Collective Action for Sustainable Farmer Water Management: The Case of the KILIMO NA MAJI Serious Game

Abstract

Background

Farmers in water scarce landscapes adapt in response to the erratic weather conditions. Adaptation through irrigation, depend on water access, while impacting on downstream water availability. Competition for scarce water commons among multiple users defines a collective action problem. Farmer land-, and water-use decisions are based on both economic rationality of cost-benefit expectations, and relational rationality of reconciling conflicting opinions of important person(s) in a farmer’s social world, such as other water users, government, or spirits. Serious games that represent this duality of choices can help both players and interested others to analyze how social relations influence farmer decision-making.

Intervention

Here we describe the generic design and early experiences with specific use of the KILIMO NA MAJI game. The game is designed to analyse effect of social relations as farmers individually and/or collectively explore alternative options for crop production in scarce water commons.

Methods

We designed and applied the game in the Mt. Kenya region; a semi-arid region, ranging across a gradient of upstream water abundance to downstream water scarcity. The design of the game was informed by literature, and information from local stakeholders. We analyzed data from the pilot game sessions to assess quality and effectiveness of the game using Likert scale and a ‘solution space’ which defines a bandwidth around the mean where tradeoffs between farm-income and water-use can be partially managed.

Results

Playing the game with local stakeholders showed that social relations that participants had with traders, agro-export companies and other important persons determined where their game outcomes were positioned within the solution space.

Conclusion

Playing KILIMO NA MAJI can help assess influence of social relations and support collective exploration of alternatives to crops production in water scarce landscapes.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Collective action farmer decisions Mt. Kenya serious games scarce water commons social relations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bars

M. LE

Grusse

P. LE

Albouchi

(2014). AquaFej: A simulation game for planning water management - An experiment in central Tunisia. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 17(3), 242–260. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2014.064180

Biggs

de Vos

Preiser

Clements

Maciejewski

Schlüter

(2021). The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods for Social-Ecological Systems. Taylor & Francis.

Edwards

Sharma-Wallace

Wreford

Holt

Cradock-Henry

N. A.

Flood

Velarde

S. J.

(2019). Tools for adaptive governance for complex social-ecological systems: A review of role-playing-games as serious games at the community-policy interface. Environmental Research Letters, 14(11). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab4036

Edwards-Jones

(2006). Modelling farmer decision-making: concepts, progress, and challenges. Animal Science, 82(6), 783–790.

Etienne

(2014). Companion Modelling: A participatory approach to support sustainable development. In Companion Modelling: A Participatory Approach to Support Sustainable Development (Vol. 9789401785570). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8557-0

Etienne

Du Toit

D. R.

Pollard

(2011). ARDI: A Co-construction Method for Participatory Modeling in Natural Resources. 16(1). https://about.jstor.org/terms

Falk

Zhang

Meinzen-Dick

Bartels

Sanil

Priyadarshini

Soliev

(2023). Games for experiential learning: triggering collective changes in commons management. Ecology and Society, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13862-280130

Fanadzo

Ncube

(2018). Challenges and opportunities for revitalising smallholder irrigation schemes in South Africa. In Water SA (Vol. 44, Issue 3, pp. 436–447). South African Water Research Commission . https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v44i3.11

Ferrand

Farolfi

Abrami

Du Toit

(2009, June). WAT-A-GAME: sharing water and policies in your own basin. In 40th Annual Conference, Int. Simulation and Gaming Association (pp. 17-p). https://hal.science/hal-01355501

10.

Fjællingsdal

K. S.

Klöckner

C. A.

(2020). Green Across the Board: Board Games as Tools for Dialogue and Simplified Environmental Communication. Simulation and Gaming, 51(5), 632–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878120925133

11.

García-Barrios

L. E.

Speelman

E. N.

Pimm

M. S.

(2008). An educational simulation tool for negotiating sustainable natural resource management strategies among stakeholders with conflicting interests. Ecological Modelling, 210(1–2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.07.009

12.

Githinji

van Noordwijk

Muthuri

Speelman

Hofstede

G. J.

(2023). Farmer land-use decision-making from an instrumental and relational perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability.

13.

Githinji

van Noordwijk

Muthuri

Speelman

E. N.

Kampen

Hofstede

G. J.

(2024). “You never farm alone”: farmer land-use decisions influenced by social relations. Journal of rural studies.

14.

Hertzog

Poussin

J. C.

Tangara

Kouriba

Jamin

J. Y.

(2014). A role-playing game to address future water management issues in a large irrigated system: Experience from Mali. Agricultural Water Management, 137, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.02.003

15.

Hofstede

G. J.

de Caluwé

Peters

(2010). Why simulation games work-in search of the active substance: A synthesis. Simulation and Gaming, 41(6), 824–843. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878110375596

16.

Hofstede

G. J.

Jonker

C. M.

Verwaart

Yorke-Smith

(2019). The lemon car game across cultures: Evidence of relational rationality. Group Decision and Negotiation, 28(5), 849–877.

17.

Hofstede

G. J.

Liu

(2020). To Stay or Not to Stay? Artificial Sociality in GRASP World. Springer Proceedings in Complexity, 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34127-5_20

18.

Janssen

M. A.

Falk

Meinzen-Dick

Vollan

(2023). Using games for social learning to promote self-governance. In Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (Vol. 62). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101289

19.

Kanda

E. K.

Lutta

V. O.

(2022). The status and challenges of a modern irrigation system in Kenya: A systematic review. Irrigation and Drainage, 71(S1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2700

20.

Kemper

T. D.

(1968). Reference groups, socialization, and achievement. American Sociological Review, 31–45.

21.

Kemper

T. D.

(2006). Power and status and the power-status theory of emotions. In Handbook of the sociology of emotions (pp. 87–113). Springer.

22.

Kemper

T. D.

(2011). Status, power, and ritual interaction: a relational reading of Durkheim, Goffman, and Collins. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.

23.

Kemper

T. D.

(2017). Elementary Forms of Social Relations: Status, power, and reference groups. Routledge.

24.

Kimwatu

D. M.

Mundia

C. N.

Makokha

G. O.

(2021). Developing a new socio-economic drought index for monitoring drought proliferation: a case study of Upper Ewaso Ngiro River Basin in Kenya. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-08989-0

25.

Kiteme

(2020). Hotspots of Water Scarcity and Conflicts in the Ewaso Ng’iro North Basin.

26.

Kom

Nethengwe

N. S.

Mpandeli

N. S.

Chikoore

(2022). Determinants of small-scale farmers’ choice and adaptive strategies in response to climatic shocks in Vhembe District, South Africa. GeoJournal, 87(2), 677–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10272-7

27.

Kriz

W. C.

(2017). Historical Roots and New Fruits of Gaming and Simulation. In Simulation and Gaming (Vol. 48, Issue 5, pp. 583–587). SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878117732845

28.

Lairez

Lopez-Ridaura

Jourdain

Falconnier

G. N.

Lienhard

Striffler

Syfongxay

Affholder

(2020). Context matters: Agronomic field monitoring and participatory research to identify criteria of farming system sustainability in South-East Asia. Agricultural Systems, 182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102830

29.

Lankford

B. A.

Sokile

C. S.

Yawson

D. K.

Levite

(2003). The River Basin Game: A water Dialogue Tool (75). International Water Management Institute.

30.

Le Bars

Le Grusse

Allaya

Attonaty

J. M.

Mahjoubi

Le Grusse

(2004). NECC: un jeu de simulation pour l’aide à la décision collective. Application à une région méditerranéenne ‘virtuelle.’ https://hal.science/cirad-00189712

31.

Lesrima

Nyamasyo

Kiemo

(2021). Unresolved Water Conflicts by Water Sector Institutions in Ewaso Ng’iro North River Sub-Basin, Kenya. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 25(2), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v25i2.21

32.

Loudin

(2019). Can we use a social experiment to assess the impact of participatory processes for water management? Studying a generic method tackling the evaluation of capabilities. AgroParisTech.

33.

McConville

J. R.

Billger

Niwagaba

C. B.

Kain

J. H.

(2023). Assessing the potential to use serious gaming in planning processes for sanitation designed for resource recovery. Environmental Science and Policy, 145, 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.04.002

34.

Ng’ang’a

T. W.

Coulibaly

J. Y.

Gachene

C. K. K.

Kironchi

(2021). An oasis in the dryland of Kenya! The case of irrigation as an adaptation strategy among the transitioning pastoralists and agro-pastoralists of Laikipia County, Kenya. Journal of Cleaner Production, 303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126764

35.

Njinju

S. M.

Gweyi

J. O.

Mayoli

R. N.

(2022). Drought-Resilient Climate Smart Sorghum Varieties for Food and Industrial Use in Marginal Frontier Areas of Kenya. In Agriculture, Livestock Production and Aquaculture (pp. 33–44). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93262-6_3

36.

Nordman

(2021). The uncommon knowledge of Elinor Ostrom: Essential lessons for collective action. Island Press.

37.

Ostrom

(1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge university press.

38.

Peter

Imatari

(2019). 50 FOOD INSECURITY IN ARID AND SEMI-ARID LANDS (ASAL) IN AFRICA (PAID). Journal of African Studies and Sustainable Development, 2(8), 2630–7073. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27700.81281

39.

Pilarova

Kandakov

Bavorova

(2022). Adaptation of smallholder farmers to climate risks: Remittances and irrigation investment in the Republic of Moldova. Water Resources and Economics, 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wre.2022.100200

40.

Rakotonarivo

O. S.

Bell

Dillon

Duthie

A. B.

Kipchumba

Rasolofoson

R. A.

Razafimanahaka

Bunnefeld

(2021). Experimental Evidence on the Impact of Payments and Property Rights on Forest User Decisions. Frontiers in Conservation Science, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2021.661987

41.

Ratemo

C. M.

Ogendi

G. M.

Huang

Ondieki

R. N.

(2020). Application of Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Food and Water Security in the Semi-Arid Turkana County, Kenya. Open Journal of Ecology, 10(06), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2020.106020

42.

Rooney-Varga

J. N.

Kapmeier

Sterman

J. D.

Jones

A. P.

Putko

Rath

(2020). The Climate Action Simulation. Simulation and Gaming, 51(2), 114–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878119890643

43.

Sari

Tanika

Speelman

Saputra

Hakim

Rozendaal

Hairiah

Noordwijk

(2023). Farmer Options and Risks in Complex Ecological-Social systems: the FORCES game designed for agroforestry management of upper watersheds. Agricultural Systems.

44.

Sindhu

Kumar

Yadav

Chaudhary

Jaiwal

P. K.

(2019). Current advances and future directions in genetic enhancement of a climate resilient food legume crop, cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.). In Plant Cell, Tissue, and Organ Culture (Vol. 139, Issue 3, pp. 429–453). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-019-01695-3

45.

Smith

(1992). CROPWAT: A computer program for irrigation planning and management (Issue 46). Food & Agriculture Org.

46.

Sollen-Norrlin

Ghaley

B. B.

Rintoul

N. L. J.

(2020). Agroforestry benefits and challenges for adoption in Europe and beyond. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 12, Issue 17). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177001

47.

Speelman

E. N.

Escano

Marcos

Becu

(2023). Serious games and citizen science; from parallel pathways to greater synergies. In Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (Vol. 64). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101320

48.

Speelman

E. N.

Van Noordwijk

Garcia

(2018). Gaming to better manage complex natural resource landscapes.

49.

Sterman

Franck

Fiddaman

Jones

McCauley

Rice

Sawin

Siegel

Rooney-Varga

J. N.

(2015). WORLD CLIMATE: A Role-Play Simulation of Climate Negotiations. Simulation and Gaming, 46(3–4), 348–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878113514935

50.

Timothy

Lokina

James Mgale

Dimoso

(2022). What matters in adoption of small-scale rainwater harvesting technologies at household level? Evidence from Charco-dam users in Nzega, Tanzania. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2022.2112429

51.

Toshiko

Kriz

Sugiura

(2022). Gaming as a cultural common (Vol. 28). https://link.springer.com/bookseries/11213

52.

van Noordwijk

(2019). Sustainable development through trees on farms: Agroforestry in its fifth decade. World Agroforestry (ICRAF).

53.

van Noordwijk

Leimona

Amaruzaman

Pascual

Minang

P. A.

Prabhu

(2023a). Five levels of internalizing environmental externalities: decision-making based on instrumental and relational values of nature. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 63, 101299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101299

54.

van Noordwijk

Speelman

Hofstede

G. J.

Farida

Abdurrahim

A. Y.

Miccolis

Hakim

A. L.

Wamucii

C. N.

Lagneaux

Andreotti

Kimbowa

Assogba

G. G. C.

Best

Tanika

Githinji

Rosero

Sari

R. R.

Satnarain

Adiwibowo

Teuling

A. J.

(2020). Sustainable agroforestry landscape management: Changing the game. Land, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND9080243

55.

van Noordwijk

Villamor

G. B.

Hofstede

G. J.

Speelman

(2023b). Relational versus instrumental perspectives on values of nature and resource management decisions ☆. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101374

56.

Villamayor-Tomas

García-López

(2017). The influence of community-based resource management institutions on adaptation capacity: A large-n study of farmer responses to climate and global market disturbances. Global Environmental Change, 47, 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.10.002

57.

Villamor

G. B.

Badmos

B. K.

(2016). Grazing game: A learning tool for adaptive management in response to climate variability in semiarid areas of Ghana. Ecology and Society, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08139-210139

58.

Villamor

G. B.

van Noordwijk

(2011). Social role-play games Vs individual perceptions of conservation PES agreements for maintaining rubber agroforests in Jambi (Sumatra), Indonesia. Ecology and Society, 16(3), 27. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04339-160327

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.29 MB