students with intellectual disabilities [opportunities for federal aid and program list]. https://studentaid.gov/understand-aid/eligibility/requirements/intellectual-disabilities

20.

Fullerton

(2024). Game design workshop: A playcentric approach to creating innovative games, 5th Edition. Taylor & Francis.

21.

Garcia

F. E.

de Almeida

Neris

Vânia

Paula

. (2022). A framework for tailorable games: Toward inclusive end-user development of inclusive games. Universal Access in the Information Society, 21(1), 193-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00779-8

22.

Gee

J. P.

(2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (rev. ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

23.

Global Game Jam . (n d.). https://globalgamejam.org/what-game-jam

24.

Grammenos

Savidis

Stephanidis

(2007). Unified design of universally accessible games. In Stephanidis

(Ed.), Universal access in human-computer interaction. applications and services (pp. 607-616). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73283-9_67

25.

Grigal

Hart

Papay

Bukaty

Choiseul-Praslin

Pound

(2024). Executive Summary of the Annual Report of the Cohort 3 TPSID Model Demonstration Projects. University of Massachusetts Boston, Institute for Community Inclusion.

26.

Grigal

Papay

Weir

Hart

McClellan

M. L.

(2022). Characteristics of higher education programs enrolling students with intellectual disability in the United States. Inclusion, 10(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-10.1.35

27.

Gygax

Areneson

(1974). Dungeons & Dragons. TSR, Inc.

28.

Hammer

Shultz

Peck

E. M.

(2018). Learning and role-playing games. In Zagal

Deterding

(Eds.), Role-playing game studies. A transmedia approach (pp. 283-299). Routledge.

29.

Harper

(2013). Lasers & Feelings. https://www.onesevendesign.com/laserfeelings/

30.

Hill

Wisniewski

Patten

(2023). Lessons learned from group counseling with young adults with intellectual disabilities enrolled in a comprehensive transition program. Journal of Inclusive Postsecondary Education, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.13021/jipe.2023.3171

31.

Huizinga

(1955). Homo ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. Beacon Press. (Original work published 1938).

32.

Jessen

Mirkovic

Ruland

C. M.

(2018). Creating gameful design in mHealth: A participatory co-design approach. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 6(12), e11579. https://doi.org/10.2196/11579

33.

Kildea

Battista

Cabral

Hendren

Herrera

Hijal

Joseph

(2019). Design and development of a person-centered patient portal using participatory stakeholder co-design. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(2), e11371. https://doi.org/10.2196/11371

34.

Kilmer

E. D.

Davis

A. D.

Kilmer

J. N.

Johns

A. R.

(2023). Therapeutically applied role-playing games. Routledge.

35.

Koenitz

(2023). Understanding interactive digital narrative. Routledge.

36.

Kohler

Gothberg

Andrews

W. D.

Mahon

Seabrooks-Blackmore

(2023). A nominal group technique study identifying evidence-based and promising practices: Taxonomy for postsecondary comprehensive transition programs. Journal of Inclusive Postsecondary Education, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.13021/jipe.2023.3176

37.

Lamb

R. L.

Annetta

Firestone

Etopio

(2018). A meta-analysis with examination of moderators of student cognition, affect, and learning outcomes while using serious educational games, serious games, and simulations. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 158-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.040

38.

Lasers and Feelings Hacks . (2022). Writing Alchemy. https://writingalchemy.net/resources/lasers-and-feelings-hacks/

39.

Lee

C. E.

Taylor

J. L.

(2022). A review of the benefits and barriers to postsecondary education for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 55(4), 234-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669211013354

40.

Leogrande

Brown

(2026). Everybody wins: Role-playing games with students with disabilities. In Education and analog role-playing games (1st ed., pp. 31–40). CRC Press.

41.

Löytömäki

Ohtonen

Huttunen

(2024). Serious game the emotion detectives helps to improve social–emotional skills of children with neurodevelopmental disorders. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(3), 1126-1144. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13420

42.

National Parent Center on Transition and Employment . (2019). Inclusive postsecondary education for students with disabilities. https://www.pacer.org/transition/learning-center/postsecondary/college-options.asp

43.

Novak

(2024). A serious game (MyDiabetic) to support children's education in type 1 diabetes mellitus: Iterative participatory co-design and feasibility study. JMIR Serious Games, 12, e49478. https://doi.org/10.2196/49478

44.

One-Page RGP Jam 2025 . (2025, August). Itch.io. https://itch.io/jam/one-page-rpg-jam-2025

45.

Pacheco-Velazquez

Rodes-Paragarino

Rabago-Mayer

Bester

(2023). How to create serious games? proposal for a participatory methodology. International Journal of Serious Games, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v10i4.642

46.

Robertson

Simonsen

. (2013). Routledge international handbook of participatory design. Routledge.

47.

Rorem Colquhoun

Melenberg

Pei

(2026). Tabletop role playing games as a way forward with structurally marginalized youth: A narrative review. Children and Youth Services Review, 181, 108739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108739

48.

Salen

Zimmerman

(2003). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. MIT Press.

49.

Sanders

E. B.

Brandt

Binder

(2010). A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference (PDC ‘10). Association for Computing Machinery. New York, NY, USA. 195–198. https://doi.org/10.1145/1900441.1900476

50.

Seif El-Nasr

Carstensdottir

John

(2026). Designing serious games. The MIT Press.

51.

Spruit

Carter

E. W.

(2021). Friendships through inclusive postsecondary education programs: Perspectives of current and former students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 59(6), 487-501. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-59.6.487

52.

Suits

(1978). The grasshopper: Games, life and utopia. University of Toronto Press.

53.

Sweetser

Wyeth

(2005). GameFlow: A model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. Computers in Entertainment, 3(3), doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1077246.1077253

54.

System Reference Document v5.2.1 . (2025). D&D Beyond. https://www.dndbeyond.com/srd?srsltid=AfmBOoou5lPVnlvFu2AF0ziItz500F2O52KccDv_iaLcBMHm6owCSwoU

55.

Talebi Azadboni

Nasiri

Khenarinezhad

Sadoughi

(2024). Effectiveness of serious games in social skills training to autistic individuals: A systematic review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 161, 105634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105634

56.

Think College . (2025). College search. Retrieved from https://thinkcollege.net/college-search

57.

Tran

K. M.

(2016). “Her story was complex”: A twine workshop for ten-to twelve-year-old girls. E-Learning and Digital Media, 13(5-6), 212-226. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753016689635

58.

Vanden Bempt

Economou

Dehairs

Vandermosten

Wouters

Ghesquière

Vanderauwera

(2022). Feasibility, enjoyment, and language comprehension impact of a tablet- and GameFlow-based story-listening game for kindergarteners: Methodological and mixed methods study. JMIR Serious Games, 10(1), e34698. https://doi.org/10.2196/34698

59.

Wang

Tsau

(2019). Flow learning experience: Applying marketing theory to serious game design. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(2), 417-447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117752454

60.

Watts

G. W.

Davis

M. T.

López

E. J.

(2024). “How are you doing?”: College instructors’ relationships and communication with students with intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2023.2176411

61.

Whirley

M. L.

Gilson

C. B.

Gushanas

C. M.

(2020). Postsecondary education programs on college campuses supporting adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities in the literature: A scoping review. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 43(4), 195-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420929655

62.

Zamboni

Farber

Merchant

(2024). Roll for learning: 51 micro tabletop role-playing games to use in the classroom. Play Story Press.

63.

Zimmerman

(2022). The rules we break: Lessons in play, thinking, and design. Princeton Architectural Press.