Games, and board games in particular, have shown themselves to be a promising avenue to help improve creative potential. However, these findings do not explain the reason as to why board games would be linked to or improve creativity. This paper focuses on one particular variable that could mediate the links between board game play habits and creativity: playfulness.
Method
This quantitative study first examined whether board game play habits are positively related to two creativity measures: creative self-concept and creativity in the workplace. Furthermore, it was hypothesized that playfulness would have a mediating effect between board game play habits and creativity outcomes. Data was collected from 327 French workers using online recruitment through social networks, by means of a questionnaire-based survey.
Results
Results show that board game play habits are positively correlated with both creativity in the workplace and creative self-concept. Furthermore, the adult playfulness dimension of fun-seeking motivation mediate the relationship between board game play habits and both creativity in the workplace and creative self-concept.
Discussion
Playing more board games is associated with higher playfulness, which in turn is associated with more creativity in the workplace and higher creative self-concept. These findings suggest that encouraging board game play, notably playing a broad range of board games, could help foster playfulness and thus improve creativity.
AcarS.TadikH.MyersD.Van der SmanC.UysalR. (2021). Creativity and well-being: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(3), 738–751. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.485
2.
AfifiT. O.LaPlanteD. A.TaillieuT. L.DowdD.ShafferH. J. (2014). Gambling involvement: Considering frequency of play and the moderating effects of gender and age. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 12(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-013-9452-3
3.
AmabileT. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), Article 1.
4.
AmabileT. M.PrattM. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001
5.
BakkerA. B.ScharpY. S.BreevaartK.De VriesJ. D. (2020). Playful work design: Introduction of a new concept. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 23, e19. https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2020.20
6.
BeghettoR. A.KarwowskiM. (2017). Chapter 1—Toward Untangling Creative Self-Beliefs. In KarwowskiM.KaufmanJ. C. (Eds.), The Creative Self (pp. 3–22). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809790-8.00001-7
7.
BenedekM.BruckdorferR.JaukE. (2020). Motives for creativity: Exploring the what and why of everyday creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 610–625. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.396
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
12.
BrislinR. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). Sage Publications, Inc.
13.
BrownS. L. (2009). Play: How it shapes the brain, opens the imagination, and invigorates the soul. Penguin.
14.
CailloisR. (1980). Man and the Sacred (Transl. M. Barash). Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
15.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1996). Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention (Vol. 56). New York: Harper Collins.
16.
FarmerS. M.TierneyP. (2017). Considering Creative Self-Efficacy: Its Current State and Ideas for Future Inquiry. In The Creative Self (pp. 23–47). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809790-8.00002-9
17.
FeistG. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
18.
FordC. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.2307/259166
19.
GoslingS. D.VazireS.SrivastavaS.JohnO. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59(2), 93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.93
20.
Gonzalo-IglesiaJ. L.Lozano-MonterrubioN.Prades-TenaJ. (2018). The usage of game-based learning in university education. How to motivate and foster creativity among adult students through board games. Proceedings of Play2Learn, 67–84.
21.
HaaseJ.HanelP. H.GronauN. (2023). Creativity enhancement methods for adults: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000557
22.
HammondM. M.NeffN. L.FarrJ. L.SchwallA. R.ZhaoX. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018556
23.
HuizingaJ. (1955). Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-element in Culture. Beacon Press.
IsmailM. K.CiesielskiV. (2003). An empirical investigation of the impact of discretization on common data distributions. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems (pp. 692–701). Melbourne, Australia: IOS Press.
KankainenV. (2024). Curating the Self-Identity: Tabletop Game Hobbyist Online Practices as an Extended Leisure Experience. Leisure Sciences, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2024.2305666
28.
KarwowskiM. (2012). Did curiosity kill the cat? Relationship between trait curiosity, creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 8(4), 547–558. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v8i4.513
29.
KarwowskiM.BeghettoR. A. (2019). Creative behavior as agentic action. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(4), 402. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000190
30.
KarwowskiM.LebudaI.WiśniewskaE. (2018). Measuring creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving.
31.
KaufmanJ. C. (2012). Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman domains of creativity scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029751
32.
KaufmanJ. C.BeghettoR. A. (2009). Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688
33.
KaufmanJ. C.GlăveanuV. P.BaerJ. (2017). The Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316274385
34.
KerlingerF.LeeH. (2000). Foundations of Behavioural Research. Florida: Harcourt College Publishers.
35.
KuoH.-C.WengT.-L.ChangC.-C.ChangC.-Y. (2023). Designing Our Own Board Games in the Playful Space: Improving High School Student’s Citizenship Competencies and Creativity through Game-Based Learning. Sustainability, 15(4), 2968. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042968
LubartT.MouchiroudC.TordjmanS.ZenasniF. (2015). Psychologie de la créativité-2e édition. Armand Colin.
38.
McCraeR. R.SutinA. R. (2009). Openness to Experience. InLearyM. R.HoyleR. H. (Eds.), Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior (pp. 257-273). New York: Guilford.
39.
MercierM.LubartT. (2021). The effects of board games on creative potential. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(3), 875–885. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.494
40.
MercierM.LubartT. (2023a). Board games enhance creativity: Evidence from two studies. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000547
41.
MercierM.LubartT. (2023b). Video games and creativity: The mediating role of psychological capital. Journal of Creativity, 33(2), 100050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100050
42.
MoffatD. C.CrombieW.ShabalinaO. (2017). Some video games can increase the player’s creativity. International Journal of Game-Based Learning (IJGBL), 7(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2017040103
43.
NgT. W.FeldmanD. C. (2012). A comparison of self-ratings and non-self-report measures of employee creativity. Human Relations, 65(8), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712446015
OrkibiH. (2021). Creative adaptability: Conceptual framework, measurement, and outcomes in times of crisis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 588172. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588172
46.
ParkJ.LeeK. (2017). Using board games to improve mathematical creativity. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 12(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKL.2017.088182
47.
ProyerR. T. (2012). Examining playfulness in adults: Testing its correlates with personality, positive psychological functioning, goal aspirations, and multi-methodically assessed ingenuity. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 54(2), 103–127.
48.
ProyerR. T. (2017). A new structural model for the study of adult playfulness: Assessment and exploration of an understudied individual differences variable. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.12.011
RuncoM. A.IlliesJ. J.EisenmanR. (2005). Creativity, originality, and appropriateness: What do explicit instructions tell us about their relationships?The Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01255.x
RussS. W.RobinsA. L.ChristianoB. A. (1999). Pretend play: Longitudinal prediction of creativity and affect in fantasy in children. Creativity Research Journal, 12(2), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1202_5
ScharpY. S.BakkerA. B.BreevaartK.KruupK.UusbergA. (2023). Playful work design: Conceptualization, measurement, and validity. Human Relations, 76(4), 509–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267211070996
56.
ShenX.LiuH.SongR. (2021). Toward a culture-sensitive approach to playfulness research: Development of the Adult Playfulness Trait Scale-Chinese version and an alternative measurement model. Journal of Leisure Research, 52(4), 401–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2020.1850193
57.
ShenX.MasekL. (2023). The playful mediator, moderator, or outcome? An integrative review of the roles of play and playfulness in adult-centered psychological interventions for mental health. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2023.2288955
58.
ShenX. S.ChickG.ZinnH. (2014a). Playfulness in Adulthood as a Personality Trait: A Reconceptualization and a New Measurement. Journal of Leisure Research, 46(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2014.11950313
59.
ShenX. S.ChickG.ZinnH. (2014b). Validating the Adult Playfulness Trait Scale (APTS): An Examination of Personality, Behavior, Attitude, and Perception in the Nomological Network of Playfulness. American Journal of Play, 6(3), 345–369. https://doi.org/10.1037/t61751-000
60.
SingerD. L.RummoJ. (1973). Ideational creativity and behavioral style in kindergarten-age children. Developmental Psychology, 8(2), 154. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034155
WallaceC. E.RussS. W. (2015). Pretend play, divergent thinking, and math achievement in girls: A longitudinal study. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(3), 296. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039006
63.
WestS. E.HoffE.CarlssonI. (2016). Play and Productivity: Enhancing the Creative Climate at Workplace Meetings with Play Cues. American Journal of Play, 9(1), 71–86.
64.
WyverS. R.SpenceS. H. (1999). Play and divergent problem solving: Evidence supporting a reciprocal relationship. Early Education and Development, 10(4), 419–444. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1004_1
65.
Yonatan-LeusR.SheflerG.TishbyO. (2020). Do positive features of mental health change together with symptoms and do they predict each other?Psychotherapy, 57(3), 391. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000280
66.
ZhouJ.GeorgeJ. M. (2003). Awakening employee creativity: The role of leader emotional intelligence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4–5), 545–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00051-1
67.
ZhouJ.HoeverI. J. (2014). Research on Workplace Creativity: A Review and Redirection. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 333–359. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091226
