India’s online gaming industry has seen rapid growth, with over 425 million gamers in 2023. While gaming offers recreational and economic benefits, it also raises public health concerns, particularly regarding problematic gaming behaviors among adolescents and young adults. Regulatory challenges have emerged as authorities attempt to balance industry growth with consumer protection.
Aim
To examine the impact of recent regulatory measures in India’s online gaming sector, including taxation policies and international regulatory frameworks, towards reducing gaming-related harm.
Methods
This theoretical article discusses the current landscape of India’s gaming regulation. Relevant legal documents, government policies, academic literature, and reliable news sources were purposively selected to assess their implications for public health and consumer protection. International regulatory frameworks from major gaming markets were also reviewed to identify effective harm reduction strategies.
Results
Structural game elements, monetization strategies, and socio-environmental factors play a significant role in contributing to harm related to gaming. On an international scale, harm reduction strategies such as playtime restrictions, responsible gaming tools, and financial limits have proven effective in mitigating problematic gaming behavior.
Recommendation
India’s regulatory framework should incorporate harm reduction policies to address gaming addiction and financial risks effectively. Developing evidence-based taxation models is essential to prevent tax evasion while ensuring sustainable industry growth. Additionally, public awareness campaigns must be implemented to educate users on responsible gaming practices. Strengthening the governance of self-regulatory bodies is also crucial to enforcing ethical game design and enhancing player protection measures.
Conclusion
A balanced regulatory approach integrating public health considerations, economic feasibility, and international best practices is crucial for safeguarding users while ensuring the sustainable development of India’s gaming industry.
DaviesB.BlakeE. (2016). Evaluating Existing Strategies to Limit Video Game Playing Time. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 36(2), 47–57. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.
https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2016.25
GaoY.-X.WangJ.-Y.DongG.-H. (2022). The prevalence and possible risk factors of internet gaming disorder among adolescents and young adults: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 154, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.06.049
GriffithsM. D. (2012). Internet gambling, player protection, and social responsibility. In Routledge International Handbook of Internet Gambling. Routledge.
GünayH. (2023). Taxation as a policy instrument for social and economic effects of gambling. Journal of Gambling Issues. https://doi.org/10.4309/MKME8615
25.
GurjarY. J.NikitaS.HimalayJ.MargiJ.RajveersinhJ.AbhishekJ.HarshH.JaydipJ. (2024). The Prevalence of internet gaming disorder and its associated factors among college students in Saurashtra Region, Gujarat, India. Addiction & Health, 16(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.34172/ahj.2024.1451
26.
HingN.RussellA. M. T.KingD. L.RockloffM.BrowneM.NewallP.GreerN. (2023). Not all games are created equal: Adolescents who play and spend money on simulated gambling games show greater risk for gaming disorder. Addictive Behaviors, 137, 107525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107525
KingD. L.DelfabbroP. H.DohY. Y.WuA. M. S.KussD. J.PallesenS.MentzoniR.CarragherN.SakumaH. (2018). Policy and prevention approaches for disordered and hazardous gaming and internet use: An International perspective. Prevention Science, 19(2), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0813-1
32.
KirályO.GriffithsM. D.KingD. L.LeeH.-K.LeeS.-Y.BányaiF.ZsilaÁ.TakacsZ. K.DemetrovicsZ. (2018). Policy responses to problematic video game use: A systematic review of current measures and future possibilities. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(3), 503–517. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6.2017.050
33.
KühnS.RomanowskiA.SchillingC.LorenzR.MörsenC.SeiferthN.BanaschewskiT.BarbotA.BarkerG. J.BüchelC.ConrodP. J.DalleyJ. W.FlorH.GaravanH.IttermannB.MannK.MartinotJ.-L.PausT.RietschelM.GallinatJ. (2011). The neural basis of video gaming. Translational Psychiatry, 1(11), e53. https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2011.53
MaceyJ.HamariJ. (2018). Investigating relationships between video gaming, spectating esports, and gambling. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 344–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.027
42.
Maldonado-MurcianoL.GuileraG.MontagC.PontesH. M. (2022). Disordered gaming in esports: Comparing professional and non-professional gamers. Addictive Behaviors, 132, 107342.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107342
MarquesL. M.UchidaP. M.AguiarF. O.KadriG.SantosR. I. M.BarbosaS. P. (2023). Escaping through virtual gaming—what is the association with emotional, social, and mental health? A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1257685. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1257685
45.
McCaffreyM. (2019). The macro problem of microtransactions: The self-regulatory challenges of video game loot boxes. Business Horizons, 62(4), 483–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.03.001
PallaviciniF.PepeA.MantovaniF. (2022). The effects of playing video games on stress, anxiety, depression, loneliness, and gaming disorder during the early stages of the covid-19 pandemic: PRISMA Systematic Review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 25(6), 334–354. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2021.0252
55.
PontesH. M.SchivinskiB.KannenC.MontagC. (2022). The interplay between time spent gaming and disordered gaming: A large-scale world-wide study. Social Science & Medicine, 296, 114721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114721
RajaU. S.Al-BaghliR. (2025). Ethical concerns in contemporary virtual reality and frameworks for pursuing responsible use. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2025.1451273
60.
RaneriP. C.MontagC.RozgonjukD.SatelJ.PontesH. M. (2022). The role of microtransactions in Internet Gaming Disorder and Gambling Disorder: A preregistered systematic review. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 15, 100415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2022.100415
61.
SachanP.AryaA.SinghS.GuptaP. K.AgarwalV.GuptaV. (2022). A clinical study of internet gaming disorder in adolescents with psychiatric disorders. Journal of Mental Health and Human Behaviour, 27(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmhhb.jmhhb_165_21
62.
SainiV.BaniyaG.VermaK.SoniA.KesharwaniS. (2016). A study on relationship of facebook and game addictive behaviour with personality traits among medical students. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 3492–3497. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20162318
63.
SinghS.BalharaY. P. S. (2024). Rules for online gaming regulation in India: The endgame or we need to level up?Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 46(6), 589–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176231206938
64.
SinghS.DahiyaN.SinghA. B.KumarR.BalharaY. P. S. (2019). Gaming disorder among medical college students from India: Exploring the pattern and correlates. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 28(1), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_96_18
65.
SpicerS. G.FullwoodC.CloseJ.NicklinL. L.LloydJ.LloydH. (2022). Loot boxes and problem gambling: Investigating the “gateway hypothesis”. Addictive Behaviors, 131, 107327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107327
66.
StevensM. W.DorstynD.DelfabbroP. H.KingD. L. (2021). Global prevalence of gaming disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 55(6), 553–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867420962851
67.
StrebeckZ. (2023, April 20). Video game laws in the US [Stay Compliant!]. Video Game Lawyer | Zachary C. Strebeck | Attorney at Law. https://strebecklaw.com/game-laws-us/
68.
TabriN.XuerebS.CringleN.ClarkL. (2022). Associations between financial gambling motives, gambling frequency and level of problem gambling: A meta-analytic review. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 117(3), 559–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15642
TIOL Knowledge Foundation. (2023). A conducive policy framework for GST on online gaming[White paper, 2023].
75.
WangL.LiJ.ChenY.ChaiX.ZhangY.WangZ.TanH.GaoX. (2021). Gaming motivation and negative psychosocial outcomes in male adolescents: An individual-centered 1-Year longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.743273
76.
WardleH.KolesnikovA.FiedlerI.CritchlowN.HuntK. (2023). Is the economic model of gambling dependent on problem gambling? Evidence from an online survey of regular sports bettors in Britain. International Gambling Studies, 23(1), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2022.2088823
77.
WN Hub. (2024, August 30). Tax incentives that a gaming company can expect in leading countries—Column by REVERA. https://wnhub.io/news/legal/item-45272
XiaoL. Y. (2023). Breaking Ban: Belgium’s ineffective gambling law regulation of video game loot boxes. Collabra: Psychology, 9(1), 57641. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.57641
81.
Young Gamers and Gamblers Education Trust. (2019, September). How gaming & gambling affect student life: Full Insight Report. Young Gamers and Gamblers Education Trust, 71 – 75Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London, WC2.
82.
ZendleD.CairnsP. (2018). Video game loot boxes are linked to problem gambling: Results of a large-scale survey. PLoS ONE, 13(11), e0206767. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206767
